![Dregster](https://data.incels.is/avatars/m/13/13198.jpg?1672455742)
Dregster
VillagerSlayerMaxxing
★★★★★
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2018
- Posts
- 36,222
Who says that shit manI can't believe @AllanKing would say some gay shit like that
No wonder he got banned again
"ugly bottom"
"Decent fag" there's no such thing
Who says that shit manI can't believe @AllanKing would say some gay shit like that
No wonder he got banned again
Free @fulltimerloser
he has humorous arguments with other forum users.![]()
free him@AutisticMonstrosity
@MartinLutherCoon
free @Broly
also free all the future banned niggas who get banned by the new jannies who will get drunk on power.
free him
Uncage @FullTimeLoser![]()
free FTL he is entertaining lol.Free @FullTimeLoser since when are we not allowed to hate on other races?
@MartinLutherCoon banned a few days after getting unbanned. Interesting.
Think he had a thread called "going ER is good" or somethingWhy was @Italian Incel banned?
That's alot to read@SergeantIncel , brother, I honestly love this site. Compared to the rest of the internet, this place is a paradise, a lot of the stuff we're allowed to say here is heavily censored on other platforms, and I think I speak for the majority of us when I say we do appreciate this forum for it gives us the valuable opportunity to voice our honest opinions in ways we can't anywhere else (I mean, there are other sites too like 4chan for example but they're full of trolls and fags and you can't make friendships there XD)
So yeah, this forum is the shit ngl but I have to say I disagree with one particular rule, the "anti-racism" rule.
Now I do understand that the rule is not enforced fullsoy mode, and that when it is applied, it usually has to do with users being harassed or someone stirring up discord among the userbase so as to generate drama. But I don't see the point behind having an anti-racism rule if the main purpose is to avoid stuff like harassment.
Isn't it better to just have an anti-harassment rule against repeated (unwarranted) personal attacks rather than censoring racist views?I mean, I'm barely racist myself, I kick it pretty much with all races but a lot of the other brocels do hold racist opinions, and I think it's worth letting them express themselves freely (as long as they don't post illegal stuff, of course) This is why I've never reported anyone for race baiting, even if it bothers me, I think everyone should be allowed to be honest.
So what say you my fren? let's free my Jewish homeboy @FullTimeLoser and tweak the rules a bit eh?
@BummerDrummer @gymletethnicel @incelerated @ThoughtfulCel @Diocel @Uggo Mongo @Dregster666 @Irredeemable @Babica Yaga @IsolationHurts @Mainländer @proudweeb @FamilyGuy1999 @MarquisDeSade
I'm just saying that race bating shouldn't be bannable. Do you agree?That's alot to read![]()
I'm just saying that race bating shouldn't be bannable. Do you agree?![]()
race bating shouldn't be bannable
IMO only persecution/bullying of users should be against the rules. Being racist in general, no.@SergeantIncel , brother, I honestly love this site. Compared to the rest of the internet, this place is a paradise, a lot of the stuff we're allowed to say here is heavily censored on other platforms, and I think I speak for the majority of us when I say we do appreciate this forum for it gives us the valuable opportunity to voice our honest opinions in ways we can't anywhere else (I mean, there are other sites too like 4chan for example but they're full of trolls and fags and you can't make friendships there XD)
So yeah, this forum is the shit ngl but I have to say I disagree with one particular rule, the "anti-racism" rule.
Now I do understand that the rule is not enforced fullsoy mode, and that when it is applied, it usually has to do with users being harassed or someone stirring up discord among the userbase so as to generate drama. But I don't see the point behind having an anti-racism rule if the main purpose is to avoid stuff like harassment.
Isn't it better to just have an anti-harassment rule against repeated (unwarranted) personal attacks rather than censoring racist views?I mean, I'm barely racist myself, I kick it pretty much with all races but a lot of the other brocels do hold racist opinions, and I think it's worth letting them express themselves freely (as long as they don't post illegal stuff, of course) This is why I've never reported anyone for race baiting, even if it bothers me, I think everyone should be allowed to be honest.
