Beta uprising as an answer?

[Zerosum]

The system teaches men they are disposable. The problem is they underestimate us, they think it’s a weakness. It’s not. Maybe we should show them how disposable we’re really willing to be. A man that’s worth nothing has nothing to lose. We didn’t choose this life, it was imposed on us, maybe we should show this world what we really think about it. 80/20 right? Thats good, means there’s theoretically more of us then there are of them. Even if it’s impossible what else are we supposed to do? Many of us will end up roping anyways, might as well go out with a bang. The first Americans went to war with Britain over a 3% tax, nowadays that tax is up to 37%, If we succeed we could share the women equally amongst ourselves, most of us could even get two or three. We could establish strict shariah law. Let me know if this is just retarded wishful thinking (although you could argue that if we think it is then that’s all it’ll be)

 

[Roscomnadzor]

No beta uprising for your face.

 

[Esoteric7]

All it takes is attention from foids to foil the plan

 

[PersonalityChad]

80/20 right? Thats good, means there’s theoretically more of us then there are of them.

Cope, Incels are an absolute minority. There will never be any "beta uprising" kek

 

[Slut_Annihilator298]

The system teaches men they are disposable. The problem is they underestimate us, they think it’s a weakness. It’s not. Maybe we should show them how disposable we’re really willing to be. A man that’s worth nothing has nothing to lose. We didn’t choose this life, it was imposed on us, maybe we should show this world what we really think about it. 80/20 right? Thats good, means there’s theoretically more of us then there are of them. Even if it’s impossible what else are we supposed to do? Many of us will end up roping anyways, might as well go out with a bang. The first Americans went to war with Britain over a 3% tax, nowadays that tax is up to 37%, If we succeed we could share the women equally amongst ourselves, most of us could even get two or three. We could establish strict shariah law. Let me know if this is just retarded wishful thinking (although you could argue that if we think it is then that’s all it’ll be)

I thought about organizing an uprising of my own (in Call of Duty), but I wasn't too sure about taking all the whores I could with me. Also, I don't know what God would think and whether or not He would approve of my actions.

 

[verybasedindeed]

Nothing like what you described is going to happen in the West, not because a male revolution is far-fetched, but because we do not want our civilization to be Islamic.

Some people here think we should put women in cages and rape them. That is inhumane and stupid. What paleoconservatives like me desire is a society where the vast majority of women are housewives and mothers. Some women of genius could study, work and contribute to society, but most would be at home cooking dinner for their husbands and taking care of the kids.

Women are not going to wear burqas. They are not going to be stoned. They are not going to be put in cages. These are our mothers, our wives, our sisters, our daughters, our cousins, our friends. How could you do something like that?

We want them to be healthy and functional, and only a patriarchal society where women are less powerful can provide that. But this does not mean we are going to enslave and brutalize them.

 

[Zerosum]

Cope, Incels are an absolute minority. There will never be any "beta uprising" kek

Yeah it’s probably just cope but there is evidence to suggest that inceldom is on an extreme rise and the tendency is that it will only get worse. If we work together to try and blackpill a good amount of them then it’s basically untapped potential and theoretically possible. We would just need the stones to bring up arms with the system

 

[Zerosum]

I thought about organizing an uprising of my own (in Call of Duty), but I wasn't too sure about taking all the whores I could with me. Also, I don't know what God would think and whether or not He would approve of my actions.

Just convert to Islam, in Islam it is believed to be righteous to die for the Islamic cause. Besides don’t you think God up there in heaven looking down on our suffering isn’t rooting for us? Perhaps he is testing us to see how far we’re willing to go…

 

[TheJoker]

The Vikings were the original incels. They were dudes who went to different parts of the world and went after women
and riches, because there wasn't any to spare in their country, due to the cultural system. Women were literally only
shagging higher status men (who kept them down and its the same system in the west) this is what happens when
you raise the social status above men in society and it is happening right now.

The traditional answer to a incel society is becoming the Vikings. I recommened we all go to Japan on huge boats.

 

[Zerosum]

Nothing like what you described is going to happen in the West, not because a male revolution is far-fetched, but because we do not want our civilization to be Islamic.

Some people here think we should put women in cages and rape them. That is inhumane and stupid. What paleoconservatives like me desire is a society where the vast majority of women are housewives and mothers. Some women of genius could study, work and contribute to society, but most would be at home cooking dinner for their husbands and taking care of the kids.

