Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Toxic Femininity [Blackpill]Putting Foids In Positions of Power Increases Their Testosterone.

DarkStarDownBad

DarkStarDownBad

nevER lose your smile
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 20, 2022
Posts
23,552
Link to scientific journal-article:


Human biology is typically studied within the framework of sex (evolved, innate factors) rather than gender (sociocultural factors), despite some attention to nature/nurture interactions. Testosterone is an exemplar of biology studied as natural difference: men’s higher testosterone is typically seen as an innate “sex” difference. However, our experiment demonstrates that gender-related social factors also matter, even for biological measures. Gender socialization may affect testosterone by encouraging men but not women toward behaviors that increase testosterone. This shows that research on human sex biology needs to account for gender socialization and that nurture, as well as nature, is salient to hormone physiology. Our paper provides a demonstration of a novel gender→testosterone pathway, opening up new avenues for studying gender biology
Before they even delve into the findings, they discern this information towards us. Frankly, I do believe that the majority of genes, hormones, etc. & the way they function in relation to testosterone is clearly genetically pre-determined, in a similar way that IQ is: However, they also touch upon the Socio-Cultural factors which may impact this, which I of course would find interesting. Another topic I plan on discussing, is how diets & many other things relate to altering out hormones, biology, etc. may have contributed towards the rise in Inceldom in some ways.

We hypothesized in H1 (stereotyped behavior) that wielding power increases testosterone regardless of how it is performed, vs. H2 (stereotyped performance), that wielding power performed in masculine but not feminine ways increases testosterone. We found that wielding power increased testosterone in women compared with a control, regardless of whether it was performed in gender-stereotyped masculine or feminine ways. Results supported H1 over H2: stereotyped behavior but not performance modulated testosterone.
Essentially, what this discerns to us is that whilst testosterone may have a strong foundation within the sense of a pure biological construct, it can also possibly be influenced by that of our environment: Clearly, our biological nature is malleable, which we see emphasized heavily in our modERn world.

Together, this leads to characterizations of testosterone as the essence of maleness, fixed and unchanging, and determined by only innate factors
This statement here is quite interesting: Effectively, they reinforce the (mostly)factually correct belief that testosterone is what makes us males, which obviously correlates heavily with the attacks on it through various means. In a way, I see this as them sort of "saying the quiet part out loud" again.

Theory predicts that, for testosterone, one evolutionarily salient social context is competition (3). Competition, and its behavioral examples such as wielding power, are relevant to gender, testosterone, and evolution, making them especially relevant for testing possible gender→testosterone pathways.
This should seem obvious to anyone, since a driving factor amongst males is competition: However, it would be interesting to look at this from the perspective of foids. Whilst they do innately have it easier, they are of course in a competition with another to climb to social & genetic latter & attain the closest equivalent they can of chad. Another perspective on this, would be through our angle: Whilst it is true the modern world has effectively increased competition, it does so in a way which likely is counterintuitive. As males, our testosterone levels are already quite low due to varying factors, so is this perhaps another reason? Let's hypothesize, and consider what we know about modern hypergamy & the issues it brings: Men constantly have to engage in this "competition" type of behavior, which may as a result cause a decrease in it, especially when most men do not receive any kind of "reward" on confirmation of sorts for engaging in this.

In fact, it seems they even state this within the article itself:
men could actually show dampened testosterone responses to individual competitive events because of their higher rate of engagement in them. This may be especially the case for competitions enacted in social daily life because these are the ones with high frequencies of engagement (in contrast to infrequent formalized competitions with clear win/loss outcomes, where men’s testosterone can show an increase

This correlates heavily with the lives of most men, whom have to put in excessive amounts of effort on a daily-grind in order to attain what they desire: In contrast, foids lives are the effective opposite, in which competitions may seem more "drawn-out" with a clear defined "win-loss outcome"


Results with both women and men showed that wielding power significantly increased testosterone regardless of how it was done, supporting H1, the stereotyped behavior pathway [multivariate F(2, 38) = 5.70, P = 0.007, ηηp2 = 0.231]. However, this effect differed significantly for women and men [multivariate F(2, 38) = 3.38, P = 0.044, ηηp2 = 0.151], with only women showing a significant effect of condition on testosterone [multivariate F(2, 13) = 4.00, P = 0.044, ηηp2 = 0.381]. In women, the masculine condition significantly (P = 0.024, Cohen’s dz = 0.65) and the feminine condition marginally (P = 0.066, Cohen’s dz = 0.51) increased testosterone relative to the control condition. Wielding power in a feminine and especially in a masculine way thus increased testosterone in women,
This discerns to us what we need to know: Whenever foids are in some kind of "position of power" be it in the stereotypically masculine way, or just through holding power.