So what say you my fren? let's free my Jewish homeboy @FullTimeLoser and tweak the rules a bit eh?
@BummerDrummer @gymletethnicel @incelerated @ThoughtfulCel @Diocel @Uggo Mongo @Dregster666 @Irredeemable @Babica Yaga @IsolationHurts @Mainländer @proudweeb @FamilyGuy1999 @MarquisDeSade
Isn't it better to just have an anti-harassment rule against repeated (unwarranted) personal attacks
Yeah that's what I'm saying. And also about bullying and persecution: only if it is unwarranted (meaning, the person reporting the abuse didn't bring it upon himself)IMO only persecution/bullying of users should be against the rules. Being racist in general, no.
Wrong. Pretty much all the people I've attacked, they started it firstLike those you do?![]()
@SergeantIncel , brother, I honestly love this site. Compared to the rest of the internet, this place is a paradise, a lot of the stuff we're allowed to say here is heavily censored on other platforms, and I think I speak for the majority of us when I say we do appreciate this forum for it gives us the valuable opportunity to voice our honest opinions in ways we can't anywhere else (I mean, there are other sites too like 4chan for example but they're full of trolls and fags and you can't make friendships there XD)
So yeah, this forum is the shit ngl but I have to say I disagree with one particular rule, the "anti-racism" rule.
Now I do understand that the rule is not enforced fullsoy mode, and that when it is applied, it usually has to do with users being harassed or someone stirring up discord among the userbase so as to generate drama. But I don't see the point behind having an anti-racism rule if the main purpose is to avoid stuff like harassment.
Isn't it better to just have an anti-harassment rule against repeated (unwarranted) personal attacks rather than censoring racist views?I mean, I'm barely racist myself, I kick it pretty much with all races but a lot of the other brocels do hold racist opinions, and I think it's worth letting them express themselves freely (as long as they don't post illegal stuff, of course) This is why I've never reported anyone for race baiting, even if it bothers me, I think everyone should be allowed to be honest.
So what say you my fren? let's free my Jewish homeboy @FullTimeLoser and tweak the rules a bit eh?
@BummerDrummer @gymletethnicel @incelerated @ThoughtfulCel @Diocel @Uggo Mongo @Dregster666 @Irredeemable @Babica Yaga @IsolationHurts @Mainländer @proudweeb @FamilyGuy1999 @MarquisDeSade
Banned for racism? This place is no different reddit.@SergeantIncel , brother, I honestly love this site. Compared to the rest of the internet, this place is a paradise, a lot of the stuff we're allowed to say here is heavily censored on other platforms, and I think I speak for the majority of us when I say we do appreciate this forum for it gives us the valuable opportunity to voice our honest opinions in ways we can't anywhere else (I mean, there are other sites too like 4chan for example but they're full of trolls and fags and you can't make friendships there XD)
So yeah, this forum is the shit ngl but I have to say I disagree with one particular rule, the "anti-racism" rule.
Now I do understand that the rule is not enforced fullsoy mode, and that when it is applied, it usually has to do with users being harassed or someone stirring up discord among the userbase so as to generate drama. But I don't see the point behind having an anti-racism rule if the main purpose is to avoid stuff like harassment.
Isn't it better to just have an anti-harassment rule against repeated (unwarranted) personal attacks rather than censoring racist views?I mean, I'm barely racist myself, I kick it pretty much with all races but a lot of the other brocels do hold racist opinions, and I think it's worth letting them express themselves freely (as long as they don't post illegal stuff, of course) This is why I've never reported anyone for race baiting, even if it bothers me, I think everyone should be allowed to be honest.
So what say you my fren? let's free my Jewish homeboy @FullTimeLoser and tweak the rules a bit eh?
