Serious being a provider and betabux is based

[fuckinggarbage]

In the past men were valued by how much they were able to provide and looks came after that. Successful hunters or strong men who had a fertile land were able to provide shelter, food and security and they had one or more wives just for that. From the beginning of time to 100 years ago men were valued only based on what they were able to provide, emperor's, monarchy, landlords, etc. It's in our genes to provide the same way it's in women genes to choose the best men.
So betas and simps are just following their instincts. So what changed? Well, thanks to tech and industrialization the role of the provider isn't needed anymore. Only in places like Africa it's still something.
So now only looks matter (and personality), that's why it's normal how things work, we shouldn't feel bad for this because our time comes next, we still need a companion, a partner and we will have it once any of this happens:
A: genetic edition becomes advanced enough to completely remodel our body or prevent subhumans to be born.
B: sex bots become advanced enough to be indistinguishable enough.
C: fully immersive virtual reality becomes a thing and we just live online like a Chad
Still our times are better, in the past most men lived miserable lives and the population was a lot smaller, now most men can access to sex and that's why the population grew so much.
And it's only going to become better in the future

 

[Idotms]

 

[Deleted member 9758]

 

[trying to ascend]

No, it's not in women genes to choose the best men. Stop praising them for something they aren't responsible for

 

[fuckinggarbage]

Weren't you going to ascend? Moeggels

 

[Idotms]

No, it's not in women genes to choose the best men. Stop praising them for something they aren't responsible for

 

[fuckinggarbage]

No, it's not in women genes to choose the best men. Stop praising them for something they aren't responsible for

IIt's the principle of evolution, survival of the fittest. All the animals do that

 

[trying to ascend]

IIt's the principle of evolution, survival of the fittest. All the animals do that

Those characteristcs (muscles, wide jawline and etc) were selected based on an environment that doesn't reflect our current one, hence why being sexually desired by foids doesn't imply being more useful to society (if that's what you mean by the best).

If I'm not mistaken, there is even a species of deers who almost (or even went) went extinct because of how females would always choose the males with the biggest horns, which made almost impossible for them to keep their heads up.

Found: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:667303/FULLTEXT01.pdf

 

[Emperor]

In the past men were valued by how much they were able to provide and looks came after that. Successful hunters or strong men who had a fertile land were able to provide shelter, food and security and they had one or more wives just for that. From the beginning of time to 100 years ago men were valued only based on what they were able to provide, emperor's, monarchy, landlords, etc. It's in our genes to provide the same way it's in women genes to choose the best men.
So betas and simps are just following their instincts. So what changed? Well, thanks to tech and industrialization the role of the provider isn't needed anymore. Only in places like Africa it's still something.
So now only looks matter (and personality), that's why it's normal how things work, we shouldn't feel bad for this because our time comes next, we still need a companion, a partner and we will have it once any of this happens:
A: genetic edition becomes advanced enough to completely remodel our body or prevent subhumans to be born.
B: sex bots become advanced enough to be indistinguishable enough.
C: fully immersive virtual reality becomes a thing and we just live online like a Chad
Still our times are better, in the past most men lived miserable lives and the population was a lot smaller, now most men can access to sex and that's why the population grew so much.
And it's only going to become better in the future

Those characteristcs (muscles, wide jawline and etc) were selected based on an environment that doesn't reflect our current one, hence why being sexually desired by foids doesn't imply being more useful to society (if that's what you mean by the best).

If I'm not mistaken, there is even a species of deers who almost (or even went) went extinct because of how females would always choose the males with the biggest horns, which made almost impossible for them to keep their heads up.

Found: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:667303/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Being useful to society means nothing when it comes to good genes. I don't want to contribute to society or provide for a woman like a beta cuck, I just want to fuck lots of bitches like any man with healthy T levels should.

 

[BrazilianLambda]

Well, let's unpack this doggo. Shall we?

In the past men were valued by how much they were able to provide and looks came after that. Successful hunters or strong men who had a fertile land were able to provide shelter, food and security and they had one or more wives just for that.

"Successful hunters and strong men" are chads, not short, skinny, weaklings like us.

From the beginning of time to 100 years ago men were valued only based on what they were able to provide, emperor's, monarchy, landlords, etc. It's in our genes to provide the same way it's in women genes to choose the best men.

No, there is no such thing. It's in our genes to fuck, not to provide. Providing is a side effect of fucking (e.g. raising kids, etc).

So betas and simps are just following their instincts. So what changed? Well, thanks to tech and industrialization the role of the provider isn't needed anymore. Only in places like Africa it's still something.

Thanks to tech and industrialization, women are financially independent and don't really need men to provide for them, meaning they get to be more picky on who to fuck. Chads only, of course.

So now only looks matter (and personality), that's why it's normal how things work, we shouldn't feel bad for this because our time comes next, we still need a companion, a partner and we will have it once any of this happens:
A: genetic edition becomes advanced enough to completely remodel our body or prevent subhumans to be born.
B: sex bots become advanced enough to be indistinguishable enough.

