Blackpill Black men are popularised by modern media. Blacks dont suffer from the racepill.

[Crustaciouse]

Look around and you constantly see anti white male and pro black male commercials/movies/music.
Black men as a whole have been pushed up by the media and are viewed as "cool" "strong" "and "sexually superior" while white men are now seen as "nerdy" "weak" and "sexually submissive".
Just take a look at this Italian detergent commercial:

The white man is seen as a dweeb and a nuisance. To solve that problem the white woman "upgraded" to a black man (and the black actor is more physically muscular/masculine and attractive than the white man). Signaling to white woman that they should boot white men and get with black men instead (who are being portrayed as superior than white guys).
This is a distinctly black and white phenomenon. Similar media/cultural pieces do not happen with latinos/asians/Indians, the media exclusively seems to be pimping out black men.
This can also be seen being pushed by mainstream leftwing politicians:

The stats also show that black men have more sex partners in life and lose their virginity earlier than white men.
But for some reason in this site and similar groups black men are portrayed to have the same struggles of other "ethniks". When the facts show black men outperform white men in sexual pursuits, while other ethnics like Asians/Indians are far behind.
Black men do not suffer from any sort of racism that would be a detriment to their sexual success, in fact they are constantly being portrayed positively by the media and politicians, thus giving them an even more advantage than other races.

 

[Newbite]

They're portrayed that way cause its true

 

[Zesto]

The white man is seen as a dweeb

Remove the d and it's Gucci.

Just realized this tbhtbhbthbthbthbthbhtbhthbthb

 

[Gremlincel]

Whites who hate themselves for being white should be submerged in pools of permanent skin dye.

 

[tehgymcel420]

tfw not white but not black either.

 

[Deleted member 1042]

Blacks are only status halo'd if they fit into a particular stereotype. Otherwise, you get blackcels.

 

[JJtheIncel]

The reason blacks outslay whites is because they will fuck anything.

 

[Zaetheus]

I DEMAND REPARATIONS FOR MY ANCESTORS!! Where ARE MY FREE WHORES! I’ll rUN BBC GAME IN THEIR THROATS

 

[speedmaxed]

The reason blacks outslay whites is because they will fuck anything.

Agreed on average. Would hate to be them, however. American black men are treated like crap unless they become a celeb or make it to white collar occupations.

Also- slavery masculinized their women so many are beta AF despite the swagger and stratospheric testosterone levels. Couple that with how they get crapped on if they swirl or drop the ghetto act from their own community, and I honestly feel bad for the average black man— even the normies

 

[JJtheIncel]

would they fuck the monkey in ur pic

No hes male
Also
Stop quoting my posts

 

[lastchancel]

Look around and you constantly see anti white male and pro black male commercials/movies/music.
Black men as a whole have been pushed up by the media and are viewed as "cool" "strong" "and "sexually superior" while white men are now seen as "nerdy" "weak" and "sexually submissive".
Just take a look at this Italian detergent commercial:

The white man is seen as a dweeb and a nuisance. To solve that problem the white woman "upgraded" to a black man (and the black actor is more physically muscular/masculine and attractive than the white man). Signaling to white woman that they should boot white men and get with black men instead (who are being portrayed as superior than white guys).
This is a distinctly black and white phenomenon. Similar media/cultural pieces do not happen with latinos/asians/Indians, the media exclusively seems to be pimping out black men.
This can also be seen being pushed by mainstream leftwing politicians:

The stats also show that black men have more sex partners in life and lose their virginity earlier than white men.
But for some reason in this site and similar groups black men are portrayed to have the same struggles of other "ethniks". When the facts show black men outperform white men in sexual pursuits, while other ethnics like Asians/Indians are far behind.
Black men do not suffer from any sort of racism that would be a detriment to their sexual success, in fact they are constantly being portrayed positively by the media and politicians, thus giving them an even more advantage than other races.

 

[Incelazo]

I think it is so unfair.
At the very least europeans brought civilization, what did africans ever do to deserve being at the top?
Protip: raping your own children isnt an accomplishment

 

[Gremlincel]

high iq as FUCK. bbc theory is legit in the west in 2018.

I've seen screenshots of a discord user with the same account name and avatar as this one admitting to being Blackpill101 after reporting servers. Not sure if it's him or some sort of framing, but seeing as he joined yesterday and the discord fiasco went down a while back, it likely is, just as a warning, mods.

 

[Total Imbecile]

Very legit thread, perhaps the hardest racepill to swallow for the ethnicels who pride themselves on being blackpilled on race

 

[Crustaciouse]

Agreed on average. Would hate to be them, however. American black men are treated like crap unless they become a celeb or make it to white collar occupations.

Also- slavery masculinized their women so many are beta AF despite the swagger and stratospheric testosterone levels. Couple that with how they get crapped on if they swirl or drop the ghetto act from their own community, and I honestly feel bad for the average black man— even the normies

Blacks have become a protected class in America.
They can't be criticized, punished, or killed.
While white men are constantly getting hounded by bluepilled whites and every other race.