@BummerDrummer @gymletethnicel @incelerated @ThoughtfulCel @Diocel @Uggo Mongo @Dregster666 @Irredeemable @Babica Yaga @IsolationHurts @Mainländer @proudweeb @FamilyGuy1999 @MarquisDeSade
Perma for racebaitBanned for racism? This place is no different reddit.
Free @FullTimeLoser
Banned for racism? This place is no different reddit.
Free @FullTimeLoser
Nanananah if we're gonna get rid of the anti racism rule then it has to be fair for everyone. You can't say it's bullshit and then call for the ban of bummer dude, that makes you a hypocrite.Fucking hypocritical bullshit. If anyone should be banned for racism and race baiting it's @BummerDrummer. I don't think you should be banned for racism, should be acceptable. But it's hypocritical to let one user be racist without punishment and perma ban another.
@SergeantIncel
That's not the right attitude bro. We're trying to get rid of the rule cuz it doesn't make sense. Why would you even mention bummer and say he should be banned? That's counter productive man nam sayinYou don't understand me, I'm saying that if he's going to start banning people for racism then that's the first person who should be banned.
I'll let @BummerDrummer respond to the stuff you're saying about him, but imo his support is valuable given that he's a renowned user liked by many white incels so I don't think this is the time to be throwing accusations like that man. This anti racism rule affects all of us negatively, so we should all agree on that for now until the problem is solved and leave the race war thing for later eh?He won't get banned anyway, he's a protected user free of rules.
You don't think it's hypocritical to ban someone for racism while the most notorious racist of the forum never got banned?
I mention him because it shows that favourites are being played, since he's a proud racist who hates ethnics. He's free to be racist, that's his cope. Just don't forget [UWSL]all the hate for blacks and Jews on this forum, which is not just common, it's a standard here.[/UWSL]
People should be allowed to talk shit about whites just as much as ethnics, Jews and blacks. The reason why @FullTimeLoser got banned is because those same whites who constantly talk shit about every other race screech when someone talks shit about whites.
has anyone been banned for racism? I always bash mayos niggers curries and even my own race but I never got a warning@SergeantIncel , brother, I honestly love this site. Compared to the rest of the internet, this place is a paradise, a lot of the stuff we're allowed to say here is heavily censored on other platforms, and I think I speak for the majority of us when I say we do appreciate this forum for it gives us the valuable opportunity to voice our honest opinions in ways we can't anywhere else (I mean, there are other sites too like 4chan for example but they're full of trolls and fags and you can't make friendships there XD)
So yeah, this forum is the shit ngl but I have to say I disagree with one particular rule, the "anti-racism" rule.
Now I do understand that the rule is not enforced fullsoy mode, and that when it is applied, it usually has to do with users being harassed or someone stirring up discord among the userbase so as to generate drama. But I don't see the point behind having an anti-racism rule if the main purpose is to avoid stuff like harassment.
Isn't it better to just have an anti-harassment rule against repeated (unwarranted) personal attacks rather than censoring racist views?I mean, I'm barely racist myself, I kick it pretty much with all races but a lot of the other brocels do hold racist opinions, and I think it's worth letting them express themselves freely (as long as they don't post illegal stuff, of course) This is why I've never reported anyone for race baiting, even if it bothers me, I think everyone should be allowed to be honest.
So what say you my fren? let's free my Jewish homeboy @FullTimeLoser and tweak the rules a bit eh?
@BummerDrummer @gymletethnicel @incelerated @ThoughtfulCel @Diocel @Uggo Mongo @Dregster666 @Irredeemable @Babica Yaga @IsolationHurts @Mainländer @proudweeb @FamilyGuy1999 @MarquisDeSade
Yeah. Free @FullTimeLoser@SergeantIncel , brother, I honestly love this site. Compared to the rest of the internet, this place is a paradise, a lot of the stuff we're allowed to say here is heavily censored on other platforms, and I think I speak for the majority of us when I say we do appreciate this forum for it gives us the valuable opportunity to voice our honest opinions in ways we can't anywhere else (I mean, there are other sites too like 4chan for example but they're full of trolls and fags and you can't make friendships there XD)
So yeah, this forum is the shit ngl but I have to say I disagree with one particular rule, the "anti-racism" rule.
