geneticdisaster
Banned
-
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2022
- Posts
- 291
not how it works. tinder is real life on steroids.Imagine if it turned out that most of us are not ugly but that it's just dating apps shenanigans. Like if we could make Tinder show us to women and we'd get dozens of likes in a day, but all the time Tinder was hiding us to make us give them money.
Btw I paid for premium or whatever and still no dice.
Men are not that choosy, A hole is a hole!
In real life there's not 3 man to every woman. And in real life there's no one who stops women from seeing you until you pay up.not how it works. tinder is real life on steroids.
In real life there's not 3 man to every woman. And in real life there's no one who stops women from seeing you until you pay up.
it very much feels this way in real life. men compete for scraps of pussy and humilate/insult/beat each other in the processIn real life there's not 3 man to every woman. And in real life there's no one who stops women from seeing you until you pay up.
It's well documented and I've done experiments myself. Same guy/same pics gets a bunch of matches the first week, then less as time goes buy until it slows down to a trickle. As far as I can tell the vast majority of matches my normiefish accounts get were real, I even get them on the phone regularly. I doubt Tinder is paying women to talk to rando guys on the phone.it doesnt stop you. women are genuinely pressing NO on your account. it just says that some acc liked you, and you have to pay to see them, but these accs are fake or dont even exist.
Sure, but there's still about the equal ratio of men and women, unlike 3:1 or whatever it is on dating apps. That alone makes it much harsher in terms of difficulty.it very much feels this way in real life. men compete for scraps of pussy and humilate/insult/beat each other in the process
have you not considered that the dude (or you) already went through all the accounts in his area? that why youve been getting them only sporadically after first few daysIt's well documented and I've done experiments myself. Same guy/same pics gets a bunch of matches the first week, then less as time goes buy until it slows down to a trickle. As far as I can tell the vast majority of matches my normiefish accounts get were real, I even get them on the phone regularly. I doubt Tinder is paying women to talk to rando guys on the phone.
Sure, but there's still about the equal ratio of men and women, unlike 3:1 or whatever it is on dating apps. That alone makes it much harsher in terms of difficulty.
It's a possibility but I live in a city of 2 million people, so maybe if there's 500 total female accounts in a city of that size.have you not considered that the dude (or you) already went through all the accounts in his area? that why youve been getting them only sporadically after first few days
even if theres a million accounts in ur city (theres not) many of them wont show when you swap cause they will just choose the option "no"It's a possibility but I live in a city of 2 million people, so maybe if there's 500 total female accounts in a city of that size.
But you can't at the same time claim guys are being seen and left-swiped by those foids and that those foids don't exist. Either the guy is somehow getting uglier or there's no female accounts left to swipe on him or he's deliberately getting shown to fewer potential matches. Given that Tinder's purpose is to extract money from guys, my money is on the third possibility.