 

[speedmaxed]

Blacks have become a protected class in America.
They can't be criticized, punished, or killed.
While white men are constantly getting hounded by bluepilled whites and every other race.

Via the media, yes, but they have to claw to the university level + beyond to get them. Therefore, far and away most of the benefits are shifted to black women. Also, State benefits for the welfare class only benefit women. I work in an LA hospital, and god knows there is nobody more shafted atm than young, homeless black males.

 

[RageAgainstTDL]

Huge cope. The media drives nothing.

Nature drives our preferences, and the media just capitalizes on it for profit.

Blacks are the #2 race because they are equally or more athletic than whites, as tall or taller than whites, and more masculine and dominant looking than whites.

While they don't have the beauty of whites, their greater degree of masculinity, low inhib, and their fantastic builds, giant dicks, and athleticism put them in direct competition with whites in the sexual marketplace.

Want a guy who can be attractive to women, but is more dangerous, edgy, and aggressive looking than your standard white guy? Use a black guy.

That's how media looks at it. Because that's our perception when we see a big black guy next to a white guy.

Black men are the only men who look like they can easily cuck a white guy because of their size, dicks, and masculinity, so it's a common trope. It's what white men have feared about blacks since forever. "Black men are going to steal and rape our women!" White men don't say that about Indians or Curries because we don't have the same capacity to physically MOG them. We can't inspire the same fear that black men can.

Saying it's "the media" driving this is the same bullshit argument made about why we perceive all sorts of other things. eg.

• People blame the media for everyone finding black women ugly, when black women are just natural ugly due to excess masculinity and crude features.
• People blame the media for women finding Asian/Indian guys ugly, when these guys are just naturally uglier, shorter, and offer no aesthetic advantages over black and white men.
• People blame the media for Asians worshiping white skin and using skin lightening products, when the entire caste system in India which is thousands of years old was based largely on how dark/light your skin color was.

These points of discrimination and perception come from natural hardwired responses. The media doesn't shape anything. It just gives people what they want to see so it can make money from it.

Black guys have a lot of societal and aesthetic value as described above. So they get a good turn in the media. Indian and Chinese men have almost no unique societal and aesthetic value. So they get no exposure except as betas.

That's all there is to it.

 

[speedmaxed]

Huge cope. The media drives nothing.

Nature drives our preferences, and the media just capitalizes on it for profit.

Blacks are the #2 race because they are equally or more athletic than whites, as tall or taller than whites, and more masculine and dominant looking than whites.

While they don't have the beauty of whites, their greater degree of masculinity, low inhib, and their fantastic builds, giant dicks, and athleticism put them in direct competition with whites in the sexual marketplace.

Want a guy who can be attractive to women, but is more dangerous, edgy, and aggressive looking than your standard white guy? Use a black guy.

That's how media looks at it. Because that's our perception when we see a big black guy next to a white guy.

Black men are the only men who look like they can easily cuck a white guy because of their size, dicks, and masculinity, so it's a common trope. It's what white men have feared about blacks since forever. "Black men are going to steal and rape our women!" White men don't say that about Indians or Curries because we don't have the same capacity to physically MOG them. We can't inspire the same fear that black men can.

Saying it's "the media" driving this is the same bullshit argument made about why we perceive all sorts of other things. eg.

• People blame the media for everyone finding black women ugly, when black women are just natural ugly due to excess masculinity and crude features.
• People blame the media for women finding Asian/Indian guys ugly, when these guys are just naturally uglier, shorter, and offer no aesthetic advantages over black and white men.
• People blame the media for Asians worshiping white skin and using skin lightening products, when the entire caste system in India which is thousands of years old was based largely on how dark/light your skin color was.

These points of discrimination and perception come from natural hardwired responses. The media doesn't shape anything. It just gives people what they want to see so it can make money from it.

Black guys have a lot of societal and aesthetic value as described above. So they get a good turn in the media. Indian and Chinese men have almost no unique societal and aesthetic value. So they get no exposure except as betas.

That's all there is to it.

I think you missed my point. There is way more to life than sex, and far worse things than being a virgin. Call it a cope, but that’s reality

Blacks are #2, sure. That said, I’d rather be a chinese/ indian incel who grew up with two parents and a set of morals - regardless of however BS - than some of the ex-tyrones who rolled up here who never knew what it was like to to have a principled parent. Hell, even a parent who loved them.

Now they’re sitting around treated like trash by the (overwhelmingly female) nursing staff as the HIV/ CHF/ cancer / sepsis chokes out their vitals and realize they never even figured out what life was until it was too late.

Trust me, the shit I’ve seen makes even the gnarliest of basement dwelling agorophobia preferable.

 

[RageAgainstTDL]

I think you missed my point. There is way more to life than sex, and far worse things than being a virgin. Call it a cope, but that’s reality

Blacks are #2, sure. That said, I’d rather be a chinese/ indian incel who grew up with two parents and a set of morals - regardless of however BS - than some of the ex-tyrones who rolled up here who never knew what it was like to to have a principled parent. Hell, even a parent who loved them.

Now they’re sitting around treated like trash by the (overwhelmingly female) nursing staff as the HIV/ CHF/ cancer / sepsis chokes out their vitals and realize they never even figured out what life was until it was too late.

