SuicideFuel Are women superior? (Dnrcels DNE) (Modcels please read all!)

[Seahorsecel]

Women aren't superior, they are non-actors. They are a resource, and subject to the whims of the men on top.
Saying women are superior is like saying cattle is superior to men because men fight over it.

Men don't do things FOR women, they do it to ACQUIRE women.

How are they a resource? All information points to quite the opposite.

I can point to plenty of evidence of men being used as resources.

How are women subject to men in any way?

If they are used for sex and reproduction, why aren't they forced into doing it?

If women are non-actors, how come feminism exists?

This baseless assertion also assumes that women were deliberately silenced and kept out of leadership by men, past or present, which is largely untrue.

All the doing of men.
Whether their simping is successful or not isn't important imo

And why does that matter? Technically, kings are in power because of the doing of peasants.

cattle are used for food and leather
women are used for sex and children

False equivalence. You are comparing apples to oranges,

Furthermore, women are the ones that influence men, not the other way around

Non-verbal behavior as courtship signals: the role of control and choice in selecting partners - PubMed

In this work, we provide evidence based on direct observation of behavior in encounters of opposite-sexed strangers, that women initiate and "control" the outcome. In the first minute of these videotaped 10-min interactions, neither female "solicitation" behavior nor "negative" behavior is...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

used by who ? by the MEN who run the world

This is really not an argument. Men start wars to kill other men, steal their resources to pander to women.

the elites are men
why would they care about their competition ?

For female validation, again how are men superior in this case?

 

[Seahorsecel]

This

@Nate Dogg

How are they a resource? All information points to quite the opposite.

I can point to plenty of evidence of men being used as resources.

How are women subject to men in any way?

If they are used for sex and reproduction, why aren't they forced into doing it?

If women are non-actors, how come feminism exists?

This baseless assertion also assumes that women were deliberately silenced and kept out of leadership by men, past or present, which is largely untrue.



And why does that matter? Technically, kings are in power because of the doing of peasants.

False equivalence. You are comparing apples to oranges,

Furthermore, women are the ones that influence men, not the other way around

Non-verbal behavior as courtship signals: the role of control and choice in selecting partners - PubMed

In this work, we provide evidence based on direct observation of behavior in encounters of opposite-sexed strangers, that women initiate and "control" the outcome. In the first minute of these videotaped 10-min interactions, neither female "solicitation" behavior nor "negative" behavior is...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

This is really not an argument. Men start wars to kill other men, steal their resources to pander to women.

For female validation, again how are men superior in this case?

 

[Seahorsecel]

They're only superior due to the remains of a patriarchal society that has coddled, listened to their issues, infantilized them and centered itself around them for 10 centuries or so, they're only superior in inherent value I definitely agree, on the other hand I kinda feel like us men are the wielders of reality, the makers of change, think of any insane change that happened to our species in it's existence and who did it ? A man, men aren't valuable but they are creators of value and change in the world.

Also as men, we're supposed to be tough and deal with shit on our own, which in it's own a sign of superiority, independence, resilience, intelligence and freedom, I hate seeing men turn into practically women, needing ''men's rights activists'' and all that bullshit support groups etc, that's women shit, they need it because they're weak, find the toughest/most intelligent woman out there and guess what ? she's an ultra masculine girl who turned that way from life or have some masculine genetic traits.

Well, patriarchy never existed. I can prove that. Every revolution or societal change has had a woman behind it. Men create ideas, women decide if they get anywhere.

Tldr they're only valuable because of us men, once we drop that for them it's over for them.
The complete dismantling of patriarchy will actually hurt them more than they know because they're not ready to assume masculine roles fully in society and we clearly see that.
What I fear is that it might not happen and we will end up with a partial dismantle in which once again men will be serving their needs still. (kinda what we have in the west right now)

Kings are only in power because of peasants. Once the peasants disappear, it's over for the king. Does that mean the king has no power? Not at all.

I agree somewhat though. Gender roles are enforced by women because it benefits them.

Our inherent need to earn a woman's seal of approval is the only edge they have over us

That alone gives them immense power over men. Men are sellers and women are extremely fussy buyers. Men compete, and women choose.

Women are still largely at the mercy of rules imposed and sustained by men.

Well, peasants can overthrow their king at any time. But who is in power?

It just so happens that we live in a gynocentric era with cucked lawmakers (who are still largely male and figured out women are a more profitable group to cater to).

That just means they are choosing the lawmakers that benefit them and discarding those who don't. Most lawmakers are pro-female in some way shape or form anyway.

TLDR: Women today are more powerful than men (I wouldn't say superior since 95% of them are brainwashed NPCs).

How are they brainwashed?

How are they NPCs?

If anything, men are the NPCs that women mold.

But historically men held more power.

Can you prove it?

Any economic or social advantage foids have over men in soyciety is conferred upon them by men.

Well, that's not really an argument. As I said above, peasants technically give power and status to the king, but who is actually in power?

