AASI= Australoid Nigger DNA
AASI= Australoid Nigger DNA
What % would you put yourself at? I am at 45-50% if I had to guess tbh.
Curries were blond blue-eyed Aryans before they miscegenated with subhuman abos 
the average punjabi looks more like 40-55%
true. I Cherry picked a bit but on average the trend remains true. Less about DNA= whiter and less shitskin
Kalash tribe is the future of other Aryans JFL. They're like a mere 100,000 peopleCurries were blond blue-eyed Aryans before they miscegenated with subhuman abos
why aren't curries rapemaxxing them
D
I envy them. If you’re not Abo in 2021… it’s just over bro.This is why I hate abos @Languishingrn
They live in isolared communties (white ethnostates JFL
). And besides, it should be the Kalash raping the Indians, not the other way around. They should fuck curry foids and bleach them, then make cuck indian men race the half-Aryan kids
Jfl reminds of this article. jbw is so powerful they are importing white sperm https://voiceonline.com/indian-couples-want-white-sperm-donors-for-fair-kids/They live in isolared communties (white ethnostates JFL
View attachment 510912
Who says they aren't. Consider the Kalash people, especially girls who are converted to islam or just picked off and married into muslim families. Their bloodline is then muddied by subhuman muslim dna.
JFL if I'm being honest, I wish I could go to india and have a harem of indian wives. I'd gladly help bleach them because I'm honestly attracted to dark-skinned caucasion women
Insane levels of cope, honestly.
All of your picks are cherry, but more importantly Dravidians with high hunter gatherer gene component almost always bone mog Aryans.
All of your picks are cherry, but more importantly Dravidians with high hunter gatherer gene component almost always bone mog Aryans.
Seething Shitskin indian
Iranians, Arabs, and Pakis are all whiter than than Indians. Any "Muslim DNA" which isn't even a real thing btw, that exists in Currites IMPROVED your genetics.
That's literally what Pakistanis are. Thus becoming muslim is a net negative for kalash. A kalash woman converting and marrying a muslims pakistani man is a woman wasting her good genes away on subhuman muslims.
Who says Kalash women married Paki men? lol Kalash are Muslim yet still have fair skin
That's a cuck right there, unlike ricecels who hordemaxxed and mass raped entire Eurasia, this crab is afraid of rapemaxxing even when he lives in a third world shithole and weeps about it on some pseudo intellectual BS forum full of coping wignats by the looks of it, the most successful bleaching in history happened in Turkey, Persia and in Central Asia where rice people actually became caucasian within some generations of occupying those lands albeit in Central Asia they killed off so many that they weren't able to weed off their mongoloid steppe looks completelySeething Shitskin indian
View attachment 510920
Kalash are not muslim tho
Last edited:
Whatev. Atleast none of them are arabs.
Yep, that's why a lot of Kazkahs, Tajiks, and so on look white-ish
Yeah, they are. Look it up wikipedia
Why does this matter exactly?
Cope, mongols had plenty of holes, they prolly got their share of cooming within some hours after that they slaughtered and destroyed the irrigation systems of those lands, they depopulated simply cos human nature is nasty like that, Afghanistan never recovered from the way Mongols destroyed its agriculture, cos Genghis personally led campaigns there against Khwarezm shah who's foolish enough to intercept mongol horde riding back to Mongolia under Subadai
Yep, that's why a lot of Kazkahs, Tajiks, and so on look white-ish
View attachment 510936
Yeah, they are. Look it up wikipedia
Why does this matter exactly?
Btw, it doesn't take long to become a muslim anyway, it's just they need to recite a sentence, their kids dick will suffer the consequences tho
But mongols didn't slaughter the royals, they'd roll them in a carpet and would stomp and run over them with their horses, Ilkhanate killed the Caliph and other royalties in that manner and the Golden horde which has converted to Islam by then declared war on them for that. Idk, human nature is like that, probably the war and the passion of battle slaughter drove them into some frenzie of murder but everyone in steppe was like that, Horde Life
, Mongols were different tho, they never came into the civilized realm before Genghis' invasions unlike the Turkic slave soldiers who didn't slaughter much and preferred revenue over sacking and destruction. the Abbasid caliphs paid dearly tho, for employing those greedy steppe slaves, they lost their power, lives and their loved ones and grew bankrupt paying them
Last edited:
Scythians were not the successful kinda horde tho, they're just steppe nomads, they defended their homeland quite aptly but they never had the eastern steppe resources especially horses and siege equipments and Chinese engineers to sustain a horde life, your average mongol had 4 to 5 spare mounts, the turkics and parthians had 2 and the hordes from altaic regions and in Mongolia came with in excess of 4 mounts so their numbers are often exaggerated in historical sources and yeah they did stop this wholesale slaughtering by the time Chinghis' grandson came into power, it began in China and subsequently spread across the successor states, prolly as they say you can't rule a people on horseback
Last edited:
Kalash are not muslim, you are mixing them with nuristanis.Yep, that's why a lot of Kazkahs, Tajiks, and so on look white-ish
View attachment 510936
Yeah, they are. Look it up wikipedia
Why does this matter exactly?