Trust me, the shit I’ve seen makes even the gnarliest of basement dwelling agorophobia preferable.

Oh I have no doubt blacks have all sorts of other problems to deal with - low IQ is another one of them. Low IQ + low inhib is why so many of them become criminals and often violent ones.

I'm just speaking solely from an SMV perspective and on why blacks are portrayed as the "cucker of whites" in the media. It's not the Jews. It's not the media's fault. It's just the best role for them because it's what people expect when they see a big dominant black guy. White men clutch their women closer in a way that they never will around curries or ricecels. So the media plays that up for profit.

 

[speedmaxed]

Oh I have no doubt blacks have all sorts of other problems to deal with - low IQ is another one of them. Low IQ + low inhib is why so many of them become criminals and often violent ones.

I'm just speaking solely from an SMV perspective and on why blacks are portrayed as the "cucker of whites" in the media. It's not the Jews. It's not the media's fault. It's just the best role for them because it's what people expect when they see a big dominant black guy. White men clutch their women closer in a way that they never will around curries or ricecels. So the media plays that up for profit.

Agreed

 

[YungCell]

Whites who hate themselves for being white should be submerged in pools of permanent skin dye.

tfw not white but not black either.

Didn't you say you're pale enough to pass as white?

 

[Morse_Code]

Huge cope. The media drives nothing.

Nature drives our preferences, and the media just capitalizes on it for profit.

Blacks are the #2 race because they are equally or more athletic than whites, as tall or taller than whites, and more masculine and dominant looking than whites.

While they don't have the beauty of whites, their greater degree of masculinity, low inhib, and their fantastic builds, giant dicks, and athleticism put them in direct competition with whites in the sexual marketplace.

Want a guy who can be attractive to women, but is more dangerous, edgy, and aggressive looking than your standard white guy? Use a black guy.

That's how media looks at it. Because that's our perception when we see a big black guy next to a white guy.

Black men are the only men who look like they can easily cuck a white guy because of their size, dicks, and masculinity, so it's a common trope. It's what white men have feared about blacks since forever. "Black men are going to steal and rape our women!" White men don't say that about Indians or Curries because we don't have the same capacity to physically MOG them. We can't inspire the same fear that black men can.

Saying it's "the media" driving this is the same bullshit argument made about why we perceive all sorts of other things. eg.

• People blame the media for everyone finding black women ugly, when black women are just natural ugly due to excess masculinity and crude features.
• People blame the media for women finding Asian/Indian guys ugly, when these guys are just naturally uglier, shorter, and offer no aesthetic advantages over black and white men.
• People blame the media for Asians worshiping white skin and using skin lightening products, when the entire caste system in India which is thousands of years old was based largely on how dark/light your skin color was.

These points of discrimination and perception come from natural hardwired responses. The media doesn't shape anything. It just gives people what they want to see so it can make money from it.

Black guys have a lot of societal and aesthetic value as described above. So they get a good turn in the media. Indian and Chinese men have almost no unique societal and aesthetic value. So they get no exposure except as betas.

That's all there is to it.

Black men are unpopular except with black women. There is data on this out there.

This idea that they have big dicks is not nearly enough to outweigh all the negatives. They lose virginity earlier because they're Africans, ffs. They have extremely low inhib.

 

[RageAgainstTDL]

Black men are unpopular except with black women. There is data on this out there.

This idea that they have big dicks is not nearly enough to outweigh all the negatives. They lose virginity earlier because they're Africans, ffs. They have extremely low inhib.

True they are unpopular except with black women. But all nonwhite men are unpopular with women in general. The difference with blacks is they are taller, stronger, bigger dicked, lower inhib, and more masculine looking.

So that's what they get portrayed as in the media. People want black rappers like 50 Cent, because they like the mythos of the scary black man. It's what they feel when they see blacks, so they want it portrayed in the media.

That's all I'm saying. The media responds to our instincts for profit. It doesn't dictate our beliefs.

Same reason we get Aziz Ansari as the most famous curry in the media. He's a textbook betamale. And that's what people expect from curries. So that's what we get.

 

[Anger]

Once again blacks cannot be incel, they are privileged because the (((((media))))) keep pushing race mixing.

 

[Not_Important]

Most will not admit this

 

[Deleted member 1252]

Whites who hate themselves for being white should be submerged in pools of permanent skin dye.

 

[Flabcel Repulsive]

This is a distinctly black and white phenomenon. Similar media/cultural pieces do not happen with latinos/asians/Indians, the media exclusively seems to be pimping out black men.

In America perhaps. In Sweden the culture hype of the black man extends to every race/phenotype that is not distinctly white European Aryan. It's always cooler to be non-white. Probably because for a long time MENA immigrants have outnumbered blacks in Northern Europe.

Otherwise a truly excellent thread. JBW is such a lie and the attempt by the sexually successful and totally media pampered black race to claim superior incel status over whites is insulting.

 

[Morse_Code]

True they are unpopular except with black women. But all nonwhite men are unpopular with women in general. The difference with blacks is they are taller, stronger, bigger dicked, lower inhib, and more masculine looking.