Women are not going to wear burqas. They are not going to be stoned. They are not going to be put in cages. These are our mothers, our wives, our sisters, our daughters, our cousins, our friends. How could you do something like that?

We want them to be healthy and functional, and only a patriarchal society where women are less powerful can provide that. But this does not mean we are going to enslave and brutalize them.

If we artificially elevate them to an "equal" status they will always use their given power to pursue chad, it is their nature and the main principle of the blackpill philosophy. If we give them rights they will create incels, they were meant to be enslaved to a certain degree as they seem to enjoy it, look at the rape fetish statistics on women, look at Stockholm syndrome, it’s their nature

 

[MillionBashStream97]

Cope, Incels are an absolute minority. There will never be any "beta uprising" kek

He is including the "60% of men are single now" group, which are just average normies going through a dry spell.

People that had ZERO love, touch or sex, are a minority in this world, and if a "beta uprising" were to occur (Cope, Dope, Crack, Smack), we would be all killed in 20 minutes.

 

[turbosperg]

We want them to be healthy and functional

We Marxist-Rodgerists also do.

We believe the function of a foid is procreation, therefore all foids should be kept in a coma locked in underground breeding barns and used strictly for that, via artificial insemination.

There is nothing "healthy" in a society that allows foids to run about freely, enslaving and seducing men to slave away their entire lives for the benefit of only the foid and the kids she makes with Chads.

No amount of "conservatism" changes the fact that men have always toiled, slaved, warred and died for the benefit of leisurely foids who stayed in comfy homes all through history.

The conservative ideal of the "breadwinner" man is the ideal of a man enslaved to the household foid who gatekeeps his sexuality, and goes on to live an easy NEET life while demanding ever more expensive shit for ever decreasing sexual satisfaction, until the man dies.

This is not a model for a free society.

A free society is a foidless society, where men enjoy 100% of the fruits of his labor, breeds with stacies, and is not a "breadwinning" slave to a decaying old hag, nor is under constant bombardment of pornographic and sensual stimuli designed to extract his resources.

 

[Zerosum]

He is including the "60% of men are single now" group, which are just average normies going through a dry spell.

People that had ZERO love, touch or sex, are a minority in this world, and if a "beta uprising" were to occur (Cope, Dope, Crack, Smack), we would be all killed in 20 minutes.

At least we would be dying for a cause

 

[LeFrenchCel]

Yes.

 

[MillionBashStream97]

At least we would be dying for a cause

I don't know how to argue with people with their arms deep in the cope bucket, so I will just agree to disagree.

 

[verybasedindeed]

If we artificially elevate them to an "equal" status they will always use their given power to pursue chad, it is their nature and the main principle of the blackpill philosophy.

Right.

If we give them rights they will create incels

Once the West is torn down and rebuilt, we are going to restrict most women's rights, for sure. But women are going to have some rights like driving, going out without wearing burqas, choosing what men they want to marry, studying to a certain point, working to a certain point, and so on. The West is Christian, not Muslim. Women are inferior to men, but they should not be treated like slaves. There is no reason to.

they were meant to be enslaved to a certain degree as they seem to enjoy it, look at the rape fetish statistics on women, look at Stockholm syndrome, it’s their nature

I know, but it is also in their nature to seek Chads and you just made it clear that this is wrong, so something being natural is not a valid argument to determine whether it should be applied or not.

Honestly, I believe in self-determination. Do what you Muslims want there and we do what we want here. Simple.

 

[Friday I'm In Love]

At least we would be dying for a cause

"Almost there boyoos we can get puss-ACK"

 

[verybasedindeed]

We Marxist-Rodgerists also do.

We believe the function of a foid is procreation, therefore all foids should be kept in a coma locked in underground breeding barns and used strictly for that, via artificial insemination.

There is nothing "healthy" in a society that allows foids to run about freely, enslaving and seducing men to slave away their entire lives for the benefit of only the foid and the kids she makes with Chads.

No amount of "conservatism" changes the fact that men have always toiled, slaved, warred and died for the benefit of leisurely foids who stayed in comfy homes all through history.

The conservative ideal of the "breadwinner" man is the ideal of a man enslaved to the household foid who gatekeeps his sexuality, and goes on to live an easy NEET life while demanding ever more expensive shit for ever decreasing sexual satisfaction, until the man dies.

This is not a model for a free society.

A free society is a foidless society, where men enjoy 100% of the fruits of his labor, breeds with stacies, and is not a "breadwinning" slave to a decaying old hag, nor is under constant bombardment of pornographic and sensual stimuli designed to extract his resources.

