subhuman
Dazed and bedpilled
★★★★★
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2022
- Posts
- 11,503
It's always kind of cringey to see people attempt to give genetic explanations for things when they otherwise have no knowledge about it except for whatever bs they were fed about evolution in public schools. Usually, they are based on assumptions like "if the parents have it, then the kids will have it" or "if it is selected for, then it possesses some evolutionary advantage". The problem with this is that it's trying to provide a genetic explanation for things that are usually only weakly influenced by genetics and are much more influenced by other factors.
For an example, look at this thread I just found
The reason for this regression is that there are a lot of different factors that go into a child's height, like diet for example. NGL it's kind of low IQ to try and infer a child's genes based on what you think the parent's genes are. This is why if you are going to be making these kinds of arguments, it needs to be more than just broscience. So my response to you, @Blackpillapologist is to keep fighting the good fight. Genetic determinism is mostly just a cope.
This also implies that the notion of foids as "selectors" who better the human race with their judgement, is also low IQ garbage. Foids are just prisoners of the moment. They aren't improving shit. When they fuck chad, they still make incel kids. It's the bitter harvest of a dying bloom.
For an example, look at this thread I just found
The fundamental flaw with eugenics is that the correlation between a trait found in parents and a trait found in children is very weak. There was a famous study done on this where a child's height was compared to their parents height. The result wasn't what you'd think, that tall parents had tall kids and short parents had short kids. It was the opposite: the kids of parents of both extremes tended to regress towards the mean (tall parents had shorter kids, short parents had taller kids).I am a believer in eugenics, I strongly believe people with bad genes should not have biological children. And my own ideology, even in its most liberal forms, would ban me from reproducing.
So I no longer hate femoids for rejecting me. Because i myself believe people like me should not reproduce. I am objectively an inferior human being, and I deserve every bit of misery that befalls on me.
The reason for this regression is that there are a lot of different factors that go into a child's height, like diet for example. NGL it's kind of low IQ to try and infer a child's genes based on what you think the parent's genes are. This is why if you are going to be making these kinds of arguments, it needs to be more than just broscience. So my response to you, @Blackpillapologist is to keep fighting the good fight. Genetic determinism is mostly just a cope.
This also implies that the notion of foids as "selectors" who better the human race with their judgement, is also low IQ garbage. Foids are just prisoners of the moment. They aren't improving shit. When they fuck chad, they still make incel kids. It's the bitter harvest of a dying bloom.