So that's what they get portrayed as in the media. People want black rappers like 50 Cent, because they like the mythos of the scary black man. It's what they feel when they see blacks, so they want it portrayed in the media.

That's all I'm saying. The media responds to our instincts for profit. It doesn't dictate our beliefs.

Same reason we get Aziz Ansari as the most famous curry in the media. He's a textbook betamale. And that's what people expect from curries. So that's what we get.

Whites are actually the tallest, then blacks. I'm not sure blacks are actually stronger either. Whites and even Asians do better in weightlifting, as I recall.

I've never seen a reliable study on dick size by race, so this could just be a perception created by pornography. The best you can do is assume this based on T levels, but that is highly unscientific.

There is also a selection bias with American blacks. They have been selected for being stronger/more masculine, because people wanted stronger slaves. When I see the average African tribesman, they actually don't strike me as very masculine at all, regardless of T level.

 

[SoCalSuifuel]

All you have yo do is type in white genocide on twitter or tumblr and endless BBC cuckold pornography comes up promoting it all with thousands of likes and retweets. If you're unaware of the fact that the (((West))) is orchestrating the destruction of the white race, you're a fool. Ever since the Jews won WW2, this has been the plan. Currently whites in South Africa are raped and murdered by the government and Western media manipulates the information to make it appear to either not be happening at all, or that it's a good thing that it's happening. The same thing will happen in the United States as well. One of the best ways to accomplish their goals is to get white women to stop producing white children and to hate white men, when white women despise white men then white men are unwilling to fight for them and become completely demoralized. The best way to get white women to crave black dick is to get them to think about it constantly, to associate black guys with sex, and to associate white men with weakness. It's Pavlovian programming, take this clip from the movie Focus as an example of what's going:

No coincidence that the movie has a black man/blonde white woman romantic couple as well. The Jews in Hollywood know exactly what they're doing. They've been slowly seeding this stuff for decades, take this interview with Mel Brooks for example where he talks about a scene he filmed implying all German woman crave BBC (go to two minutes in):

Then there's things like Blacked.com, a pornography company which is promoted on national television by Kanye West, a guy who's met the President of the United States:

Kanye's wife has also met the President, she even went to the White House, and her claim to fame is sucking a black dick on video, she got a reality show for doing so.

I could cite endless examples of this shit in the media, and American society in general. It's an active agenda.

 

[RageAgainstTDL]

Whites are actually the tallest, then blacks. I'm not sure blacks are actually stronger either. Whites and even Asians do better in weightlifting, as I recall.

I've never seen a reliable study on dick size by race, so this could just be a perception created by pornography. The best you can do is assume this based on T levels, but that is highly unscientific.

There is also a selection bias with American blacks. They have been selected for being stronger/more masculine, because people wanted stronger slaves. When I see the average African tribesman, they actually don't strike me as very masculine at all, regardless of T level.

Whites make the best powerlifters because certain classes of white men have the biggest bones and can pack on the most weight. But blacks have exceptional body fat in many cases and great fast twitch muscle making them amazing sprinters and basketball players.

Height is close enough between whites and blacks to be a nondiscriminating issue.

Perhaps there is a selection bias with American blacks. But blacks overall have more gorilla like features of any race which makes them look the most animalistic and thus the scariest. This also goes in combination with their dark skin which is also scary.

Plus blacks are prone to high rates of crime and are notoriously low inhib. Blacks do have bigger dicks but not dramatically.

Hence blacks are portrayed in the media as scary cuck monsters come to steal your white women and dick them from every angle.

Simple point you guys don't seem to be getting - on a physical level, blacks are the only race that can compete with whites, and that's why there is always a black-white rivalry being portrayed in the media.

Furthermore, in real life, whites fear blacks. And blacks envy and resent whites. So this is what you get.

 

[OverIt]

Ture tbh. In America especially being a black male gives you quite a bit of an advantage over white men. Especially now with white Males being stigmatized and degrading publicly. Being white is looked down upon quite a bit here is many areas

 

[SoCalSuifuel]

Huge cope. The media drives nothing.

Nature drives our preferences, and the media just capitalizes on it for profit.

Blacks are the #2 race because they are equally or more athletic than whites, as tall or taller than whites, and more masculine and dominant looking than whites.

While they don't have the beauty of whites, their greater degree of masculinity, low inhib, and their fantastic builds, giant dicks, and athleticism put them in direct competition with whites in the sexual marketplace.

Want a guy who can be attractive to women, but is more dangerous, edgy, and aggressive looking than your standard white guy? Use a black guy.

That's how media looks at it. Because that's our perception when we see a big black guy next to a white guy.

Black men are the only men who look like they can easily cuck a white guy because of their size, dicks, and masculinity, so it's a common trope. It's what white men have feared about blacks since forever. "Black men are going to steal and rape our women!" White men don't say that about Indians or Curries because we don't have the same capacity to physically MOG them. We can't inspire the same fear that black men can.

Saying it's "the media" driving this is the same bullshit argument made about why we perceive all sorts of other things. eg.