The amount of cheating was very low in conservative times, sexless marriages were not as common, men cherised and valued their women, almost every man had a wife and kids, women were more satisfied than they are now with feminism, hypergamy was moderate, promiscuity was bashed, almost every man had a job, a house, a car, and a family, divorce was unheard of, race-mixing was rare, and so on.

Paleoconservatism is the way forward. The West needs patriarchy, traditional values, nationalism, and Christianity. But you Marxist-Rodgerists can build your ideal nation elsewhere.

 

[Zerosum]

Once the West is torn down and rebuilt, we are going to restrict most women's rights, for sure. But women are going to have some rights like driving, going out without wearing burqas, choosing what men they want to marry, studying to a certain point, working to a certain point, and so on. The West is Christian, not Muslim. Women are inferior to men, but they should not be treated like slaves. There is no reason to.

You give them an inch, they’ll take a mile

 

[turbosperg]

The amount of cheating was very low in conservative times, sexless marriages were not as common, men cherised and valued their women, almost every man had a wife and kids, women were more satisfied than they are now with feminism, hypergamy was moderate, promiscuity was bashed, almost every man had a job, a house, a car, and a family, divorce was unheard of, race-mixing was rare, and so on.

Paleoconservatism is the way forward. The West needs patriarchy, traditional values, nationalism, and Christianity. But you Marxist-Rodgerists can build your ideal nation elsewhere.

The mythical 1950's toothpaste isn't going back into the tube, brother.

Basically your choices as a western man are down to Islam, savagery (but I repeat myself) and Marxism-Rodgerism, which is the way forward.

 

[Friezacel]

Would be the only way to end inceldom for most men but this will never happen because most guys have been conditioned to be obedient pussies

 

[WAFFLEMASTER205]

Would be the only way to end inceldom for most men but this will never happen because most guys have been conditioned to be obedient pussies

hmm is that so.

 

[weaselbomber]

Not happening

 

[WAFFLEMASTER205]

At least we would be dying for a cause

true.

 

[blackpillednigga]

Nothing like what you described is going to happen in the West, not because a male revolution is far-fetched, but because we do not want our civilization to be Islamic.

Some people here think we should put women in cages and rape them. That is inhumane and stupid. What paleoconservatives like me desire is a society where the vast majority of women are housewives and mothers. Some women of genius could study, work and contribute to society, but most would be at home cooking dinner for their husbands and taking care of the kids.

Women are not going to wear burqas. They are not going to be stoned. They are not going to be put in cages. These are our mothers, our wives, our sisters, our daughters, our cousins, our friends. How could you do something like that?

We want them to be healthy and functional, and only a patriarchal society where women are less powerful can provide that. But this does not mean we are going to enslave and brutalize them.

as someone raised in an islamic environment I agree with you. I dont want sex slaves I just want a faithful foid that isnt a feminist. I dont mind them not being housewives either as long as they're faithful to me

 

[WAFFLEMASTER205]

We Marxist-Rodgerists also do.

We believe the function of a foid is procreation, therefore all foids should be kept in a coma locked in underground breeding barns and used strictly for that, via artificial insemination.

There is nothing "healthy" in a society that allows foids to run about freely, enslaving and seducing men to slave away their entire lives for the benefit of only the foid and the kids she makes with Chads.

No amount of "conservatism" changes the fact that men have always toiled, slaved, warred and died for the benefit of leisurely foids who stayed in comfy homes all through history.

The conservative ideal of the "breadwinner" man is the ideal of a man enslaved to the household foid who gatekeeps his sexuality, and goes on to live an easy NEET life while demanding ever more expensive shit for ever decreasing sexual satisfaction, until the man dies.

This is not a model for a free society.

A free society is a foidless society, where men enjoy 100% of the fruits of his labor, breeds with stacies, and is not a "breadwinning" slave to a decaying old hag, nor is under constant bombardment of pornographic and sensual stimuli designed to extract his resources.

agree

 

[WAFFLEMASTER205]

The system teaches men they are disposable. The problem is they underestimate us, they think it’s a weakness. It’s not. Maybe we should show them how disposable we’re really willing to be. A man that’s worth nothing has nothing to lose. We didn’t choose this life, it was imposed on us, maybe we should show this world what we really think about it. 80/20 right? Thats good, means there’s theoretically more of us then there are of them. Even if it’s impossible what else are we supposed to do? Many of us will end up roping anyways, might as well go out with a bang. The first Americans went to war with Britain over a 3% tax, nowadays that tax is up to 37%, If we succeed we could share the women equally amongst ourselves, most of us could even get two or three. We could establish strict shariah law. Let me know if this is just retarded wishful thinking (although you could argue that if we think it is then that’s all it’ll be)

hmm intresting.

