According to certain News articles by feminist & their allies & the such, if foids held more positions of power, the world would see fewer conflicts.
Here's an example of this, from within this article:
-Foids will utilize a crisis to extend their power & overreach, as exemplified by the pandemic
-Everything is twisted in a way to suite women, as hinted by the "
: Muh pandemic was a crisis for gender quality"
However, let's try & compare this to historical accounts of foids holding power: Since oftentimes, history has a manner of "mirroring" itself or having many parallels throughout its accords.
In China, during the waring states period, foid leaders were notably more cruel to their subjects in comparison to their male counterparts.
Not to mention, her reign eventually ended in chaos:
Another example, would be that of Mary the First of England, more commonly known as Bloody Mary
Despite the short duration of her reign, it consisted of a high degree of violence:
powerinplaceproject.com
Now, let's take a look at how this holds up in modERn day comparisons:
In 1982, Margaret Thatcher responded with military action when Argentina invaded and occupied the Falkland Islands. Thatcher made the decision to go to war to recover the islands, despite warnings from several male members of Parliament and her advisers; even Ronald Reagan intervened & urged for peace talks.
www.history.com
Instead, Thatcher went ahead with military action and personally ordered the sinking of the Argentine ship, Belgrano, killing more than 300 sailors.
In 2011, Hillary Clinton lobbied Obama for military action in Libya, going against the council of male leaders including Defense Secretary Robert Gates and national security adviser Thomas Donilon.
Today, much of the most reckless, backstabbing, myopic, and disdainful American foreign policy is the brainchild of Victoria Nuland and Samantha Power, who has quite the track record:
threadreaderapp.com
Now, how do any sort of biological factors play a role? well, let's take a look at some research:
incels.is
This thread I did awhile back discerns information from a journal article as to how when foids are put into positions of power, they tend to exhibit more masculine traits: Of course, this is non-natural for them so it will ultimately, be problematic.
This article claims the following:
Of course again, they "said the quiet part out loud" & basically re-affirmed our beliefs, but then tried to cover it up with the ": Muh Gender stereotypes made them this way bro!1!1!"
Another plausible theory, lies within the fact that due to foids having a noticeably higher stress threshold, which when challenged always tends to run in a frantic disorderly manner- this can be exhibited by foids behavior under other similar circumstances.
Overall takeaway- foids don't belong in power, and are more prone to start and/or execrate conflicts.
Here's an example of this, from within this article:
I love how they have to bring up facts which again, prove our talking points here:
-Foids will utilize a crisis to extend their power & overreach, as exemplified by the pandemic
-Everything is twisted in a way to suite women, as hinted by the "
: Muh pandemic was a crisis for gender quality"However, let's try & compare this to historical accounts of foids holding power: Since oftentimes, history has a manner of "mirroring" itself or having many parallels throughout its accords.
In China, during the waring states period, foid leaders were notably more cruel to their subjects in comparison to their male counterparts.
Ah, le "empathetic gender" striking again.
Not to mention, her reign eventually ended in chaos:
Another example, would be that of Mary the First of England, more commonly known as Bloody Mary
Despite the short duration of her reign, it consisted of a high degree of violence:
Wu Zetian and “Bloody Mary”: Examining History’s Most Demonized Female Leaders — Power In Place
By: Oliva Hom and Julia Price, 2021 Summer Collaborators at Power in Place It’s a sad reality that in this patriarchal world, female leaders face far more criticism when compared to their male counterparts. In addition to shouldering the standard challenges of the political world, female politici
powerinplaceproject.com
Now, let's take a look at how this holds up in modERn day comparisons:
In 1982, Margaret Thatcher responded with military action when Argentina invaded and occupied the Falkland Islands. Thatcher made the decision to go to war to recover the islands, despite warnings from several male members of Parliament and her advisers; even Ronald Reagan intervened & urged for peace talks.
How the Falklands War Cemented Margaret Thatcher's Reputation as the 'Iron Lady' | HISTORY
The 74-day Falklands War became Prime Minister Thatcher's "moment" that burnished her reputation as the Iron Lady.
www.history.com
Instead, Thatcher went ahead with military action and personally ordered the sinking of the Argentine ship, Belgrano, killing more than 300 sailors.
In 2011, Hillary Clinton lobbied Obama for military action in Libya, going against the council of male leaders including Defense Secretary Robert Gates and national security adviser Thomas Donilon.
Today, much of the most reckless, backstabbing, myopic, and disdainful American foreign policy is the brainchild of Victoria Nuland and Samantha Power, who has quite the track record:
Thread by @FistedFoucault on Thread Reader App
@FistedFoucault: Meet Samantha Power: a true believer in "humanitarian intervention" who was jointly responsible in destroying Libya while serving on Obama's National Security Council. She is now head of @USAID and ...…
threadreaderapp.com
Now, how do any sort of biological factors play a role? well, let's take a look at some research:
[Blackpill]Putting Foids In Positions of Power Increases Their Testosterone.
Link to scientific journal-article: https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1509591112 Human biology is typically studied within the framework of sex (evolved, innate factors) rather than gender (sociocultural factors), despite some attention to nature/nurture interactions. Testosterone is...
incels.is
This thread I did awhile back discerns information from a journal article as to how when foids are put into positions of power, they tend to exhibit more masculine traits: Of course, this is non-natural for them so it will ultimately, be problematic.
This article claims the following:
Of course again, they "said the quiet part out loud" & basically re-affirmed our beliefs, but then tried to cover it up with the "
: Muh Gender stereotypes made them this way bro!1!1!"Another plausible theory, lies within the fact that due to foids having a noticeably higher stress threshold, which when challenged always tends to run in a frantic disorderly manner- this can be exhibited by foids behavior under other similar circumstances.
Overall takeaway- foids don't belong in power, and are more prone to start and/or execrate conflicts.
@wereq @WorthlessSlavicShit @based_meme @Chudpreet @Ron.Belgrade @Uggo Mongo @LeFrenchCel @NoIdeaWhatToDo @GeckoBus @Nograsscel @Copexodius Maximus @Biowaste Removal @AsiaCel @Stupid Clown @Grim_Reaper @KillNiggers @cvh1991 @ElTruecel