• People blame the media for everyone finding black women ugly, when black women are just natural ugly due to excess masculinity and crude features.
• People blame the media for women finding Asian/Indian guys ugly, when these guys are just naturally uglier, shorter, and offer no aesthetic advantages over black and white men.
• People blame the media for Asians worshiping white skin and using skin lightening products, when the entire caste system in India which is thousands of years old was based largely on how dark/light your skin color was.

These points of discrimination and perception come from natural hardwired responses. The media doesn't shape anything. It just gives people what they want to see so it can make money from it.

Black guys have a lot of societal and aesthetic value as described above. So they get a good turn in the media. Indian and Chinese men have almost no unique societal and aesthetic value. So they get no exposure except as betas.

That's all there is to it.

You're so fucking Low-IQ, it's hillarious. If the media couldn't shape people's thoughts and opinions, then it wouldn't even exist in the first place. Why do you think companies pay for advertising? Why do you think think-tanks exist? Propaganda is a real thing that exists and works. Read Edward Bernays, you complete dipshit.

 

[RageAgainstTDL]

You're so fucking Low-IQ, it's hillarious. If the media couldn't shape people's thoughts and opinions, then it wouldn't even exist in the first place. Why do you think companies pay for advertising? Why do you think think-tanks exist? Propaganda is a real thing that exists and works. Read Edward Bernays, you complete dipshit.

Yeah dude the media's so effective at controlling people's minds that the entire collective power of almost everyone within the media united voters against Trump in 2016 and Hilary Clinton coasted to a landslide victory. Oh wait, nope.

Selling Cokes to fat people who want to buy junk food and just need a reminder of what the "cool" brand is is not the same as making women get vagina tingles over a certain race or type of man.

eg. No amount of advertising in the world would make women get horny over short men. It's purely genetic.

 

[SoCalSuifuel]

Yeah dude the media's so effective at controlling people's minds that the entire collective power of almost everyone within the media united Americans against Trump in 2016 and Hilary Clinton coasted to a landslide victory. Oh wait, nope.

Selling Cokes to fat people who want to buy junk food anyway and just need a reminder of what the "cool" brand is is not the same as making women like a certain race or type of man.

eg. No amount of advertising in the world would make women get horny over short men.

The media was advertising for Trump, they told the public he was the anti-establishment candidate despite being a reality TV star who's friends with the Clintons. Do you remember the whole Hillary for prison thing? It didn't happen because it was political theater. Trump was always going to win, he's there to keep dumb white Americans docile and complacent.

The media can do a hell of a lot more than sell cokes to fat people. Read Bernays. Ever heard of WMDs before? The thing that convinced the American public to go to war in the middle east? That was marketing. If the media can convince people to send their children off to war to die, then the media can convince women that certain type of dick is better than others. You're a brainlet.

 

[Existentialcel]

In real life blacks are considered low iq thugs who spend most of their time incarcerated with 4 baby mommas and 6 kids they don’t take care of. Most girls I know detest black dudes. They lose their virgnities at a very young age due to their shitty environments, low inhib, shorter lifespan, and overall ape mentality. Plus they fuck most things that have a hole and can move

 

[RageAgainstTDL]

The media was advertising for Trump, they told the public he was the anti-establishment candidate despite being a reality TV star who's friends with the Clintons. Do you remember the whole Hillary for prison thing? It didn't happen because it was political theater. Trump was always going to win, he's there to keep dumb white Americans docile and complacent.
View attachment 38965View attachment 38966View attachment 38967
The media can do a hell of a lot more than sell cokes to fat people. Read Bernays. Ever heard of WMDs before? The thing that convinced the American public to go to war in the middle east? That was marketing. If the media can convince people to send their children off to war to die, then the media can convince women that certain type of dick is better than others. You're a brainlet.

I was actually around during the WMD thing, not a child, and people WANTED war. It was much more complex than how you're portraying it. There was an enormous amount of bloodlust, and imperialism behind the decision. The Neocons wanted a foothold in the middle east and oil. They thought they could roll in and take it. None of this was hidden. It was out in the open and was part of what convinced most of the Republican base and swing voters it was a good idea.

A massive percent of that population didn't care if there WMDs or not and they weren't hiding that perspective in public. There was loads of evidence that there never were any WMDs and Iraq was no threat. That was never really the point from the Republican party's or Cheney's perspective. People bought into what fed their emotions. They wanted more brown blood and they wanted more vengeance. They wanted to take something back (ie. oil) in exchange for 9/11, which Afghanistan wasn't going to provide. So they believed it would be easy and it would work, and they acted stupidly on that.

Back on topic, though, again, do you believe an advertising campaign could make women hot for short men?

 

[SoCalSuifuel]

I was actually around during the WMD thing, not a child, and people WANTED war. It was much more complex than how you're portraying it. There was an enormous amount of bloodlust, and imperialism behind the decision. The Neocons wanted a foothold in the middle east and oil. They thought they could roll in and take it. None of this was hidden. It was out in the open and was part of what convinced most of the Republican base and swing voters it was a good idea.