 

[WuhanFriedPuppies]

Nothing like what you described is going to happen in the West, not because a male revolution is far-fetched, but because we do not want our civilization to be Islamic.

Some people here think we should put women in cages and rape them. That is inhumane and stupid. What paleoconservatives like me desire is a society where the vast majority of women are housewives and mothers. Some women of genius could study, work and contribute to society, but most would be at home cooking dinner for their husbands and taking care of the kids.

Women are not going to wear burqas. They are not going to be stoned. They are not going to be put in cages. These are our mothers, our wives, our sisters, our daughters, our cousins, our friends. How could you do something like that?

We want them to be healthy and functional, and only a patriarchal society where women are less powerful can provide that. But this does not mean we are going to enslave and brutalize them.

>paleo-cuckservative

If given the choice, women will almost always choose to exploit male biology for profit rather than be a housewife, a mother, and/or a sister.

Men are required to die for the preservation of their community. Is it too much to require women to procreate for the same goal?

 

[verybasedindeed]

If given the choice

Then we won't give them that choice, and they'll follow us because we're physically and mentally superior to them. Simple.

 

[Fifita]

Not happening anytime soon

 

[AsiaCel]

Glowie...but there won't be violent uprising, but meek downrising. Neetdom will take hold and eventually society will be forced to do something bout us

 

[Antorian]

We want them to be healthy and functional, and only a patriarchal society where women are less powerful can provide that. But this does not mean we are going to enslave and brutalize them.

You do know the only way we can have a peaceful and prosperous civilization is if women have no right at all to choose whom them marry, right?
Nor should they be allowed to have any say in politics or be in the workforce.
Also divorce should be abolished, premarital sex heavily discouraged (perhaps even having a legal penalty) and infidelity grievous consequences (I'm in favor of death or lashing for the female, and castration for the male, as well as extreme social shaming for both on top of that).

Otherwise I absolutely refuse to die and fight for society's sake. If I don't have many benefits, no stake in the race, why should I sacrifice myself?

 

[verybasedindeed]

You do know the only way we can have a peaceful and prosperous civilization is if women have no right at all to choose whom them marry, right?

By having the right to choose, I obviously did not mean that dating apps would be a thing. Women could marry men from their churches, schools, neighborhoods, and so on. Of course arranged marriage would exist, but in no way could it be the norm. Arranged marriage often leads to infidelity, unhappiness, divorce, and murder.

Nor should they be allowed to have any say in politics or be in the workforce.

That would be the case for the most part, but I would not turn my back on bright minds irrespective of sex.

Also divorce should be abolished

It should be prohibited in most cases. Divorce is just monkeybranching on the woman's part nine times out of ten.

However, there are a few cases when someone is heavily abused in the relationship and nothing can be done about it because the abuser refuses or is unable to change.

"Should have chosen more wisely"? That is easy to say, but sometimes the person was nice at the beginning and became a monster at the end, so divorce should be permitted before a tragedy happens.

premarital sex heavily discouraged

Agreed.

and infidelity grievous consequences (I'm in favor of death or lashing for the female, and castration for the male, as well as extreme social shaming for both on top of that).

Too vile for the West. Maybe in Muslim countries.

Otherwise I absolutely refuse to die and fight for society's sake. If I don't have many benefits, no stake in the race, why should I sacrifice myself?

Honestly, some people are just too burned out to do anything. This is not a personal attack but an observation. I want the White race and its cultures to survive, which includes the West, and women to be put in their place like in conservative times. None of the women were put in cages back then and they were fine. We just got to bring it back.

 

[curryboy420]

Stfu nigger nobody is doing shit nowadays. They didn't say it's over as a joke

 

[Lonelyus]

Nothing like what you described is going to happen in the West, not because a male revolution is far-fetched, but because we do not want our civilization to be Islamic.

Some people here think we should put women in cages and rape them. That is inhumane and stupid. What paleoconservatives like me desire is a society where the vast majority of women are housewives and mothers. Some women of genius could study, work and contribute to society, but most would be at home cooking dinner for their husbands and taking care of the kids.

Women are not going to wear burqas. They are not going to be stoned. They are not going to be put in cages. These are our mothers, our wives, our sisters, our daughters, our cousins, our friends. How could you do something like that?

