Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL Average sandnigger activity

this thread: Allahuakbar's me
 
you have to pick one side. these statements as a shiite then are admittedly clearing sunni population of terrorism and make you come out as contradictive without any sight on these matters.
you have to give 1 definite answer, Was it Americans who planned terrorism in the region or Sunnis?
it's planned, they do not want solid states in the region, so they keep destabilizing them with terrorism. anyway muslims like it somehow, but behind any terrorist group there is a foreign country that is gaining from it, not only there
 
it's planned, they do not want solid states in the region, so they keep destabilizing them with terrorism. anyway muslims like it somehow, but behind any terrorist group there is a foreign country that is gaining from it, not only there
then you know it was similar to the Iraq-Iran war. Mutts basically pushed these two major forces in the mid east to fight against eachother in a losing war.
Mutts supported saddam then made a 180° turn with Irangate. they just wanted each part to weaken the other. the difference is supreme council wasn't buying that bit and quickly focused on reforming after the war, while saddam went apeshit because he felt everyone betrayed him.
 
prime example of saddam's lowiq:

after the 1988 ceasefire, both countries suffered financial losses and usurping military forces which put further costs, saddam's suggested solution to nazar al khazraji, Iraqi minister of defence and councilor was to have a war and invade some country in the region to get rid of those extra military costs (dedsrs)

so he raised the tension with gulf countries, starting with saudi arabia, then he found a good reason to invade kuwait just two years after getting out from deadly war with Iran. lol
 
prime example of saddam's lowiq:

after the 1988 ceasefire, both countries suffered financial losses and usurping military forces which put further costs, saddam's suggested solution to nazar al khazraji, Iraqi minister of defence and councilor was to have a war and invade some country in the region to get rid of those extra military costs (dedsrs)

so he raised the tension with gulf countries, starting with saudi arabia, then he found a good reason to invade kuwait just two years after getting out from deadly war with Iran. lol
ded srs what was going in bro's head when he did this?
bro couldn't wait more than two years to start another war. JFL
 
ded srs what was going in bro's head when he did this?
bro couldn't wait more than two years to start another war. JFL
bro was a truecel
 
Why is that?
Because they are more concerned with sunnis and to lesser extent israel, they don't target minorities unless they have money on them.

Shias are also poorer on average which makes them dumber and friendlier.
 
Because they are more concerned with sunnis and to lesser extent israel, they don't target minorities unless they have money on them.

Shias are also poorer on average which makes them dumber and friendlier.
Persians are shias right? Is that why they hate Arabs?
 
Persians are shias right? Is that why they hate Arabs?
They always did even before Islam, the whole shia vs sunni thing is just a reason to justify their hatrad otherwise Persians are not particularly religious
 
sand nagger camel rave
 
that poor camel looks stressed out
 

Similar threads

Shitskin=Shitlife
Replies
10
Views
878
nihilum
nihilum
Chud Norris72
Replies
23
Views
797
IWWorkER
IWWorkER
Clavicus Vile
Replies
9
Views
306
LeFrenchCel
LeFrenchCel
ANTAGONIST
Replies
21
Views
1K
ANTAGONIST
ANTAGONIST
nakolas
Replies
7
Views
677
nakolas
nakolas

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top