This correlates heavily with what we see in the outside world: We see men are becoming somewhat "feminized" through diets, products, LGBTQ+ in the media, and other things done to keep us effectively as "betas" whom only exist to serve as the backbone of society, all with little to no reward. For foids, however, this can explain why they behave the way they do now even more: Whilst a lot of foid behavior is due to their innate biological conditions, it also correlates heavily with the fact that foids are very easy to manipulate & control. As such, they are susceptible to any kind of agenda which is being pushed, and are some of the least-likely to realize it.

In fact, more foids are in positions of power now than ever:


  • From 2019 to 2023, women-owned businesses’ growth rate outpaced the rate of men’s 94.3% for number of firms, 252.8% for employment, and 82.0% for revenue.


Women make up 29.9% of state senate seats and 33.7% of state house or assembly seats. Three women serve as state senate president, and another 13 as senate presidents pro tempore. An additional eight are speakers of state houses.

In 2019, Nevada became the first state with a majority-women state legislature. Women currently hold a 62% majority of the Nevada state legislature – the largest percentage of any state. West Virginia has the smallest share, at 11.9%.


In New Mexico, 46.1% of top executive positions are held by females, the highest share of any state in the country.

Women held 31.7% of top executive positions across industries in 2021, a near five-point increase since 2015, when it stood at 27.1%

Thus, we can amount to concede that the growth of foids in positions of power will only cause more issues; what else is new? :feelsjuice:

Possibly interested users:


@Chudpreet @based_meme @cvh1991 @Biowaste Removal @wereq @LeFrenchCel @NoIdeaWhatToDo @Pancakecel @Copexodius Maximus @WorthlessSlavicShit @Corvus @KillNiggers @Ron.Belgrade @My Name Jeff @Mortis @To koniec @TBIcel @Uggo Mongo
 
Like many said before...foids are getting more masculine while men are getting feminized

this result in only one solution - TROONS

jooking aside what do you think future indictations do you has for humanity or at least western countries genepool by this ?
 
Like many said before...foids are getting more masculine while men are getting feminized
This article just proves it more, especially with the rise of foids in "positions of power" in politics, business, etc.
this result in only one solution - TROONS

jooking aside what do you think future indictations do you has for humanity or at least western countries genepool by this ?
Simple, more dysgenics.
 
they will never have enough testosterone to be competent
 
Like many said before...foids are getting more masculine while men are getting feminized

this result in only one solution - TROONS

jooking aside what do you think future indictations do you has for humanity or at least western countries genepool by this ?
Troons are the cure to feminism tbh.

Link to scientific journal-article:



Before they even delve into the findings, they discern this information towards us. Frankly, I do believe that the majority of genes, hormones, etc. & the way they function in relation to testosterone is clearly genetically pre-determined, in a similar way that IQ is: However, they also touch upon the Socio-Cultural factors which may impact this, which I of course would find interesting. Another topic I plan on discussing, is how diets & many other things relate to altering out hormones, biology, etc. may have contributed towards the rise in Inceldom in some ways.


Essentially, what this discerns to us is that whilst testosterone may have a strong foundation within the sense of a pure biological construct, it can also possibly be influenced by that of our environment: Clearly, our biological nature is malleable, which we see emphasized heavily in our modERn world.


This statement here is quite interesting: Effectively, they reinforce the (mostly)factually correct belief that testosterone is what makes us males, which obviously correlates heavily with the attacks on it through various means. In a way, I see this as them sort of "saying the quiet part out loud" again.


This should seem obvious to anyone, since a driving factor amongst males is competition: However, it would be interesting to look at this from the perspective of foids. Whilst they do innately have it easier, they are of course in a competition with another to climb to social & genetic latter & attain the closest equivalent they can of chad. Another perspective on this, would be through our angle: Whilst it is true the modern world has effectively increased competition, it does so in a way which likely is counterintuitive. As males, our testosterone levels are already quite low due to varying factors, so is this perhaps another reason? Let's hypothesize, and consider what we know about modern hypergamy & the issues it brings: Men constantly have to engage in this "competition" type of behavior, which may as a result cause a decrease in it, especially when most men do not receive any kind of "reward" on confirmation of sorts for engaging in this.

In fact, it seems they even state this within the article itself:


This correlates heavily with the lives of most men, whom have to put in excessive amounts of effort on a daily-grind in order to attain what they desire: In contrast, foids lives are the effective opposite, in which competitions may seem more "drawn-out" with a clear defined "win-loss outcome"



This discerns to us what we need to know: Whenever foids are in some kind of "position of power" be it in the stereotypically masculine way, or just through holding power.

