I don’t totally agree with OP on everything, but there is one thing he’s totally spot on about, and it is that returning to a patriarchy is totally irrational and impossible. Those who believe a new world order is coming with an established patriarchy are beyond deluded. I honestly find it quite funny when I see guys on here who think that because their looks match would be forced to be with them, then it would mean they would want to.
@Zyros misunderstood what OP was saying imo. He never implied that the natural order was appealing, he just acknowledged its existence, which is undeniable. It’s clear that our reproductive tendencies are no different from that of the great apes; men of (of all levels of attractiveness) will fuck most women (of most levels of attractiveness) because we are essentially mindless beasts enslaved to our sexual hormones. Women (of all levels of attractiveness) are attracted to a few alphas, can settle for the occasional beta, and are fundamentally incapable of feeling attraction towards omegas.
When I say incapabale that is what I mean. No system where they are forced to pair up with an incel-tier man due to societal pressure is going to produce satisfying results for either of party.
This is why I never understand the apportion of blame when discussing society-wide gender ills. No one is to blame for their nature, they are only capable of action within their biological programming to the extent the society they live in permits it. If you start imposing rules over people that restrict their endogenous reproductive tendencies then you are going to have an unhappy and sexually repressed population, unless you are deluding them with the promise of metaphysical reward for their commitment in a transparently fictional afterlife - which is surely impossible in the age of information technology.