Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

News Bitchute got take down

End of the free world.

But then again, freedom ended a while back.
 
Some people are really working overtime to make the internet into one big regulated safe space.
 
I had my hentai rape porn stashed over there FeelsBadMan :cryfeels::cryfeels::cryfeels:
 
It's the end of days.
 
The end of free speech.
 
I was able to get in so it’s not totally gone
Oh, no. "Free speech" is just from the government. There isn't a philosophical concept or principle, and the founding fathers totally had in mind that if you shared an opinion unpopular with marxists that hate the USA that you'd lose your livelihood and be cast out as a pariah for all time.

This isn’t anything new though, the banned will ban together and come back as a greater force then before

That’s why it’s actually better to let opposing views stand, because when you ban someone instead of discrediting someone you actually give their cause more power
 
Last edited:
Some people are really working overtime to make the internet into one big regulated safe space.
Tbh we might have to move to the darknet pretty soon
 
do you remember Encarta?
Encarta never pulled this shit.
I do but Encarta was never as comprehensive as Wikipedia.

As a general rule only information having to do with science and technology are helpful to read about on Wikipedia. Everything else having to do with culture, society and people is put through a pro female anti male lens and presents information in a way that avoids making women look bad or responsible for anything bad.
 
I do but Encarta was never as comprehensive as Wikipedia.

As a general rule only information having to do with science and technology are helpful to read about on Wikipedia. Everything else having to do with culture, society and people is put through a pro female anti male lens and presents information in a way that avoids making women look bad or responsible for anything bad.

Encyclopedias are not supposed to use that tone.
 
Encyclopedias are not supposed to use that tone.
Wikipedia also digs into the personal lives of people.
You've ever been a tv show or become a public figure? There's probably an entry on you?
Remember scroogle?
When it was up it had that quote from Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales about how one day there should be an entry for each person alive.

That Wikipedia and urban dictionary have any relevance to the public when they are blatantly biased is sad tbh
 
Wikipedia also digs into the personal lives of people.
You've ever been a tv show or become a public figure? There's probably an entry on you?
Remember scroogle?
When it was up it had that quote from Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales about how one day there should be an entry for each person alive.

That Wikipedia and urban dictionary have any relevance to the public when they are blatantly biased is sad tbh

I remember the entry on Yukio Mishima 10 or so years ago used to say something like, "Mishima was an avid bodybuilder, but he still looked absurd after working out due to his short height and because his legs were scrawny," and "Mishima is an author known for his florid, bathetic prose."
Now his article is much more objective and recognizes his genius, but the old article was an assassination of character and trying to make him seem laughable by people who hated him. It's probably still in the old edit logs.
 
I remember the entry on Yukio Mishima 10 or so years ago used to say something like, "Mishima was an avid bodybuilder, but he still looked absurd after working out due to his short height because his legs were scrawny," and "Mishima is an author known for his florid, bathetic prose."
Now his article is much more objective and recognizes his genius, but the old article was an assassination of character and trying to make him seem laughable by people who hated him. It's probably still in the old edit logs.
That long ago? Not surprised tbh but Wikipedia always had a kind of liberal bias which is why sites like conservapedia and more conservative wikis were created that were biased in favor of conservatives instead of liberals.

Either way I'll never argue with someone again when they say Wikipedia doesn't count as a source because after seeing how the powertripping mods rewrite stories to fit a narrative I can't disagree ngl
 
Oh, no. "Free speech" is just from the government. There isn't a philosophical concept or principle, and the founding fathers totally had in mind that if you shared an opinion unpopular with marxists that hate the USA that you'd lose your livelihood and be cast out as a pariah for all time.
Funny enough, a similar thing to getting cancelled actually happened in postcolonial America and up until the 20th century. Getting "posted" was common, especially after refusing to accept a duel. It was meant to ostracize the person, and sometimes it did.
 
Some people are really working overtime to make the internet into one big regulated safe space.
Worse than that they are trying to make the internet into a place solely meant to bully low status males that do "cringey" things IRL and online ie exist.
 
Leftists hate freedom because it means they can't lie
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top