This correlates heavily with what we see in the outside world: We see men are becoming somewhat "feminized" through diets, products, LGBTQ+ in the media, and other things done to keep us effectively as "betas" whom only exist to serve as the backbone of society, all with little to no reward. For foids, however, this can explain why they behave the way they do now even more: Whilst a lot of foid behavior is due to their innate biological conditions, it also correlates heavily with the fact that foids are very easy to manipulate & control. As such, they are susceptible to any kind of agenda which is being pushed, and are some of the least-likely to realize it.

In fact, more foids are in positions of power now than ever:














Thus, we can amount to concede that the growth of foids in positions of power will only cause more issues; what else is new? :feelsjuice:

Possibly interested users:


@Chudpreet @based_meme @cvh1991 @Biowaste Removal @wereq @LeFrenchCel @NoIdeaWhatToDo @Pancakecel @Copexodius Maximus @WorthlessSlavicShit @Corvus @KillNiggers @Ron.Belgrade @My Name Jeff @Mortis @To koniec @TBIcel @Uggo Mongo
So the women might literally becoming manly even without troonmaxxing. There was another study that showed competition and going through a hard life is usually psychologically harmful for women overall, but the opposite is true for males.

I’m guessing the study didn’t include things like lifelong problems, such as ugliness which can’t be overcome in any way.
 
Troons are the cure to feminism tbh.
Elab.
So the women might literally becoming manly even without troonmaxxing.
Yup- I also think(struggling to find sources) that modern diets are doing the opposite to foids: It's increasing their testosterone.
There was another study that showed competition and going through a hard life is usually psychologically harmful for women overall, but the opposite is true for males.
Link to it?
I’m guessing the study didn’t include things like lifelong problems, such as ugliness which can’t be overcome in any way.
Lookism doesn't apply to foids anyways, but still it likely didn't: However, the findings prove relevant & interesting imo.
 
i wonder if the opposite is true, that being made subservient and ruled over lowers testosterone?

if we lived in a sane world this would be extremely alarming. instead we live in a clown world so it's seen as empowering jfl
 
Link to scientific journal-article:



Before they even delve into the findings, they discern this information towards us. Frankly, I do believe that the majority of genes, hormones, etc. & the way they function in relation to testosterone is clearly genetically pre-determined, in a similar way that IQ is: However, they also touch upon the Socio-Cultural factors which may impact this, which I of course would find interesting. Another topic I plan on discussing, is how diets & many other things relate to altering out hormones, biology, etc. may have contributed towards the rise in Inceldom in some ways.


Essentially, what this discerns to us is that whilst testosterone may have a strong foundation within the sense of a pure biological construct, it can also possibly be influenced by that of our environment: Clearly, our biological nature is malleable, which we see emphasized heavily in our modERn world.


This statement here is quite interesting: Effectively, they reinforce the (mostly)factually correct belief that testosterone is what makes us males, which obviously correlates heavily with the attacks on it through various means. In a way, I see this as them sort of "saying the quiet part out loud" again.


This should seem obvious to anyone, since a driving factor amongst males is competition: However, it would be interesting to look at this from the perspective of foids. Whilst they do innately have it easier, they are of course in a competition with another to climb to social & genetic latter & attain the closest equivalent they can of chad. Another perspective on this, would be through our angle: Whilst it is true the modern world has effectively increased competition, it does so in a way which likely is counterintuitive. As males, our testosterone levels are already quite low due to varying factors, so is this perhaps another reason? Let's hypothesize, and consider what we know about modern hypergamy & the issues it brings: Men constantly have to engage in this "competition" type of behavior, which may as a result cause a decrease in it, especially when most men do not receive any kind of "reward" on confirmation of sorts for engaging in this.

In fact, it seems they even state this within the article itself:


This correlates heavily with the lives of most men, whom have to put in excessive amounts of effort on a daily-grind in order to attain what they desire: In contrast, foids lives are the effective opposite, in which competitions may seem more "drawn-out" with a clear defined "win-loss outcome"



This discerns to us what we need to know: Whenever foids are in some kind of "position of power" be it in the stereotypically masculine way, or just through holding power.

This correlates heavily with what we see in the outside world: We see men are becoming somewhat "feminized" through diets, products, LGBTQ+ in the media, and other things done to keep us effectively as "betas" whom only exist to serve as the backbone of society, all with little to no reward. For foids, however, this can explain why they behave the way they do now even more: Whilst a lot of foid behavior is due to their innate biological conditions, it also correlates heavily with the fact that foids are very easy to manipulate & control. As such, they are susceptible to any kind of agenda which is being pushed, and are some of the least-likely to realize it.

