DarkStar
R1bcel
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2022
- Posts
- 37,988
Link to scientific journal-article:
In fact, it seems they even state this within the article itself:
This correlates heavily with the lives of most men, whom have to put in excessive amounts of effort on a daily-grind in order to attain what they desire: In contrast, foids lives are the effective opposite, in which competitions may seem more "drawn-out" with a clear defined "win-loss outcome"
This correlates heavily with what we see in the outside world: We see men are becoming somewhat "feminized" through diets, products, LGBTQ+ in the media, and other things done to keep us effectively as "betas" whom only exist to serve as the backbone of society, all with little to no reward. For foids, however, this can explain why they behave the way they do now even more: Whilst a lot of foid behavior is due to their innate biological conditions, it also correlates heavily with the fact that foids are very easy to manipulate & control. As such, they are susceptible to any kind of agenda which is being pushed, and are some of the least-likely to realize it.
In fact, more foids are in positions of power now than ever:
Thus, we can amount to concede that the growth of foids in positions of power will only cause more issues; what else is new?
Possibly interested users:
Before they even delve into the findings, they discern this information towards us. Frankly, I do believe that the majority of genes, hormones, etc. & the way they function in relation to testosterone is clearly genetically pre-determined, in a similar way that IQ is: However, they also touch upon the Socio-Cultural factors which may impact this, which I of course would find interesting. Another topic I plan on discussing, is how diets & many other things relate to altering out hormones, biology, etc. may have contributed towards the rise in Inceldom in some ways.Human biology is typically studied within the framework of sex (evolved, innate factors) rather than gender (sociocultural factors), despite some attention to nature/nurture interactions. Testosterone is an exemplar of biology studied as natural difference: men’s higher testosterone is typically seen as an innate “sex” difference. However, our experiment demonstrates that gender-related social factors also matter, even for biological measures. Gender socialization may affect testosterone by encouraging men but not women toward behaviors that increase testosterone. This shows that research on human sex biology needs to account for gender socialization and that nurture, as well as nature, is salient to hormone physiology. Our paper provides a demonstration of a novel gender→testosterone pathway, opening up new avenues for studying gender biology
Essentially, what this discerns to us is that whilst testosterone may have a strong foundation within the sense of a pure biological construct, it can also possibly be influenced by that of our environment: Clearly, our biological nature is malleable, which we see emphasized heavily in our modERn world.We hypothesized in H1 (stereotyped behavior) that wielding power increases testosterone regardless of how it is performed, vs. H2 (stereotyped performance), that wielding power performed in masculine but not feminine ways increases testosterone. We found that wielding power increased testosterone in women compared with a control, regardless of whether it was performed in gender-stereotyped masculine or feminine ways. Results supported H1 over H2: stereotyped behavior but not performance modulated testosterone.
This statement here is quite interesting: Effectively, they reinforce the (mostly)factually correct belief that testosterone is what makes us males, which obviously correlates heavily with the attacks on it through various means. In a way, I see this as them sort of "saying the quiet part out loud" again.Together, this leads to characterizations of testosterone as the essence of maleness, fixed and unchanging, and determined by only innate factors
This should seem obvious to anyone, since a driving factor amongst males is competition: However, it would be interesting to look at this from the perspective of foids. Whilst they do innately have it easier, they are of course in a competition with another to climb to social & genetic latter & attain the closest equivalent they can of chad. Another perspective on this, would be through our angle: Whilst it is true the modern world has effectively increased competition, it does so in a way which likely is counterintuitive. As males, our testosterone levels are already quite low due to varying factors, so is this perhaps another reason? Let's hypothesize, and consider what we know about modern hypergamy & the issues it brings: Men constantly have to engage in this "competition" type of behavior, which may as a result cause a decrease in it, especially when most men do not receive any kind of "reward" on confirmation of sorts for engaging in this.Theory predicts that, for testosterone, one evolutionarily salient social context is competition (3). Competition, and its behavioral examples such as wielding power, are relevant to gender, testosterone, and evolution, making them especially relevant for testing possible gender→testosterone pathways.
