R
People here often suggest that better looking people truly are "better people." They say that good looks give an easier life and positive reinforcement, and that then makes you treat others better as well. But this is not remotely true. In fact, the better looking you are, the more you will get what you want, and thus the more selfish and entitled you will become. Because of the halo effect, you will not suffer from this in any way. People will still treat you like you are a good person. And they will believe you are due to the halo effect which overrides everything. But you will not be "better" by the traditional measures. You will be absolutely "worse".
The more of anything a person has, the more selfish they become. For example, rich people donate less to charity than poor people: https://thegiveandget.com/2018/05/22/how-the-rich-justify-donating-less-to-charity-than-the-poor/
The same is absolutely true of being good looking. Good looking men are proven as being more selfish: https://www.independent.co.uk/life-...n-are-more-likely-to-be-selfish-10042039.html
One of the strongest drivers of generosity and kindness is the desire for approval of others. When you are ugly, you will always feel insecure, even subconsciously, and you will constantly be seeking approval. You will bend over backwards to make others happy, because you will crave their acceptance.
On the other hand, when you already have everything you want in life, you will have no reason to care what people think about you. You won't want or need the approval of others. When you are liberated in this way, you will act more selfishly, putting your own interests first.
In truth, neither of these things are objectively "better" or "worse". Both just represent people seeking that which is important to them. To the ugly person, validation and approval is most important, so they seek that. To the good looking person, what others think is less important, so they chase their own goals. Both are technically acting to suit their own purposes.
But society (ie. cucks) tell us that generous people are virtuous and selfish ones are bad. In other words, society says the better looking you are, the "worse" of a person you are. Of course this is in direct contradiction to how people are treated. Attractive people are treated well no matter what and ugly people are treated poorly. Selfishness is only punished when a person is ugly, because then they are offering society nothing - neither good looks nor supplication/subservience.
Selfishness is actually a quite useful trait, and in fact, good looking people are more evolved in being able to express it. Truly alpha guys like Trump (6'+ white born into millions) are selfish as fuck. Acting this way can take you to the highest office in the world or earn you billions. Guys like that don't care about what other people think about them. They don't care who they ruin to get what they want. They are truly free.
We all adapt to our circumstances and what we're born into. If you're born short and small, you will likely learn to be a pacifist and defuse tension with humor/jokes. If you're born tall and strong, you'll likely learn to defuse tension with an implied or explicit physical threat.
Looks dictate your personality and what type of person you are, but not on a genetic level. It's just society and the reaction of others conditioning you into the person you become. It's almost a joke how much this affects us and most of us don't even realize it. The only way to become aware of how malleable and adaptive your personality is is to change your appearance significantly. No matter where you are on the looks scale, if your appearance changes by 2+ points in either direction, you will become a completely different person. I guarantee it.
The more of anything a person has, the more selfish they become. For example, rich people donate less to charity than poor people: https://thegiveandget.com/2018/05/22/how-the-rich-justify-donating-less-to-charity-than-the-poor/
The same is absolutely true of being good looking. Good looking men are proven as being more selfish: https://www.independent.co.uk/life-...n-are-more-likely-to-be-selfish-10042039.html
One of the strongest drivers of generosity and kindness is the desire for approval of others. When you are ugly, you will always feel insecure, even subconsciously, and you will constantly be seeking approval. You will bend over backwards to make others happy, because you will crave their acceptance.
On the other hand, when you already have everything you want in life, you will have no reason to care what people think about you. You won't want or need the approval of others. When you are liberated in this way, you will act more selfishly, putting your own interests first.
In truth, neither of these things are objectively "better" or "worse". Both just represent people seeking that which is important to them. To the ugly person, validation and approval is most important, so they seek that. To the good looking person, what others think is less important, so they chase their own goals. Both are technically acting to suit their own purposes.
But society (ie. cucks) tell us that generous people are virtuous and selfish ones are bad. In other words, society says the better looking you are, the "worse" of a person you are. Of course this is in direct contradiction to how people are treated. Attractive people are treated well no matter what and ugly people are treated poorly. Selfishness is only punished when a person is ugly, because then they are offering society nothing - neither good looks nor supplication/subservience.
Selfishness is actually a quite useful trait, and in fact, good looking people are more evolved in being able to express it. Truly alpha guys like Trump (6'+ white born into millions) are selfish as fuck. Acting this way can take you to the highest office in the world or earn you billions. Guys like that don't care about what other people think about them. They don't care who they ruin to get what they want. They are truly free.
We all adapt to our circumstances and what we're born into. If you're born short and small, you will likely learn to be a pacifist and defuse tension with humor/jokes. If you're born tall and strong, you'll likely learn to defuse tension with an implied or explicit physical threat.
Looks dictate your personality and what type of person you are, but not on a genetic level. It's just society and the reaction of others conditioning you into the person you become. It's almost a joke how much this affects us and most of us don't even realize it. The only way to become aware of how malleable and adaptive your personality is is to change your appearance significantly. No matter where you are on the looks scale, if your appearance changes by 2+ points in either direction, you will become a completely different person. I guarantee it.