Now I do understand that the rule is not enforced fullsoy mode, and that when it is applied, it usually has to do with users being harassed or someone stirring up discord among the userbase so as to generate drama. But I don't see the point behind having an anti-racism rule if the main purpose is to avoid stuff like harassment.
Isn't it better to just have an anti-harassment rule against repeated (unwarranted) personal attacks rather than censoring racist views?I mean, I'm barely racist myself, I kick it pretty much with all races but a lot of the other brocels do hold racist opinions, and I think it's worth letting them express themselves freely (as long as they don't post illegal stuff, of course) This is why I've never reported anyone for race baiting, even if it bothers me, I think everyone should be allowed to be honest.
So what say you my fren? let's free my Jewish homeboy @FullTimeLoser and tweak the rules a bit eh?
@BummerDrummer @gymletethnicel @incelerated @ThoughtfulCel @Diocel @Uggo Mongo @Dregster666 @Irredeemable @Babica Yaga @IsolationHurts @Mainländer @proudweeb @FamilyGuy1999 @MarquisDeSade
Well you joined before than me and have very few posts, I never see you around so I suppose you never got a warning due to not being active brohas anyone been banned for racism? I always bash mayos niggers curries and even my own race but I never got a warning![]()
that might be the case but I lurked around here before creating the account, I usually see people getting banned for being fakecels or obvious baitingWell you joined before than me and have very few posts, I never see you around so I suppose you never got a warning due to not being active bro
Yeah a lot of fakecels have been banned so that's a good thing (moderation staff doing their job). But the "baiting" thing isn't so bad imo and it shouldn't be punishable by Permathat might be the case but I lurked around here before creating the account, I usually see people getting banned for being fakecels or obvious baiting
So you do agree that the rule is bad for all of us?See my post #29,681
My point is there isn't a hypocritical application of the rules, and gave an example which was yourself.
My point is there are plenty of users that are waycist to whites, call and invent slurs for them etc. There is no double standard at play here. See my post #29,681.
I was under the understanding that @FullTimeLoser was Perma banned so my bad. As for the bating thing, I disagree with a couple of things but it seems pretty fair tbh and also, it's your forum so I am not in a position to demand for rule changes. Thanks for taking the time to read that wall of text man, I thought you were gonna ignore me NGL haha sorry for this misunderstandingHe's at 80%, not permabanned, and I would never unban a user because he's popular or has friends here, cronyism is a terrible moderation practice. 80% is 3 days total of ban.
There is no anti-racism rule. If you mean the racebait rule then that has been here since the site was made, and I copied it straight from /r/incels.
There's a difference between being racist - which you can be if you want because that enters into the realm of your personal belief system and free speech - and attacking users or racebaiting.
If you attack a user and use racism to do it, AND the user reports you (otherwise we typically assume the user doesn't mind and don't consider it bullying/harassment) then we're probably warning you. But the warning is for the attack, not for the language.
If you racebait - if you say stuff like, I don't know, "whites/blacks/X are fakecels and should gtfo of this forum and kill themselves" then that's racebaiting. It is beyond a mere belief - it is an attack on the whole % of the forum that is of that ethnicity, and it is indeed bait of the bad kind, because you can expect plenty of insults and in that thread where the mentioned party is indirectly being attacked.
Remember this forum is very ethnically diverse, more than the US in therms of percentage. In short, one can be racist and respectful at the same time.
free @Broly
free @Broly
This nigher actually went "you hate gays so much you must be secretly gay" on meIs @AllanKing temporarily or permanently banned?