Dravidians are dark caucasoids tho, Abos are much more isolated and irl look very different, even their skull shape is different, even a pure ASI would look very different than an abo
Jfl, whats the source for that post?Seething Shitskin indian
View attachment 510920
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JALfFOP6_AQ
Just look at albino dravidians, albino blacks and albino abos. Abos are isolated asf, it's like 40000 years they've been trapped in Australia, your average caucasoid Dravidian skull wise mogs Abos to Australia and back, cherrypicking particularly ugly or recessed chin manlets like Aziz is a cope
The video said that most curries have the same maternal dna as those nigger passing Andamanese people who kill anything that gets near their island.
They say many such things, even those races are different, mainland india has many indigenous tribes who're not mixed at all and were isolated up until very recently even they have caucasoid skulls and r1a, they barely look anything like the Sentinelese, Dravidians were a Iranid farmers who migrated to Indian peninsula and were probably responsible for the Indus Valley civilisation before it got destroyed in mid-late bronze age from climate change, I have even seen Aussies and even Abos themselves saying how different they look than curries irl under such ill researched videos
Idk bro, abos look similar to curries to me, and their maternal DNA proves they are are related to the andamanese island people
Sadly the lightskin curries didn't holocaust the dark ones. and now curryland is filled with at least 80-90% ugly dark skin shitskin Subhumans, 30-50% super shitskins. Just thinking about how low IQ the lightskin men were for breeding with these shitskin goblinas and not holocausting them saddens me immensely.
Brutal, Mongols were truly low IQ. Besides genocide maxxing, they have done nothing of note. If they were smart, most rice countries would be partially white, they should have imported the blonde/redhead slav/caucasoid foids they conquered for rape and import em back into the homeland. Slowly bleaching their race.
Doesn’t matter if AASI were abos or their own thing. they are ugly Subhumans and their disgusting bloodline runs thru my veins and many others. Billions of curries are suffering due to AASI not being holocausted by the lightskins.
It doesn't actually, btw, you can't really change races like this guy shows, I mean how many generations of caucasoids would it realistically take to change an entire race and how on earth than they're shitskins, I mean the most apt example is in Turkey and in Persia, where ricecel turkics changed into majority caucasoid population and not the other way around, not to mention Southern India would have had a much larger population than any supposed invader, and what does he mean by maternal dna, curries and Abos don't share anything afaik
Last edited:
Mongols are still genocidal retards. Nothing of value besides holocaust maxxing. They also didn't bleach their bloodlines nor rice lands enough due to their lack of foresight.
The truth is the shitskins should have been holocausted, who gives a fuck who they are or what their DNA/origin is.
I mean when you're the military elite you could care less about "bleaching", I mean they might have had religious or shamanistic beliefs that required them to mass genocide no one talks about it, btw contrary to popular believes brutality seldom won them cities without struggle
Last edited:
Southern India was cucked by Brahmins from Northern India, who were sponsored to come to south indian villages to settle. We know that R1A paternal haplogroup is Indo-European. R1A isn’t as common in southern india as the north, and peaks around afghanistan.
Maternal dna means mitochondrial, descendant from mother to child, all the way back. The r1a from indo european and M from andamanese shows curries are a mixed race where the foids got fucked by the indo europeans, and dravidians in the south (who originate from Iran).
I mean give me some references, as I said we're talking about Dravidians who're a iranid migratory farmers who migrated into India some thousand years before North Indian tribes did and they're definitely not native, the only natives we know were the ASI and it's not given anywhere that they're similar to sentinelese and yea some native tribes do have significantly higher amounts of r1a even tho they're isolated, the maternal part is not found anywhere even the comments on this guy's video call his BS
"
[UWSL]Of course Indians aren't australoid descended, it's always been known. I think people just throw around the word australoid so loosely, which fuels such assumptions. [/UWSL] [UWSL]But your explanation too isn't accurate. The Andaman people genetically are actually closer to SE asians, than south asians. They are a distantly related to native HG ancestral group of South Asia, which diverged from andaman people a long time ago, so they aren't the same.[/UWSL] [UWSL]Those native South Asian HGs then became diverse themselves, adapting to climate & geography in different regions of subcontinent. Then came the proto dravidian speakers of Indus Valley in NW South Asia(Neolithic_farmer). They were Caucasoid. And after them came the Indo Euro speakers from Russia+Central Asia (Sintashta). They were also caucasoid. A 4th ancestral group for south asians is east asian component, usually present in East & hilly regions." [/UWSL]
[UWSL]Even Andamanese populations don't share shit with Abos let alone Dravdians, the only thing that makes them similar is dark brown skin.[/UWSL]
And what's with this BS stories of Brahmins going around fking Dravidians, I mean only left wing Dravidian communists talk this way, I'd not be surprised some of them find their way into academia in US, Brahmins were a priestly class, most lived a destitute even a celibate lifestyle
Last edited:
View attachment 510937
Btw, it doesn't take long to become a muslim anyway, it's just they need to recite a sentence, their kids dick will suffer the consequences tho
Yeah, my bad, though the Kalash are like 4000 people. I was thinking of Nurastanis. Their number is 300,000 and they're mostly muslim.