In fact, more foids are in positions of power now than ever:














Thus, we can amount to concede that the growth of foids in positions of power will only cause more issues; what else is new? :feelsjuice:

Possibly interested users:


@Chudpreet @based_meme @cvh1991 @Biowaste Removal @wereq @LeFrenchCel @NoIdeaWhatToDo @Pancakecel @Copexodius Maximus @WorthlessSlavicShit @Corvus @KillNiggers @Ron.Belgrade @My Name Jeff @Mortis @To koniec @TBIcel @Uggo Mongo
Damn so many foids in position of power. No wonder America is going down the shitter. I would say don't worry about it. Foids are notoriously bad leaders and even worse workers. Foids think screaming incoherently and loudly is leadership. They can never inspire men or make them motivated. A typical foid leader will just make empty threats, shout or throw a tantrum around those she is supposed to lead. Me personally have never taken female leadership of any sort seriously. They also make their simps and whiteknights do most of their work as workers. Literally a burden on economy and society.
 
Interesting. This only serves as proof for the age-old belief that women are unfit to be leaders, it literally goes against their biology. It's only natural that most great civilizations were patriarchies.
 
How do you come across these studies btw, Do you actively look them up?
 
Surprised there's a significant increase in T-levels in the foids in power despite the fact that they had to suck off their superiors in order to get to those positions in power in the first place, or maybe the study didn't consider that fact:feelshaha:.
 
How do you come across these studies btw, Do you actively look them up?
When you go down the rabbit hole, there's no stopping the curiosity, however depressing might be.
 
Even whites are getting chinked?
Like many said before...foids are getting more masculine while men are getting feminized

this result in only one solution - TROONS

jooking aside what do you think future indictations do you has for humanity or at least western countries genepool by this
 
And even blacks one day too
 
I want to see TERFs reacting to this:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:.
 
We've seen what happen a lot when foids are given a boost in testerorones. Just look at all those tranny school shooters!

Women getting a lot of T, and men getting a lot of estrogen both are bad because sex is biological and doing so is just mismatch a freak of nature and violation of the natural law.
 
i wonder if the opposite is true, that being made subservient and ruled over lowers testosterone?
No clue, but it would make sense & would not surprise me.
if we lived in a sane world this would be extremely alarming. instead we live in a clown world so it's seen as empowering jfl
In an insane world, the individual whom is sane will be seen as insane.
Damn so many foids in position of power. No wonder America is going down the shitter.
It's not just because of that, but yes it's a piece to the puzzle.
I would say don't worry about it. Foids are notoriously bad leaders and even worse workers. Foids think screaming incoherently and loudly is leadership.
Them being in power is quite a concern tbh: Not only are they incompetent as you said, but they will adhere to any agenda pushed on us harder than any male politician would.
They can never inspire men or make them motivated. A typical foid leader will just make empty threats, shout or throw a tantrum around those she is supposed to lead.
I might do a thread concerning foids in power throughout history, and the consequences of it.
Me personally have never taken female leadership of any sort seriously. They also make their simps and whiteknights do most of their work as workers. Literally a burden on economy and society.
Yup, foids have no place in the workforce at all.
Interesting. This only serves as proof for the age-old belief that women are unfit to be leaders, it literally goes against their biology. It's only natural that most great civilizations were patriarchies.
100%, this may be the topic of another thread of mine at some point.
How do you come across these studies btw, Do you actively look them up?
google scholar, research gate, etc.
Surprised there's a significant increase in T-levels in the foids in power despite the fact that they had to suck off their superiors in order to get to those positions in power in the first place, or maybe the study didn't consider that fact:feelshaha:.
Kek.

But it was just examining the behavior when they have power, so ofc that won't be a factor.
I want to see TERFs reacting to this:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:.
GQBZsv.gif

We've seen what happen a lot when foids are given a boost in testerorones. Just look at all those tranny school shooters!

Women getting a lot of T, and men getting a lot of estrogen both are bad because sex is biological and doing so is just mismatch a freak of nature and violation of the natural law.
Yup, it will just accelERate civilizational sink more.
 
Like many said before...foids are getting more masculine while men are getting feminized

this result in only one solution - TROONS

jooking aside what do you think future indictations do you has for humanity or at least western countries genepool by this ?
dude it's the fucking deluded progs trying to create a trans gender race gender free globalist corporate medical debt bitch university mental gymnastically raped and indebted eternally utopia
 
It would also increase our testosterone. They've stolen one of our testosterone boosters, and for what?
 

Similar threads

slashER
Replies
9
Views
302
manletcel1488
manletcel1488
Blackpillapologist
Replies
14
Views
211
LOLI BREEDING
LOLI BREEDING
DarkStarDownBad
Replies
54
Views
1K
La Grande Infamie
La Grande Infamie
ne4rthend
Replies
16
Views
388
lifesucksandyoudie
lifesucksandyoudie
lowz1r
Replies
9
Views
390
Runt171
Runt171

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top