In fact, it seems they even state this within the article itself:
men could actually show dampened testosterone responses to individual competitive events because of their higher rate of engagement in them. This may be especially the case for competitions enacted in social daily life because these are the ones with high frequencies of engagement (in contrast to infrequent formalized competitions with clear win/loss outcomes, where men’s testosterone can show an increase
This correlates heavily with the lives of most men, whom have to put in excessive amounts of effort on a daily-grind in order to attain what they desire: In contrast, foids lives are the effective opposite, in which competitions may seem more "drawn-out" with a clear defined "win-loss outcome"
This discerns to us what we need to know: Whenever foids are in some kind of "position of power" be it in the stereotypically masculine way, or just through holding power.Results with both women and men showed that wielding power significantly increased testosterone regardless of how it was done, supporting H1, the stereotyped behavior pathway [multivariate F(2, 38) = 5.70, P = 0.007, ηηp2 = 0.231]. However, this effect differed significantly for women and men [multivariate F(2, 38) = 3.38, P = 0.044, ηηp2 = 0.151], with only women showing a significant effect of condition on testosterone [multivariate F(2, 13) = 4.00, P = 0.044, ηηp2 = 0.381]. In women, the masculine condition significantly (P = 0.024, Cohen’s dz = 0.65) and the feminine condition marginally (P = 0.066, Cohen’s dz = 0.51) increased testosterone relative to the control condition. Wielding power in a feminine and especially in a masculine way thus increased testosterone in women,
This correlates heavily with what we see in the outside world: We see men are becoming somewhat "feminized" through diets, products, LGBTQ+ in the media, and other things done to keep us effectively as "betas" whom only exist to serve as the backbone of society, all with little to no reward. For foids, however, this can explain why they behave the way they do now even more: Whilst a lot of foid behavior is due to their innate biological conditions, it also correlates heavily with the fact that foids are very easy to manipulate & control. As such, they are susceptible to any kind of agenda which is being pushed, and are some of the least-likely to realize it.
In fact, more foids are in positions of power now than ever:
- From 2019 to 2023, women-owned businesses’ growth rate outpaced the rate of men’s 94.3% for number of firms, 252.8% for employment, and 82.0% for revenue.
New Report Finds Growth of Women Business Owners Outpaces the Market
The number of women-owned businesses increased at nearly double the rate of their male counterparts Black women and Latina entrepreneurs emerged from the pandemic stronger than all women-owned employers Women-owned businesses continue to fuel the economy, representing 39.1% of all businesses –...
newsroom.wf.com
Women make up 29.9% of state senate seats and 33.7% of state house or assembly seats. Three women serve as state senate president, and another 13 as senate presidents pro tempore. An additional eight are speakers of state houses.
In 2019, Nevada became the first state with a majority-women state legislature. Women currently hold a 62% majority of the Nevada state legislature – the largest percentage of any state. West Virginia has the smallest share, at 11.9%.
The Data on Women Leaders
Key trends and data on women in top U.S. political, business and higher education positions.
www.pewresearch.org
In New Mexico, 46.1% of top executive positions are held by females, the highest share of any state in the country.
Women held 31.7% of top executive positions across industries in 2021, a near five-point increase since 2015, when it stood at 27.1%
Explore Census Data
data.census.gov
Thus, we can amount to concede that the growth of foids in positions of power will only cause more issues; what else is new?
Possibly interested users:
@Chudpreet @based_meme @cvh1991 @Biowaste Removal @wereq @LeFrenchCel @NoIdeaWhatToDo @Pancakecel @Copexodius Maximus @WorthlessSlavicShit @Corvus @KillNiggers @Ron.Belgrade @My Name Jeff @Mortis @To koniec @TBIcel @Uggo Mongo