Yeah, I know. Countries like Kazahstan, Uzbekstan, Krygztan, Tajikistan are basically all Turk-Iranian mixture
Dravidians are NOT Caucasoid. They are Veddoids. There are 4 races in terms of skull shape
looks like Yahoo answers.
Rice countries like Kazakhstan/Uzbekstan/Turkmenistan are like this
Last edited:
Veddoid is a phenotype not a skull shape, here's a albino Sri Lankan for reference
W
Curryfail. On the other hand I'm not sure how well whites would survive in a lot of India with the heat.
If you look at where whites settled in South America and South Africa and Australia it is places that have a similar climates to Europe.
If you look at where whites settled in South America and South Africa and Australia it is places that have a similar climates to Europe.
The early Indo-europeans were a migratory people tho, they barely had that military prowess of the mongol hordes, plus India is not steppe, it is a very fertile land, India alongwith Ukraine are some of the most fertile lands on earth, so it's very difficult to find pastures in India for your horses and cattle, it was heavily forested that's the reason Indian armies never had much domestic cavalry, they brought horses from Central Asia and they'd not survive so they heavily relied on war elephants, plus I think the indo europeans tribes migrated into India and largely assimilated with previously present tribes, their elites being incorporated into IE elites, it was a migration and not an invasion cos steppe invasions are always very violent and brutal and it's across the board and we don't have any archeological evidences plus until the discovery of stirrups and saddle cavalry couldn't win engagements with infantry on it own, horse archery consequentially was just very difficult, innaccurate and the horses couldn't take much load and march for long cos their spines were weak and those horses couldn't take much human weight either cos without the weight distribution of saddle it'd break their back and you've to remember those horses were much smaller than modern day horses.
Funnily enough there are simply no temperate grasslands in India, cos of high fertility of the soil, consequentially no horse culture so the cavalry was raised from purchased horses which died out with in a generation consequentially the armies were infantry centric and war elephant centric, the army which faced Alexander in the banks of Hydapses had no cavalry and relied heavily on Indian heavy archers, melee infantry with swords and spears and war elephants, albeit maybe cos it was a small kingdom without much resources to buy Central Asian horses.
Fertile land means you'll have resource rich highly urbanised or feudalised sedentary civilised kingdoms who're difficult to conquer unless you're a rapine state with a significant strategic or tactical advantage where you're economy is completely dependent on constant warfare and sacking but since India is fertile the Northern kingdoms never had any incentives in undertaking military expeditions much down south, btw I think there were fair skinned people already in Dravidian parts and they prolly had a caste system as well with the elites having access to much better resources like every other contemporary civilisation.
Last edited:
Andamanese peoples - Wikipedia
Go to the the genetics section, it says that the Andamanese are the closest people genetically to the ancient AASI people. These were the people who were in India before the neolithic farmers from Iran arrived and established the Indus Valley civilization and such. The andamanese look like full on black people, and so do the negritos they are closest to.
As for Brahmins, they are not pure Aryan, they are also mixed with neolithic Iranian and AASI, hence why M mitochondrial group is the most common among them. Brahmins in later times weren’t just religious people performing vedic chants, but rather were scholars in various different technical fields. They were brought into many places in South India to settle and make the kingdoms more prosperous there:
Ostrzeżenie o przekierowaniu
www.google.ca
Yeah, they’ve been pretty much forced to convert due to the threat of the Taliban in the last many decades. Pretty sad, it would have been interesting to document their ancient religious customs and beliefs.
Last edited:
The same thing happened to the Europeans, R is a descendent of P a mongoloid east euraisan paternal lineage that happened when east-euraisan hunter gatheres raped white hunter gatherers in the steppe.
Rice cope
Im indian though.
(PDF) Early replacement of West Eurasian male Y chromosomes from the east
PDF | The genomes of humans outside Africa originated almost entirely from a single migration out ~50,000-60,000 years ago1,2, followed closely by... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
www.researchgate.net
I’ve seen this before, but I think the explanation was that these ancient Siberian peoples weren’t East Asian or Caucasoid, as the two groups hadn’t really differentiated at that point. So I wonder what the people in Europe and such looked like at that time.Im indian though.
View attachment 511476(PDF) Early replacement of West Eurasian male Y chromosomes from the east
PDF | The genomes of humans outside Africa originated almost entirely from a single migration out ~50,000-60,000 years ago1,2, followed closely by... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
View attachment 511478
Pure Caucasoid originate from the Middle East aka Scandinavian y-haplogroups, a Caucasoid west Eurasian group got destroyed by a bunch of mongoloids.
I remember seeing a documentary a long time ago on Nat Geo or something which said that the separation occured around central asia, and that there are groups there that have the dna from which both were spawned.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
