Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Are women inferior to men?

H

Homosapicuckus

Captain
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Posts
1,536
This isn't about the degradation of women, but the consideration of social aspects. If we take a look around the world in all societies men take the role, they feed the family, take care of the tribe. There's no alternative way of a society to survive if men don't take the leading role.
Who's gonna protect a woman if a man says she's equal and can hunt for her own.

Women are victims of the feminist trap that made them believe they can be equal to men, when the nature made us to be in-equal. Men is the protector, inventor, creator of words. Women who gave life to men and raise a God to take his father's place one day.

Incels are the failed men cathegory, you're still part of the tribe. There's men and women and there's also incels who aren't men enough to reproduce but you're still here boyo to help women cook their meals, help men bring back home the food and help to take care of a real man's children.
In real life it works how a chad made a woman pregnant and the woman let you to have sex with her as long as you financially support her and his kid.
 
they are superior

they hold all the power, all the keys, they guard all the gates
 
qbxNInO.gif


The reason women barely show up as inventors/scientists/intellectuals etc is because their proportion of geniuses (and retards) is much lower than men's.
Women have around the same average IQ as men but since most great things are built by a very, very small of extremely intellectually gifted people, most of whom are men, history is destined to be filled with mostly male names, no matter how much education women get.
 
Stefan Molyneux explained the information behind this.

If you view it as a gaussian distribution, men tend to inherent the upper and lower "rungs" of said graph. Which means, men tend to have both higher and lower IQ's than women. Eg. you'll find a lot of stupid as fuck men and a lot of intelligent as fuck men. Women tend to aggregate on the middle. Which means, women tend to be of average intelligence. Eg. you'll find less stupid as fuck women and less intelligent as fuck women.

Physically, men reign above women. In society, men and women tend to be alike, but more men will occupy positions of scientific/industrial importance due to them being on the higher IQ rung.
 
Men are not only superior on a physical level, it is apparent that they are superior on an intelligent level. Take a look at prominent scientists and historical figures over the years... There are significantly more males than females. More male astronauts and chess masters/grandmasters as well.

Women are also highly irrational and impulsive from what I've seen of them. They overreact to everything and take their problems out on others.
 
Yes the only time women are superior is when it comes to social skills and manipulation. I have never seen a man pull off shit like this with such vicious perfection.
 
Genetically? no

Biologically? yes
 
Women fuck and men work. For me sex>everything
 
men are superior to women in every way
 
I love women and celebrate their beauty, but they're retarded, but I also love that part.

They're better in that they are walking sources of aesthetic wonderment, but I'd rather keep them in a zoo then let them pretend to be doctors.

*shudders*
 
Anon said:
Women fuck and men work. For me sex>everything

Its because of stuff this I think women may actually be superior. The fact that men could create a real patriarchy is negated by the fact that too many betas have been manipulated by woman into serving them. By any objective criteria men are better than women, yet they pull the strings and have convinced us we are in control.
 
Women are socially superior to men, they're the gatekeepers of what's socially acceptable or not, and sex. Women will always win at the end, unless if there's sexbots, then their value goes down.
 
KyloRen said:
Stefan Molyneux explained the information behind this.

If you view it as a gaussian distribution, men tend to inherent the upper and lower "rungs" of said graph. Which means, men tend to have both higher and lower IQ's than women. Eg. you'll find a lot of stupid as fuck men and a lot of intelligent as fuck men. Women tend to aggregate on the middle. Which means, women tend to be of average intelligence. Eg. you'll find less stupid as fuck women and less intelligent as fuck women.

Physically, men reign above women. In society, men and women tend to be alike, but more men will occupy positions of scientific/industrial importance due to them being on the higher IQ rung.

This.

Of course, to an intelligent person, average people are pretty fucking dumb too. So yeah, women are all stupid, as far as I’m concerned.
 
Men are superior at most things. Just  take a look at how western nations are being eaten from the inside by female leaders and feminists women are so inferior that everything they run gets ruined. look at youtube...
 