A massive percent of that population didn't care if there WMDs or not. There was loads of evidence that there never were any WMDs and Iraq was no threat. That was never really the point from the Republican party's perspective.

Back on topic, again, do you believe an advertising campaign could make women hot for short men?

They wanted war because they were programmed to want war. None of the hijackers were from Iraq and yet the American public was given a hardon for invading Iraq, how do you think that happened. Read Bernays, you'll learn a lot about how wars are sold to the public. If the powers that be desired to make short men attractive to women, they could do it, but they don't desire that so it wont happen. It wouldn't happen overnight, though, it would take at least a century to come to fruition.

All of your beliefs are so ridiculously out of touch with reality, it's pretty pathetic considering how many posts you make and how you clearly think you have something worth saying. Do you know how women were convinced to smoke cigarettes?

 

[RageAgainstTDL]

They wanted war because they were programmed to want war. None of the hijackers were from Iraq and yet the American public was given a hardon for invading Iraq, how do you think that happened. Read Bernays, you'll learn a lot about how wars are sold to the public. If the powers that be desired to make short men attractive to women, they could do it, but they don't desire that so it wont happen. It wouldn't happen overnight, though, it would take at least a century to come to fruition.

All of your beliefs are so ridiculously out of touch with reality, it's pretty pathetic considering how many posts you make and how you clearly think you have something worth saying. Do you know how women were convinced to smoke cigarettes?

- Do you think the media could convince women to want to have sex with short men more than tall men?
- Do you think the media could convince women to want to have sex with Indian/Chinese men more than white men?
- Do you think the media could convince women to want to have sex with ugly men more than handsome men?

 

[SoCalSuifuel]

- Do you think the media could convince women to want to have sex with short men more than tall men?
- Do you think the media could convince women to want to have sex with Indian/Chinese men more than white men?
- Do you think the media could convince women to want to have sex with ugly men more than handsome men?

Yes to the first two, no to the last one. The way propaganda works is that you have to make things look better than their alternative. You can make Black men appear better than White men by always presenting black men as masculine and sexual, while at the same time presenting white men as effeminate, whiny, and asexual. The same could be done with Asians if that's what the media wanted to do, but it would take time. Black men didn't become sex symbols over night, it took the last century (and more) to accomplish that. Obviously you can never make ugly men appear better looking than handsome men, but when it comes to races you can always present a certain race as ugly by using the worst members of their race, and do the opposite with the race you want to promote.

You're low-IQ, so I'll give you a really easy example of how this shit works: Transgenderism. It only took the media about 30 years to convince people to give their little boys female sex hormones and to cut off their dicks. If you can convince people to chemically castrate their sons, you can convince people to do anything.

 

[RageAgainstTDL]

Yes to the first two, no to the last one. The way propaganda works is that you have to make things look better than their alternative. You can make Black men appear better than White men by always presenting black men as masculine and sexual, while at the same time presenting white men as effeminate, whiny, and asexual. The same could be done with Asians if that's what the media wanted to do, but it would take time. Black men didn't become sex symbols over night, it took the last century (and more) to accomplish that.

You're low-IQ, so I'll give you a really easy example of how this shit works: Transgenderism. It only took the media about 30 years to convince people to give their little boys female sex hormones and to cut off their dicks. If you can convince people to chemically castrate their sons, you can convince people to do anything.

Well I disagree with you on that. I don't believe women could ever be convinced to find short men hotter than tall men. Their attraction to tall men is simply genetic. I also don't believe you could convince women that this guy:

Is sexier than an average white guy, unless something enormous changed about white guys where they were all infected with AIDS or something. His facial features and coloration are objectively poorer than an average white man's, and that has nothing to do with the media.

You keep bringing up cases of the media trying to convince people about intellectual subjects. But physical attraction is mostly hardwired. It isn't intellectual. It's a raw sexual instinct that has been driving the species for tens of thousands of years.

Height turns women on. It's sexually dimorphic.

Similarly, Indians and Chinese have been worshiping white skin for thousands of years. Is that "media"? Is that "culture"? Or is whiter skin just objectively more attractive?

Beauty standards have been researched across cultures and even across cultures, most people can agree on what is beautiful or not, because it's evolutionary.

If you believe attraction is not hardwired, then how do you believe in any of the blackpill?

 

[SoCalSuifuel]

Well I disagree with you on that. I don't believe women could ever be convinced to find short men hotter than tall men. Their attraction to tall men is simply genetic. I also don't believe you could convince women that this guy:

Is sexier than an average white guy, unless something enormous changed about white guys where they were all infected with AIDS or something.

You keep bringing up cases of the media trying to convince people about intellectual subjects. But physical attraction is mostly hardwired. It isn't intellectual.

Height turns women on. It's sexually dimorphic.

Similarly, Indians and Chinese have been worshiping white skin for thousands of years. Is that "media"? Is that "culture"? Or is whiter skin just objectively more attractive?

Beauty standards have been researched across cultures and even across cultures, most people can agree on what is beautiful or not, because it's evolutionary.

If you believe attraction is not hardwired, then how do you believe in any of the blackpill?

