Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

RageFuel Being rich isn't enough anymore

M

MajorThomas666

It's all so tiresome
-
Joined
Nov 26, 2025
Posts
2,805
Online time
21h 4m
Women are mogging men in wealth and will eventually overtake them due to DEI and intentional disenfranchise of white men (but also all men). Well, I shouldn't say all men, rather, anyone but Chad and HTN's.

While this is purposeful, being rich and even mid looking will not work anymore. Except for copes, you are just as likely to be KHV as a rich mid 5'8 guy than a poor sub5.

In my rural town, my former babysitter is a former multi-millionaire playboy model, my other former babysister married a Goldman Sachs banker and works at a multi-billion dollar media company. My neighbor's daughter is a renown fashion designer worth millions, my other neighbor's daughter is a doctor and has an OF on the side but doesn't show face. My cousin married a famous guitarist worth millions and works for Microsoft. She makes at least 100,000+ a year, give or take.

Apparently women are poor, but I don't see it where I am. They all are doing quite well for themselves and could never be with a guy that makes less than them by even a minute amount, never mind a poor guy.

Where rich men are fine with golddiggers, rich women are not. If they make 100,000, they want a man to make a seven figure salary.

There are obviously exceptions to the rule, but you also have to keep in mind that security is very important for women, and if they can securitize their priorities/necessities without a man, than all that's left is lookism, status as a form of boasting, dark triad and height.
 
Last edited:
It always comes down to looks and height at the end of the day
 
It does. It really does. Now that women are securer than ever, and men less so, the
Majority of womens' priorities for a mate are looks and height, but they also have to make more than them. Which means, as I said, being mid and rich won't save you.
It always comes down to looks and height at the end of the day
 
I am going to move to a secluded piece of land as soon as possible to get away from this dogshit cucked and ruined society as much as possible. I don't care anymore, I will already die alone why not die alone on my own terms.
 
It hasn't been for a long time, ever heard of this guy named Elliot Rodger?
 
I am going to move to a secluded piece of land as soon as possible to get away from this dogshit cucked and ruined society as much as possible. I don't care anymore, I will already die alone why not die alone on my own terms.
Fellow Unabombercel
 
I am going to move to a secluded piece of land as soon as possible to get away from this dogshit cucked and ruined society as much as possible. I don't care anymore, I will already die alone why not die alone on my own terms.
Yes. Having rural land and an abode free of people and surveillance is what all elites have and try to disenfranchise you to not have
 
Women are mogging men in wealth and will eventually overtake them due to DEI and intentional disenfranchise of white men (but also all men). Well, I shouldn't say all men, rather, anyone but Chad and HTN's.

While this is purposeful, being rich and even mid looking will not work anymore. Except for copes, you are just as likely to be KHV as a rich mid 5'8 guy than a poor sub5.

In my rural town, my former babysitter is a former multi-millionaire playboy model, my other former babysister married a Goldman Sachs banker and works at a multi-billion dollar media company. My neighbor's daughter is a renown fashion designer worth millions, my other neighbor's daughter is a doctor and has an OF on the side but doesn't show face. My cousin married a famous guitarist worth millions and works for Microsoft. She makes at least 100,000+ a year, give or take.

Apparently women are poor, but I don't see it where I am. They all are doing quite well for themselves and could never be with a guy that makes less than them by even a minute amount, never mind a poor guy.

Where rich men are fine with golddiggers, rich women are not. If they make 100,000, they want a man to make a seven figure salary.

There are obviously exceptions to the rule, but you also have to keep in mind that security is very important for women, and if they can securitize their priorities/necessities without a man, than all that's left is lookism, status as a form of boasting, dark triad and height.
Wealth has always been a stopgap on the ratchet of female hypergamy. Even in its original form, an ugly man had to be wildly more wealthy than a woman to be a compelling option to her. But as hypergamy marches to asymptotic end, like you said, any and all effect of extrinsic obtainable riches falls away in favor of intrinsic immutable genetic wealth.

No amount of money can change what a man really is, which is nothing more than a set of randomly selected genes; nor can it change what a woman really is, which nothing more than is a brutal selector of those sets of randomly selected genes.

Take the Meekspill.
 
Last edited:
VAGINAS ARE MYSTERIOUS PUZZLES
 
It hasn't been for a long time, ever heard of this guy named Elliot Rodger?
Elliot wasn't that rich, his father went into a lot of debt but comparitvely yes he was to us.
 

Similar threads

esdeathlover
Replies
30
Views
2K
esdeathlover
esdeathlover
M
Serious Short men
Replies
6
Views
851
Cosmicsdorito
Cosmicsdorito
Doomed4ever
Replies
35
Views
2K
GoyimLivesMatter
GoyimLivesMatter
M
Replies
0
Views
354
MajorThomas666
M

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top