Their 'superiority' isn't a inherent property of being a female so it's not intrinsically linked to their sex biologically on a tangibly material and physical basis like men possessing physically superiority. In the inverse way, male disposability isn't a bug of the system but a feature built into our species naturally by design, if millions of years of evolutionary history and development counts as design for the sake of comparison here.

Female worship is the default human state. Every society panders to women in some way shape or form. Women also prefer the company of other women, unlike men who also prefer the company of women. Women mold men and create societal constructs and gender roles. The result is a gynocentric society. So yes, it is a biological quality in a weird way.

Women are only superior when it comes to sex because they control it. And they are perhaps superior as a collective then men because they unlike men don't have individuality.

Well, women have immense influence in many areas outside of the sexual marketplace. Feminism is proof of that. Various women's marches (Which inspired men to march) are proof of that.

 

[Sanega Salt Nigga]

Nigga, most of the shit they do these days is because of cucked male feminists jfl.

If the testosterone levels in the soycuck normfags skyrocketed overnight, you will see how the foids' "control" and "supremacy" would last.

Unfortunately the lowest T male feminist is 1400 NG

 

[faded]

dnr

dnr

 

[SubhumanGamer]

dnr

 

[faded]

Women aren't superior, they are non-actors. They are a resource, and subject to the whims of the men on top.
Saying women are superior is like saying cattle is superior to men because men fight over it.

Men don't do things FOR women, they do it to ACQUIRE women

convert to judaism

 

[Seahorsecel]

No far from it. They are physically weaker, age like shit, bleed once per month & have to carry tits when they walk/run.

Well, peasants and laborers were physically superior to kings, but who was in charge? The Habsburgs were inbred as fuck, but the peasants, most of which were purebred, were beneath them in power. (Can't link the study, pretty sure that was the case though. European inbreeding is relatively low compared to other parts of the world, based on @DarkStar's posts/findings)

Also, I'm pretty sure men age worse tbh. The only reason why rich old men can get women is because of their status. But I don't have any data to back it up, take my opinions on this matter with a slight grain of salt.

They are also super emotional & have little impulse control.

Do you have any scientific proof of that? Even if it were true, that doesn't prove that men are superior. In fact, I could say "Men are inferior because their lack of emotion makes them soulless bots, incapable of feeling" And it would be equally as true/fallacious.

Foids are just good at manipulation. Even when there confronted after being caught lying. They use there emotions to try to garner sympathy.

The Manipulated Man - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Basically this book, women use their social dominance (I remember reading that humans perceive female faces as having higher status, can't link the study though...) to get men to do their bidding, not unlike how a master trains his dogs.

Nigga, most of the shit they do these days is because of cucked male feminists jfl.

Well, the fact that male feminists even exist proves that women have power over men. Doesn't it? Women do and men follow. You're also assuming the right doesn't also worship women. It does at least equally or even more than the left.

If the testosterone levels in the soycuck normfags skyrocketed overnight, you will see how the foids' "control" and "supremacy" would last.

Testosterone levels were indeed higher in the past, but that doesn't mean women didn't have any power, influence, or control in the past. They very well did, and I can prove that. Also, do you have any data that male feminists specifically have lower testosterone on average? Higher testosterone societies generally lead to matriarchies, such as the Spartans. Testosterone doesn't make men turn on women. I could argue the opposite. There are so many big muscular macho men who make pandering to women their whole life personality.

 

[Lux]

Yes they are. Lux would prefer to be a woman than an incel, unless lux was a sexhaver.

 

[Seahorsecel]

In a way, I feel this post is just recycled water

It's water (pussy/sex is EVERYTHING pill) under a clickbaity engaging title

Not to shit on your post or anything, that just feels like the past 5 sort of "must read" threads i've seen on here, it's just water framed differently, or framed a little controversial

I think in the hierarchy of it all, women are only topped by chad, a male has a higher peak potential
As seen here

Women are 2nd on the hierarchy, below the women are all the normie 80% of men

No, men as a whole are ultimately subservient to women, that includes Chad.

Male behavior is directly influenced by female behavior, the opposite is not true.

Non-verbal behavior as courtship signals: the role of control and choice in selecting partners - PubMed

In this work, we provide evidence based on direct observation of behavior in encounters of opposite-sexed strangers, that women initiate and "control" the outcome. In the first minute of these videotaped 10-min interactions, neither female "solicitation" behavior nor "negative" behavior is...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Men in power are only there because of their female supporters and are subservient to their wives. The saying "Men are run by their wives" doesn't come from nowhere. Even if not married, men are still subservient to the demands of the general female populace, not unlike a puppet.

For example, the infamous Salem witch trials, which feminists frequently bring up as proof of supposed "patriarchy." In truth, it was more like nobility-on-nobility violence, both perpetrated and ended by women. The men were just their lackeys. The vast majority of accusers were little girls, not men/boys. The person who stopped the witch trials was the wife of one of the executioners if I remember correctly.

See what I mean? That man had power over life and death and ultimately still folded like wet tissue paper at the request of his female superior.

 

[Seahorsecel]

Thx for tagging me

My comment here

MALES are superior!

Why do you think so?

You can't claim without providing supporting evidence.