Sub 8 theorists believe you're incel if youre below 8/10 so a 7/10 man is incel
Generally? No man.
If you have a mental condition such as autism? Yes bro.
Sub8 definitely applies in some cases.
If you have a mental condition such as autism? Yes bro.
Sub8 definitely applies in some cases.
im a sub 5 theorist to think the average man doesnt get laid is delusional
sub6
@Ledgemund come in here boy
T
7/10 can get a 5/10
6/10 can get a 4/10
5/10 can get a 3/10
4/10 and below is incel
6/10 can get a 4/10
5/10 can get a 3/10
4/10 and below is incel
No
This. Although, I do think it is possible to be sub 8 incel if you aren't NT.
You have to be sub-8 IQ to believe such bullshit. The simplest reasoning and most basic social interaction will disprove the sub8 theory, it's always just been a megacope.
>Sub 8 is a delusional cope
>Sub 6 is a big stretch and is generally inaccurate with a few realistic bases in reality
>Sub 4 is law
Tbh
>Sub 8 is a delusional cope
>Sub 6 is a big stretch and is generally inaccurate with a few realistic bases in reality
>Sub 4 is law
Tbh
no, i'm not retarded
the worst sub8 meme is
"all normies are inzels like us too man"
one of the biggest copes of all time
the worst sub8 meme is
"all normies are inzels like us too man"
one of the biggest copes of all time
Last edited:
woody allen prolly slept with thousands of women but no one considers him a stud, cuz sex doesn't count if you're submissive or ugly, and it doesn't count if you can't fight other men off your woman, so sub9 is incel
This. The way I see it, 8 and aboves can slay. 6's get LTR's. 4's get cucked.
By that definition, obviously not.
It's really a bad way to phrase the phenomenon. Whether or not you're incel is going to depend on a number of things.
There's an opportunity for a thread in this, integrating the concept of "truecels", the economy of desire, "genetic inferiority", and what makes incels uniquely hated: normalscum and Incel-Tiers do have some place in talking about standards. Almost every incel is a volcel to some degree. After thinking, this is a big reason why subhumans like trannies have such a big problem with incels. Implicit in any lament of loneliness is a desire for a biological female in some semblance of good health and a rejection of them. They know "tfw no gf" isn't about wanting an obeast, a tranny, or a homo. Remarkably defective and screwy people get up to all kinds of depraved carny shit and we've tacitly refused to participate - all the better for it. In this sense, there's not even a "sub-3" theory if you drag along the very bottom.
On the other hand, "there are no guarantees below 8/10" or "holes aren't attracted to 95% of men". This means that only Chad can get away without some measure of allegiance to soul-sucking normiedom (although he always displays it, likely just out of an incapacity to do otherwise). If you're a 5/10, you can probably get a hole now and then by memorizing lines from garbage TV shows, running your mouth, and staging shows of social power against people beneath you. Anger then stems from the fact that holes enforce decadent social customs by restricting sexual access for 95+% of men and that getting anything requires acting like a base clown to some degree, more or less depending on how much your looks need to compensate for.
Last edited:
sub9 theory?
life is cruel for sub 10 men
sub8 theory is very real. However its not what everyone thinks it is. The meaning has gotten skewed a long the way
this
Aren't you like 6'5? So are you like a 6/10 6'5 man claiming incel?
im neither 6'5 nor 6/10 wtf is wrong with you
sub 8 theory is not sub 8 = incel
I know your tall dude, over 6 feet
4-6/10 are beta bux material.
7/10 is kind of stretching it, but it depends on the person. We should be using PSL ratings instead of IRL rating, anyways.
Of course, it is obvious that they are not getting the alfa fux.
I agree with this 100%
"Sub8 theory", "mentalcel" all these are just cope.
If you are less than or equal to 3, it's completely over. 4/5s might get something if they are very lucky, 6/7s are getting some but not plenty, from 8 the domain of chad starts.
Also this.
If you are less than or equal to 3, it's completely over. 4/5s might get something if they are very lucky, 6/7s are getting some but not plenty, from 8 the domain of chad starts.
Also this.
I've been saying sub6 since march 2018.
Nobody is saying that it's impossible for sub8s to get laid
But there is a huge difference between how females interact with sub8s and 8+/10 guys. Above average looking sub8s can eventually have sex with females with effort, but will never be able to achieve the efficiency of an 8+ guy. High tier sub8s can get hookups occasionally, but usually takes time, effort, and manipulation.
8+ guys literally don't have try to get hookups, their presence makes lower tier males practically invisible to females when they are in the same environment as them. Females think extremely alike, and a 8+ guy will be able to attract the majority of females, unlike any tier of sub8.
The sub8 theory is correct, but retards keep strawmanning it so it sounds stupid.
But there is a huge difference between how females interact with sub8s and 8+/10 guys. Above average looking sub8s can eventually have sex with females with effort, but will never be able to achieve the efficiency of an 8+ guy. High tier sub8s can get hookups occasionally, but usually takes time, effort, and manipulation.
8+ guys literally don't have try to get hookups, their presence makes lower tier males practically invisible to females when they are in the same environment as them. Females think extremely alike, and a 8+ guy will be able to attract the majority of females, unlike any tier of sub8.
The sub8 theory is correct, but retards keep strawmanning it so it sounds stupid.
According to that definition, no.
Sub 7/10 makes more sense, but it's not like a 6/10 guy can't get laid. The difference is the reason you get laid. A 7/10 and above will get laid based on looks. A 5 or a 6 man can obviously have sex, but often not because of looks (30+ yr old women settling, beta bux, arranged marriage, open cuck relationships etc.)
7/10 is objectively attractive to most women.
6/10 is not attractive to most women.
I think there's a massive difference between 6/10 and 7/10, much more than the difference between a 5 and a 6 or a 4 and a 5.
7/10 is objectively attractive to most women.
6/10 is not attractive to most women.
I think there's a massive difference between 6/10 and 7/10, much more than the difference between a 5 and a 6 or a 4 and a 5.
Last edited:
To an extent. I think certain locations harbor women who only go for 8+/10 men. Just like the area I lived in in Texas, California, Australia, some parts of Western Europe, etc. In those areas, it is literally impossible for even 7/10s to get laid.
I believe that sub 8 theory applies to personality defects. I believe that I serve as an example of this to some extent.
Sub 8 is Cope. It’s sub 4 if you’re white and prob like sub 6-7 if you’re curry
I don't know man I'm 5/10 at least for my country sure I would be less in the west but being "average" is won't do shit. you need to be 7/10 at least
Retarded theory sub4 theory is more accurate. Honestly even then there is a small chance at getting a female most likely through beta bux or the rare possibility of getting lucky.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
