Deleted member 5861
Blackpill Scientist
-
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2018
- Posts
- 6,810
10/10 ban appealHe’s active to this day, he’s constantly viewing threads, although he isn’t allowed to participate
10/10 ban appealHe’s active to this day, he’s constantly viewing threads, although he isn’t allowed to participate
I call racebaitingJust curious what happened to @EARTH ? Can't PM him to ask.
I call racebaiting
I used to report some of his blatant racebait posts/threads and they would stay up, so I doubt it was that.
Just curious what happened to @EARTH ? Can't PM him to ask.
The mistery continues
I talked to Kylo recently. I think he's just taking a break
if you’re referring to one of your own, you can do it by replying to the warning PM the mod sends out@knajjd is this the place to discuss warnings?
High T idea.Bring back @Tellem-T
if you’re referring to one of your own, you can do it by replying to the warning PM the mod sends out
From my personal perspective, if you didn't have the option to reply, it means that the person who issued the warning decided that there is no recourse for what you have posted/said/done and therefore is not interested in hearing what your counterarguments may be. I imagine this is because it was a direct violation of the rules with no plausible exculpatory evidence.I didn't have an option to reply? I'll start a new conversation
From my personal perspective, if you didn't have the option to reply, it means that the person who issued the warning decided that there is no recourse for what you have posted/said/done and therefore is not interested in hearing what your counterarguments may be. I imagine this is because it was a direct violation of the rules with no plausible exculpatory evidence.
Lol?Mod had to hit his quota I guess.
Wait what the cuck happened to the chat?
He requested his banBring back @Tellem-T
Don't kill chat, bring it back, please. I promise that i will post more often, tbhtbh nglWait what the cuck happened to the chat?
I will kill myself if they don't bring the chat back tbh.
eh I didn't really care for the chat tbhI will kill myself if they don't bring the chat back tbh.
We are having technical issues and we have removed chat to see if it will help site stability.Don't kill chat, bring it back, please. I promise that i will post more often, tbhtbh ngl
Depending on the context of the misinformation, the mods and admins retain the right to action posts as they see appropriate even if it is not explicitly covered by the rules. In the past, there was a note in the rules saying that all issues that fall outside of the core rules are decided on a case-by-case basis by the mods. This note was removed because it is implied that we run this site and therefore we make decisions that may fall outside of the simplistic core rules, because it's nonsensical to write out a rule for every possible infraction that can be committed on an online forum. The rules only cover the basics and most frequent and direct violations.Where in the rules does it say that "misinformation" is not allowed?
Depending on the context of the misinformation, the mods and admins retain the right to action posts as they see appropriate even if it is not explicitly covered by the rules. In the past, there was a note in the rules saying that all issues that fall outside of the core rules are decided on a case-by-case basis by the mods. This note was removed because it is implied that we run this site and therefore we make decisions that may fall outside of the simplistic core rules, because it's nonsensical to write out a rule for every possible infraction that can be committed on an online forum. The rules only cover the basics and most frequent and direct violations.
Sorry if I wasn't clear, I meant that the note directly said that issues that fall outside of the rules are handled according to the mod's discretion. I only realized that it was removed a month or two ago and asked Serge about it directly, to which he said that it is an implied fact of how a forum works.Wait are you saying that the note itself implied you run the site? Or that you being mod implies you run the site?
Sorry if I wasn't clear, I meant that the note directly said that issues that fall outside of the rules are handled according to the mod's discretion. I only realized that it was removed a month or two ago and asked Serge about it directly, to which he said that it is an implied fact of how a forum works.
Would you not agree that "too much" in itself is open to interpretation and is highly subjective? Do you think that we need to have a longwinded list of every possible offense that can happen on a web forum and the repercussions of any such behavior listed? How do you account for every type of trolling possible on an incel website without writing a book?Would you not agree that that leaves too much open to interpretation? Or that it has potential for abuse? For example, a mod using the "mod discretion" excuse for personal goals when they wouldn't have otherwise? Or one post being warned when another mod would have overlooked that same post? What's the extent of "mod discretion"? Inconsistent moderation like that will lead to unhappy users.
I had a long paragraph about @Improvecel 's ban(?) from his thread but it got deleted but basically I'm a bit confused why his thread got deleted, it wasn't really controversial in any sense and a lot of users do exaggerate about things like 80/20 or they'll say things like "Only 10% of men get laid" or some drivel like that. I think things like that hurt blackpill discussion more than direct confrontations to them like ImproveCel's thread. I think we certainly could have came to a consensus with the OP and met him halfway. That's all. Thanks for reading.
Why not just kill yourself?
Not in the typical "lul rope" on this forum, but in a 100% serious sense. If all you do is for women and your entire existence revolves around women; whom you will probably never get, why not kill yourself?
Here's a good example of why:
Yeah, very obviously a troll trying to start shit. Perm'd him, no regrets.
I am going to guess that you wrote this post before receiving my PM.Thanks for the info, didn't know that. Btw, I created a thread earlier in this forum and it got deleted and they told me to post in the ban megathread discussion. Check this out:
View attachment 29528
So if I can't ask here or the Meta forum I'm not really sure where to ask since I got pointed in different direcitons.
I'll go as far as to tell you that we have some of the best moderation you'll find out there. How many places do you know that have warnings before an outright ban? How many places have a ban appeal process? How many have a full feedback forum?
Perhaps all have one of these, but hardly any have all.
all I did was post a thread advocating suicide by fire?
Why exactly did this happen when all I did was post a thread advocating suicide by fire?
Comedy that writes itself, for free.
Why exactly did this happen when all I did was post a thread advocating suicide by fire?
This is truly the best place to be in.Comedy that writes itself, for free.
View attachment 29911
Lmfao fastest ban in history?
View attachment 29911
Lmfao fastest ban in history?
Holy shit what did he even do?
Holy shit what did he even do?
Probably an alt of a banned account
View attachment 29911
Lmfao fastest ban in history?
Probably an alt of a banned account