Not going to happen in our lifetime. Also, we are already born, can't change our genes.

C: fully immersive virtual reality becomes a thing and we just live online like a Chad

Sure, anyone can be a chad online. For example, I am a 6'3 muscled gigachad. Believe me!

Still our times are better, in the past most men lived miserable lives and the population was a lot smaller, now most men can access to sex and that's why the population grew so much.

Population grew because of modern medicine and better living conditions, not because we have more sex, you fucking idiot.

And it's only going to become better in the future

Cope.

 

[fuckinggarbage]

Those characteristcs (muscles, wide jawline and etc) were selected based on an environment that doesn't reflect our current one, hence why being sexually desired by foids doesn't imply being more useful to society (if that's what you mean by the best).

If I'm not mistaken, there is even a species of deers who almost (or even went) went extinct because of how females would always choose the males with the biggest horns, which made almost impossible for them to keep their heads up.

Found: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:667303/FULLTEXT01.pdf

First of all what's better for society isn't what's better for our specie, our animal instincts choose the stronger, taller, the one with the best genes based on all the evolutionary history of humans and even monkeys.
Second, our actual society is too complex and changing, what's better for it won't be incorporated in our instincts

 

[fuckinggarbage]

Well, let's unpack this doggo. Shall we?



"Successful hunters and strong men" are chads, not short, skinny, weaklings like us.



No, there is no such thing. It's in our genes to fuck, not to provide. Providing is a side effect of fucking (e.g. raising kids, etc).



Thanks to tech and industrialization, women are financially independent and don't really need men to provide for them, meaning they get to be more picky on who to fuck. Chads only, of course.



Not going to happen in our lifetime. Also, we are already born, can't change our genes.



Sure, anyone can be a chad online. For example, I am a 6'3 muscled gigachad. Believe me!



Population grew because of modern medicine and better living conditions, not because we have more sex, you fucking idiot.




Cope.

You didn't get the point, also I was talking about providers and betabuxrs not incels

 

[fuckinggarbage]

Being useful to society means nothing when it comes to good genes. I don't want to contribute to society or provide for a woman like a beta cuck, I just want to fuck lots of bitches like any man with healthy T levels should.

Offcourse me too but in the past we had to provide to do that we wanted or not

 

[trying to ascend]

First of all what's better for society isn't what's better for our specie, our animal instincts choose the stronger, taller, the one with the best genes based on all the evolutionary history of humans and even monkeys.
Second, our actual society is too complex and changing, what's better for it won't be incorporated in our instincts

I never claimed to be, that's why I supposed you were meaning that. But supposing you are talking biologically about us, how them choosing strong and tall men is better for us? Aren't smart and actually healthy men more useful? Do you think their sexual attraction predicts it better than our judgement?

Yes, that's why women's sexual selection isn't accurate when it comes to it, thus there is no reason to praise them

 

[BrazilianLambda]

You didn't get the point, also I was talking about providers and betabuxrs not incels

I got your point. Yes, men don't need to be hardcore cavemen gigachads anymore to be able to provide. However, the last couple of hundreds of years of industrialization are not going to change millions of years of evolutionary biology.

 

[Deleted member 41061]

I got your point. Yes, men don't need to be hardcore cavemen gigachads anymore to be able to provide. However, the last couple of hundreds of years of industrialization are not going to change millions of years of evolutionary biology.

You could kill Chad with a spear back in the days being ugly and short. Muh genes. Stop believing in that fallacy. Snakes are smaller and weaker than humans (most of them) yet some of them have very toxic venom and can kill stronger animals. Just be Chad right? You stupid.

Humans are much weaker than other animals yet we conquered the world. Something doesn't work in your blackpill genes bullshit

 

[mistersinister]

Funny thing is I can't even do that despite my parents and degree

 

[Deleted member 41074]

You could kill Chad with a spear back in the days being ugly and short. Muh genes. Stop believing in that fallacy. Snakes are smaller and weaker than humans (most of them) yet some of them have very toxic venom and can kill stronger animals. Just be Chad right? You stupid.

Humans are much weaker than other animals yet we conquered the world. Something doesn't work in your blackpill genes bullshit

Bacteria can kill a human being.
Parasites, viruses, mosquitos, flies...
Radiation, which is invisible DNA-scrambling asshole.
Swallowing a piece of beef the wrong way can make you choke and die like a bitch.
Humans are weak as fuck without technologies to repair us (medecine) or to protect us. And we also love to make weapons to make killing easier, cheaper and more convenient.
We are both superior and inferior to animals.
And yes Chad isn't fireproof, I would just burn the gigachad while he is sleeping in caveman days and he would burn like a roasted chicken
Women still get wet for bigger men because they never went past the state where we became bipedal and started creating tools. They also like being reminded of how it felt when they were lolis and daddy was bigger
They essentially love to get raped by a man twice their sizes. If not, then there wouldn't be 5 foot nothing goblinas with 7 foot aryan chads. It's clear as fuck.