Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

being non NT and not having any friends doesn't justify your inceldom

Villain

Villain

Banned
-
Joined
Sep 3, 2018
Posts
1,899
I always read posts here talking about being non-NT not having any friends, not good in socializing and using it to justify their inceldom. They are also the same people who put :chad: when other users state about having a friend or talking to the opposite gender.They sound like if they are NT,learn basic socialization and watnut they would ascend. I know that being attractive makes the world open up to you and being ugly makes it harder to socialize but its not impossible for an unattractive male to make any friends or become decent in socializing.I feel like they are only "incel" because they never tried to work on socializing and is awkward as fuck irl and refer it as being "autistic/mentalcel" to make it look like they dont have any control about it.

Think about it who is more believable to be incel
Guy who avoids socializing, never tried talking to a woman, doesn't have any friends.
Guy who's good in socializing, lots of friends but still cant find a partner because of his face, height etc on things which he literally cant control
 
:chad: coping tbh. Lol @ U
 
Right, autistic non-NT chad will mog the shit out of the entire forum
 
being ugly does
 
Cope. Foids care about your genetics, not social skills. A 4/10 or sub5 who does a good job at socialmaxxing is still incel and will never have a foid attracted to him.
 
Think about it who is more believable to be incel
Guy who avoids socializing, never tried talking to a woman, doesn't have any friends.
Guy who's good in socializing, lots of friends but still cant find a partner because of his face, height etc on things which he literally cant control

The former knows its over because hes a 1/10, the latter is still trying because hes a 5/10 and a fakecel

If youre legit ugly there is no point in trying, its like saying to a poor person just go to your bank and ask them for free $10mil, you cant know they will say no without trying bro
 
Cope. Foids care about your genetics, not social skills. A 4/10 or sub5 who does a good job at socialmaxxing is still incel and will never have a foid attracted to him.
The former knows its over because hes a 1/10, the latter is still trying because hes a 5/10 and a fakecel

If youre legit ugly there is no point in trying, its like saying to a poor person just go to your bank and ask them for free $10mil, you cant know they will say no without trying bro
whats the cope about my post read it again its entirely your argument. True incels are incels whether or not they are good in socializing but why limit yourself of not having any friends thats my point. But there are people here who use "autism/mental" to make it look like they have no control about it
because having friends=you're good looking.
 
whats the cope about my post read it again its entirely your argument. True incels are incels whether or not they are good in socializing but why limit yourself of not having any friends thats my point. But there are people here who use "autism/mental" to make it look like they have no control about it
Its cope because it doesnt make you more attractive to foids. Socializing doesnt change the bones in your face, skeleton, or the colour of your skin (race). Being social alone will not make a foid attracted to you. You still need to meet a minimum looks (face + height + race) requirement first. Those are being a minimum of 6/10 face, white, 6'0" height. If below 6'0" but still taller than the foid, the minimum face requirement becomes 7/10, still white. If you are ethnic (non-white), its top 5% of SMV for your race or nothing
 
Its cope because it doesnt make you more attractive to foids. Socializing doesnt change the bones in your face, skeleton, or the colour of your skin (race). Being social alone will not make a foid attracted to you. You still need to meet a minimum looks (face + height + race) requirement first. Those are being a minimum of 6/10 face, white, 6'0" height. If below 6'0" but still taller than the foid, the minimum face requirement becomes 7/10.
quote the sentence where i say socializing makes you attractive to women. Even my last example is an evidence that I believe that real incels cant find a partner even he is good in socializing because of his genetics
Guy who's good in socializing, lots of friends but still cant find a partner because of his face, height etc on things which he literally cant control
My Point is there are other uses "incel" who uses terms like "austic/mental" to justify being incel which is not enough especially if they are not diagnosed medically as mentally handicapped and being good in socializing, having friends doesnt make you a chad
 
Its cope because it doesnt make you more attractive to foids. Socializing doesnt change the bones in your face, skeleton, or the colour of your skin (race). Being social alone will not make a foid attracted to you. You still need to meet a minimum looks (face + height + race) requirement first. Those are being a minimum of 6/10 face, white, 6'0" height. If below 6'0" but still taller than the foid, the minimum face requirement becomes 7/10, still white. If you are ethnic (non-white), its top 5% of SMV for your race or nothing
JFL you two are on the same side for this, not being NT doesn’t matter for SMV.
 
I always read posts here talking about being non-NT not having any friends, not good in socializing and using it to justify their inceldom. They are also the same people who put :chad: when other users state about having a friend or talking to the opposite gender.They sound like if they are NT,learn basic socialization and watnut they would ascend. I know that being attractive makes the world open up to you and being ugly makes it harder to socialize but its not impossible for an unattractive male to make any friends or become decent in socializing.I feel like they are only "incel" because they never tried to work on socializing and is awkward as fuck irl and refer it as being "autistic/mentalcel" to make it look like they dont have any control about it.