They wouldn't be using that guy to make them appear attractive, they would be using guys like this:

You're not arguing with any of the points I'm making. The average black guy doesn't look like Idris Elba or Denzel Washington either, but that doesn't stop the narrative of black guys being handsome and super masculine from spreading.

Propaganda does not deal with details, it deals with generalities, and it clearly works because you yourself believe that black men are taller on average than white men, that isn't true, but you believe it because that's what American basketball tells you. The tallest people in the world are in the Netherlands and in Montenegro:

Read Bernays, seriously, read a fucking book, you dumb retard.

 

[RageAgainstTDL]

They wouldn't be using that guy to make them appear attractive, they would be using guys like this:
View attachment 38972View attachment 38973View attachment 38974
You're not arguing with any of the points I'm making. The average black guy doesn't look like Idris Elba or Denzel Washington either, but that doesn't stop the narrative of black guys being handsome and super masculine from spreading.
View attachment 38976View attachment 38977
Propaganda does not deal with details, it deals with generalities, and it clearly works because you yourself believe that black men are taller on average than white men, that isn't true, but you believe it because that's what American basketball tells you. The tallest people in the world are in the Netherlands and in Montenegro:
View attachment 38979
Read Bernays, seriously, read a fucking book, you dumb retard.

I never said black men were taller than whites. I said they are taller than other nonwhites. I am aware of height statistics.

I will try to reiterate the point again.

Whites are the top of the social pyramid. Chinese and Indian men pose no threat to whites' dominance because we are on average 3" shorter and compete in almost no physically demanding sports. There are few to no Indian/Chinese NFL players, basketball players, or UFC fighters. Chinese and Indian men have smaller penises on average. We have low levels of masculinity in our facial features. Chinese and Indian men therefore would make poor candidates for "thugs" or "big dicked cuckers".

So the only race society can use with any consistency to play these roles are black men. Black men compete physically with white men in most professional sports. Blacks have bigger dicks and more animalistic faces. White men have instinctively feared black men for the history of America and the end of slavery. Black men have lower inhibition levels and are more often criminals.

Nothing I've described so far is due to the 'media'. These are simply facts.

People have always wanted and liked edgy entertainment. White men have provided edgy entertainment via nihilistic and antisocial rock music. Blacks have provided it via rap and hip hop, where they play up their strengths as hypersexual low inhib thugs and goons coming to fuck bitches. People buy it because it plays into their natural responses to the fundamental nature of their appearance.

Even if the media made a massive push to try to convince people that Indians were the REAL thugs and the REAL dangerous guys we should be getting our edgy rap from, the public wouldn't go along with it.

Because this guy:

Looks scary and intimidating.

While this guy:

Does not.

It is very easy to find many "scary looking black guys". It is very hard to find "scary looking Indian/Chinese guys".

So from what I observe, the media is just feeding back and amplifying what works and what resonates. And what works is dictated by genetics and evolutionary looks biases.

Looks are not a "social construct". That's bluepilled thinking.

 

[SoCalSuifuel]

So the only race society can use with any consistency to play these roles are black men. Black men compete physically with white men in most professional sports. Blacks have bigger dicks and more animalistic faces. White men have instinctively feared black men for the history of America and the end of slavery. Black men have lower inhibition levels and are more often criminals.

Nothing I've described so far is due to the 'media'. These are simply facts.

"These are simply facts"

Yeah, you're really low-IQ. What's convinced you that they have bigger dicks? Pornography and Hollywood? Or do you go around looking at black guys dicks in the real world every chance you get? Professional sports are show business just like anything else, there's a reason why nearly every team in every American sport is all black, and it's not because blacks are just naturally the best, although that is what you have been led to believe by propaganda. I'm done arguing with you, you type in an incredibly obnoxious style where you space out every single fucking sentence which makes your posts look longer and grander than they actually are.

Read these books, or never speak on this topic again:

Here's a quote you might want to think about:

The fact that you think black people have always been viewed the way they currently are is one of the surest signs that you're fully indoctrinated in the public perception of things. If "White men have instinctively feared black men for the history of America" as you put it, then how do you explain things like this?

Those blacks don't appear to be very scary at all, they almost seem cute. Now think about this, if whites just always inherently viewed blacks as dangerous thugs, why would they keep them as house slaves? Why would they keep them as slaves at all instead of using white slaves? Were all slave owners closet cuckolds that hoped their big brutish slaves would fuck their wives and kill them? No, not quite. White people used to view blacks like dogs. The whole Mandingo slave fantasy thing comes from a novel that was written in the 1950s.

But because the propaganda has been so effective, in your mind you actually view the Mandingo fantasy erotica novel from 1950s as historical information. Seriously, read Bernays.

 

[RageAgainstTDL]

"These are simply facts"

Yeah, you're really low-IQ. What's convinced you that they have bigger dicks? Pornography and Hollywood? Or do you go around looking at black guys dicks in the real world every chance you get? Professional sports are show business just like anything else, there's a reason why nearly every team in every American sport is all black, and it's not because blacks are just naturally the best, although that is what you have been led to believe by propaganda. I'm done arguing with you, you type in an incredibly obnoxious style where you space out every single fucking sentence which makes your posts look longer and grander than they actually are.