We want them to be healthy and functional, and only a patriarchal society where women are less powerful can provide that. But this does not mean we are going to enslave and brutalize them.

"These are our" Then they proceeds to talk aboit theyre high bodycount, Almost all female mouth has sucked dick

 

[verybasedindeed]

"These are our" Then they proceeds to talk aboit theyre high bodycount, Almost all female mouth has sucked dick

I laid the foundation for an ideal society. The whores you are talking about would be dealt with.

 

[Lonelyus]

I laid the foundation for an ideal society. The whores you are talking about would be dealt with.

"Accordingly" Theyre holes are used up so might aswell kill them

 

[verybasedindeed]

"Accordingly" Theyre holes are used up so might aswell kill them

No, we could simply encourage promiscuous women to marry promiscuous men. That would be over in one or two generations, as future children would be taught to restrain themselves until marriage.

 

[Lonelyus]

No, we could simply encourage promiscuous women to marry promiscuous men. That would be over in one or two generations, as future children would be taught to restrain themselves until marriage.

Your too polite letting them go on, What a cuck.

 

[verybasedindeed]

Your too polite letting them go on, What a cuck.

Not sure where you are from, but Westerners are not savages.

 

[Lonelyus]

Not sure where you are from, but Westerners are not savages.

Im nordic and we vikings were based

 

[Lonelyus]

Not sure where you are from, but Westerners are not savages.

Not letting them enter heaven or valhalla

 

[Zerosum]

That would be the case for the most part, but I would not turn my back on bright minds irrespective of sex.

Never thought I’d find a feminist in an incel forum, dude’s a purplepiller at most

 

[verybasedindeed]

Never thought I’d find a feminist in an incel forum, dude’s a purplepiller at most

I'm not a feminist, as I don't believe in equality. I'm just saying a few bright women could spawn and contribute to society. What's the big deal? 99% of women are suited for the housewife and mother lifestyle. I'm just saying there's always going to be an exception and we should make use of it. But if you're not White, I don't want you thumbing your nose at this, because you won't have a say in White society.

 

[Zerosum]

I'm not a feminist, as I don't believe in equality. I'm just saying a few bright women could spawn and contribute to society. What's the big deal? 99% of women are suited for the housewife and mother lifestyle. I'm just saying there's always going to be an exception and we should make use of it. But if you're not White, I don't want you thumbing your nose at this, because you won't have a say in White society.

The words "Bright" and "Women" aren’t really synonymous, we shouldn’t trust any exceptions

 

[verybasedindeed]

The words "Bright" and "Women" aren’t really synonymous, we shouldn’t trust any exceptions

Alright then. We'll have it your way.

 

[Logic55]

wtf? Having 3 wives is degenerate. Monogamy is what we should abide by, not polygamy. A man should be loyal to his wife, and she is expected to be loyal to him, Thats the point of marriage, a strong union with your one true love

 

[Zerosum]

wtf? Having 3 wives is degenerate. Monogamy is what we should abide by, not polygamy. A man should be loyal to his wife, and she is expected to be loyal to him, Thats the point of marriage, a strong union with your one true love

Never said anything about marriage here, no marriage for your face. We’re talking about gathering sex slaves post-uprising as no hole would willingly "consent" to accept marriage with an incel.

Also effectively and theoretically one of the main principles of blackpill is that the concept you refer to as "love" doesn’t exist without chad being in the equation. It would be purely transactional (in a way that greatly favors the woman) as it would lack genuine desire in part of the female.

Anything post-carousel and post-wall with a betabuxxer is the woman settling for her last resort, not first option. That would be due to failed attempts at securing chad in her youth when she had high sexual marketplace value.

"Marriage" and "love" effectively don’t exist without chad in the equation, any other notion is cope.

Refer to the wiki for more information - "marriage is a system of legalized prostitution by which a man bribes a woman with food/drink,shelter, emotional security, employment stability, transportation service, an expensive ring and a lavish wedding. This comes in exchange for letting him have regular sex and to know who his children are through institutionalized long term monogamy (in practice, this promise is only broken in 3.4% of all childbirths). This description of marriage does not even constitute all that women may be entitled to in a marriage, but it does constitute the most a man is expected to receive. The symbol of marriage is the future husband going down on one knee offering an expensive diamond ring to the woman. There is a reason why women hate to be the ones to propose like this, because most of the barter is supposed to be on the male side."

 

[Nig nog pilled]

No beta uprising for your face.