Men as a whole and on average are intellectually and physically superior to women. Almost everything you see before you that is not natural, was built and designed by men. Most buildings, infrastructure, technology, science, art, music, books, software ... you name it, a man probably made it.

However, men have one significant weakness that has been thoroughly exploited by females, our high sex drive. But on the flipside, it's also due to this high sex drive and female hypergamy that we have been driven to build. This whole civilization was built by men for women. It was built so men could impress women or as a means to provide resources to women and children.

BUT, yes there's another but. In the past this sex drive was harnessed by a patriarchal Western society, and used to focus mens labor and female hypergamy toward advancing technology and science, through socially and legally enforced monogamy. Unfortunately now with women's liberation, the sexual revolution and "muh equality", this system, this social contract between man and woman, is breaking down. Women are reverting to their primitive Chad harem instincts, rather than reproducing with the high IQ average looking guys or the genius IQ autists, who are the true driving force in technological and scientific advancements.

Basically women are now in a stronger position in society, but not because of them, it's because of other men. Specifically the white knight cucks who enable feminism and gynocentrism. These white knights are both leftist soyboys and right-wing tradcucks. So yes, men are superior to women, but men also have one fatal flaw that women can exploit. If men become aware of this flaw and their own behavior, and change it accordingly, then who knows what will happen.
 
Men are better at everything except giving birth. A women is simply a walking, talking baby incubator.
 
Dingus_Incel said:
Its because of stuff this I think women may actually be superior. The fact that men could create a real patriarchy is negated by the fact that too many betas have been manipulated by woman into serving them. By any objective criteria men are better than women, yet they pull the strings and have convinced us we are in control.

After all patriarchy was nothing but an attempt to control women's sexuality. It was an act of fear mostly.
 
idkwattodowithlife said:
Women are socially superior to men, they're the gatekeepers of what's socially acceptable or not, and sex. Women will always win at the end, unless if there's sexbots, then their value goes down.

BlackPillDealer said:
Men as a whole and on average are intellectually and physically superior to women. Almost everything you see before you that is not natural, was built and designed by men. Most
buildings, infrastructure, technology, science, art, music, books, software ... you name it, a man probably made it.

However, men have one significant weakness that has been thoroughly exploited by females, our high sex drive. But on the flipside, it's also due to this high sex drive and female hypergamy that we have been driven to build. This whole civilization was built by men for women. It was built so men could impress women or as a means to provide resources to women and children.

BUT, yes there's another but. In the past this sex drive was harnessed by a patriarchal Western society, and used to focus mens labor and female hypergamy toward advancing technology and science, through socially and legally enforced monogamy. Unfortunately now with women's liberation, the sexual revolution and "muh equality", this system, this social contract between man and woman, is breaking down. Women are reverting to their primitive Chad harem instincts, rather than reproducing with the high IQ average looking guys or the genius IQ autists, who are the true driving force in technological and scientific advancements.

Basically women are now in a stronger position in society, but not because of them, it's because of other men. Specifically the white knight cucks who enable feminism and gynocentrism. These white knights are both leftist soyboys and right-wing tradcucks. So yes, men are superior to women, but men also have one fatal flaw that women can exploit. If men become aware of this flaw and their own behavior, and change it accordingly, then who knows what will happen.

These
 
In sexual attractiveness, they are so superior that I'm into drinking stacy pee to get a whiff of their superior genetics.
(IDGAF if you think that's degen, we are degen too genetically speaking)
On everything else men are way superior.
 

Similar threads

stranger
Replies
18
Views
830
stranger
stranger
Nordicel94
Replies
11
Views
591
CuntHater
CuntHater
Nordicel94
Replies
19
Views
414
Friezacel
Friezacel
Rapistcel
Replies
16
Views
398
Rapistcel
Rapistcel
Nordicel94
Replies
14
Views
301
Sigma
Sigma

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top