Read these books, or never speak on this topic again:
View attachment 38980View attachment 38981
Here's a quote you might want to think about:
View attachment 38982
The fact that you think black people have always been viewed the way they currently are is one of the surest signs that you're fully indoctrinated in the public perception of things. If "White men have instinctively feared black men for the history of America" as you put it, then how do you explain things like this?
View attachment 38983View attachment 38984
Those blacks don't appear to be very scary at all, they almost seem cute. Now think about this, if whites just always inherently viewed blacks as dangerous thugs, why would they keep them as house slaves? Why would they keep them as slaves at all instead of using white slaves? Were all slave owners closet cuckolds that hoped their big brutish slaves would fuck their wives and kill them? No, not quite. White people used to view blacks like dogs. The whole Mandingo slave fantasy thing comes from a novel that was written in the 1950s.
View attachment 38985
But because the propaganda has been so effective, in your mind you actually view the Mandingo fantasy erotica novel from 1950s as historical information. Seriously, read Bernays.

Dude if you don't like me so much, just put me on ignore. I'm not going to change my posting style just for you. And I have no problem continuing to discuss this with you if you like. But I don't know why you are getting so emotional about it. It's just a discussion.

To address the point, I never said "blacks were the best athletes". I said they compete with whites in many sports on an equal playing field which is true. And it is also true that Indians and Chinese cannot compete on the same level so we don't.

People have made jokes over things they fear forever. Cartoons about trying to make blacks look silly doesn't change the fact that blacks have an incredibly high murder, rape, and robbery rate.

People in general fear blacks because blacks kill at a much higher rate than any other race in America:

That's the murder rate in america by race. Blacks are through the roof. So it is the media that makes blacks look like thugs? Or are they actually more often thugs, everyone knows it, and thus that's the image that becomes popular for them?

If you want a genre of music based on drugs, violence, killing, and crime, which race would be better suited for it than blacks based on the statistical crime data?

 

[Solitarian_Walker]

We niggas be thuggin n shieeet

 

[Morse_Code]

Anyway, the ultimate reason black men don't suffer from the race pill is that black women prefer them.

I don't think the interracial advertising actually helps them with other kinds of women. Or if it does, not enough to make them popular on dating apps etc. So OP is certainly wrong here:

Black men do not suffer from any sort of racism that would be a detriment to their sexual success

Not that there's anything wrong with being racist in your preferences.

 

[SoCalSuifuel]

Dude if you don't like me so much, just put me on ignore. I'm not going to change my posting style just for you. And I have no problem continuing to discuss this with you if you like. But I don't know why you are getting so emotional about it. It's just a discussion.

To address the point, I never said "blacks were the best athletes". I said they compete with whites in many sports on an equal playing field which is true. And it is also true that Indians and Chinese cannot compete on the same level so we don't.

People have made jokes over things they fear forever. Cartoons about trying to make blacks look silly doesn't change the fact that blacks have an incredibly high murder, rape, and robbery rate.

People in general fear blacks because blacks kill at a much higher rate than any other race in America:

That's the murder rate in america by race. Blacks are through the roof. So it is the media that makes blacks look like thugs? Or are they actually more often thugs, everyone knows it, and thus that's the image that becomes popular for them?

If you want a genre of music based on drugs, violence, killing, and crime, which race would be better suited for it than blacks based on the statistical crime data?

Just read Bernays, his stuff is light reading, it's not strenuous at all. You will 100% learn some stuff that will make you reexamine how you view the world. And I will never ignore or block any users, defeats the entire purpose of a forum.

 

[Newbite]

tbh

i'm a pastanigger i'm "white"

Nice cope you lil faggot

 

[RageAgainstTDL]

Just read Bernays, his stuff is light reading, it's not strenuous at all. You will 100% learn some stuff that will make you reexamine how you view the world. And I will never ignore or block any users, defeats the entire purpose of a forum.

Perhaps. But don't you think the power of government or media propaganda has been severely diluted by the Internet? So many young people now grow up without even having cable TV. They get their news from the Internet where there are millions of sites providing just as many different views.

I think it's very hard for any entity to push any single ideology anymore unless it's the one people want to buy into. Because you can find any outlet to provide a point of view you agree with.

Want a reason to hate minorities? There are loads of websites to provide skewed "news" to provide that. Want a reason to hate whites? Again, loads of sites to provide "news" to support that.

If I had to speculate, I would guess that the infinite amount of options is allowing people to degenerate more to whatever perspective they believe best suits them or their evolutionary insticts drive them to.

ie. Women profit from feminism and hypergamy so they default into "incels are evil" on HuffPo.
ie. Incels are damaged by feminism and hypergamy so we default into "feminism is evil".
ie. Many white people feel damaged by immigration so they default into "build the wall".

I think people are just feeding whatever natural selfish instincts they have now based on their own perspective, and finding sites and sources that back them on that. While I think it was probably once true that the media or state could speak with one voice and everyone had to listen, I don't think that's likely true anymore.

 

[Hoffman_13]

Great
More race war threads