Think about it who is more believable to be incel
Guy who avoids socializing, never tried talking to a woman, doesn't have any friends.
Guy who's good in socializing, lots of friends but still cant find a partner because of his face, height etc on things which he literally cant control

So you can control autism? You can turn a non NT to a NT by reading some words in a book? The first example you gave know there is zero chance from the start by being born the lowest of the low. It's like telling a guy in a wheelchair since he was born, "just try bro, maybe your legs will work"
 
So you can control autism? You can turn a non NT to a NT by reading some words in a book? The first example you gave know there is zero chance from the start by being born the lowest of the low. It's like telling a guy in a wheelchair since he was born, "just try bro, maybe your legs will work"
read it again
feel like they are only "incel" because they never tried to work on socializing and is awkward as fuck irl and refer it as being "autistic/mentalcel" to make it look like they dont have any control about it.
"refer"
 
Not in and of itself, correct. I think a lot incel users of sites like these have some trauma from being rejected and confuse that with being "non NT".
 
read it again

"refer"

I just don't understand where you take the assumptions that someone who have an unchangeable mental illness is volcel compared to a guy who has a decent normal life and is lonely. This is two different ball game.

Here's a better examples.

Guy (short and ugly with autism that cannot be changed, and which he literally cant control since the brain wired that way) who avoids socializing, never tried talking to a woman, doesn't have any friends.

Guy (short and ugly, who can be changed by surgery and leg lengthening surgery) who's good in socializing, lots of friends but still cant find a partner because of his face, height etc on things which he literally cant control

Which one would be closer to ascend?
 
So you can control autism? You can turn a non NT to a NT by reading some words in a book? The first example you gave know there is zero chance from the start by being born the lowest of the low. It's like telling a guy in a wheelchair since he was born, "just try bro, maybe your legs will work"
and being non NT doesnt stop you from making friends nor socializing nor a form of autism. There are a lot of people who are awkward and non-nt but dont treat it as autism/mental that gives them no hope of functioning properly which a lot of people here do.
"Im non-nt, and cant socialize thats why i have no friends huhuhu thats why i assure you im an incel"
"you have friends fucking / you talk to a female :chad: "
I just don't understand where you take the assumptions that someone who have an unchangeable mental illness is volcel compared to a guy who has a decent normal life and is lonely. This is two different ball game.

Here's a better examples.

Guy (short and ugly with autism that cannot be changed, and which he literally cant control since the brain wired that way) who avoids socializing, never tried talking to a woman, doesn't have any friends.

Guy (short and ugly, who can be changed by surgery and leg lengthening surgery) who's good in socializing, lots of friends but still cant find a partner because of his face, height etc on things which he literally cant control

Which one would be closer to ascend?
how about guy who got autism vs short and ugly you're example is stupid because they are both short and ugly.. Meanwhile mentalcels(who referred as mentalcels) here are often tall and avg looking
better example duh ..
 
Last edited:
and being non NT doesnt stop you from making friends nor socializing nor a form of autism. There are a lot of people who are awkward and non-nt but dont treat it as autism/mental that gives them no hope of functioning properly which a lot of people here do.
"Im non-nt, and cant socialize thats why i have no friends huhuhu thats why i assure you im an incel"
"you have friends fucking / you talk to a female :chad: "
An non NT/Autism with an extroverted personality will have easier time making friend/gf in his circle of peoples. For introverts that is isolated with no social skills, finding frienships/love is nearly impossible without immense help. Which is in both examples, have slimmer chance to happen versus a neurotipical that can go out there.

how about guy who got autism vs short and ugly you're example is stupid because they are both short and ugly.. Meanwhile mentalcels(who referred as mentalcels) here are often tall and avg looking
better example duh ..

I set both of my examples a short and ugly from the start because if there are here, they don't look like chads.
Mentalcels can varry but are much more likely to be uglier than the average, otherwise their good look would have been noticed by womens, and they would have been in relationships a long time ago.

To me the only "fakecels" are the ones that have been in a relationship before, not counting escortmaxxing.


Edit: My phone fucked up a part of my repky inside the reply you made.
 
Think about it who is more believable to be incel
Guy who avoids socializing, never tried talking to a woman, doesn't have any friends.
Guy who's good in socializing, lots of friends but still cant find a partner because of his face, height etc on things which he literally cant control
First guy. Because when you're ugly people avoid you like the plague.

I don't believe truecels have any real friends. So I don't believe the second guy exists in the same way a mythical animal doesn't .
 
I set both of my examples a short and ugly from the start because if there are here, they don't look like chads.
I dont know about that. There are a tall people here and if you still dont notice a lot of those tall are the one who call themselves mentalcel
 
The most popular guys in school who had the most friends were always the good looking guys. The guys that had no friends and were bullied were either weak, ugly or both.

I don’t think that’s a coincidence. I’ve been working everyday since I was 16 years old and work is no different than Highschool, people are just more sly and will talk behind your back instead of just outright bullying you.
 
First guy. Because when you're ugly people avoid you like the plague.

I don't believe truecels have any real friends. So I don't believe the second guy exists in the same way a mythical animal doesn't .
cant say anthing bout real friends but even saint blackop2cel have friends
 

Similar threads

K
Replies
20
Views
499
TooSomething
TooSomething
BloodDrained
Replies
35
Views
2K
blackpillmage
blackpillmage
Stupid Clown
Replies
16
Views
1K
TheLastRhodesian
TheLastRhodesian
pedrolopezwasright
Replies
12
Views
410
pedrolopezwasright
pedrolopezwasright

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top