Pinpoint
Banned
-
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2018
- Posts
- 6,715
ppl told me quapas are rare therefore hm
LolThey just look like chinks coz dominant genes most of the time
do you think their mentally unstable fathers who go for hapa chicks were ever the zeitgeist? psycho men who want 1950s wives out of hate for women, were they as common as the lib media thinks? lolNo they're pretty rare for now, they will be more common in the future since geo/jbw maxxing is increasing
what would you put it at.I think much more than a million. Apparently there are 900k WMAF marriages per year in the JewSA alone, fucking brutal @pyromancer1234
5 million? Idk. A lot of them just put white when asked for their race (even though they look like 100% gooks jfl) so it's hard to measure.what would you put it at.
do you think your view of hapa/quapas being common is often dismissed as "lawl you end of the world coper"
There are about 18 million Asian Americans. The average person gets married 2 times over 60 years, so the average yearly marriage rate is 3.33% per capita. (This is in line with other estimates of 30 per 1000.) Multiplying, we'd expect the total Asian American yearly marriage rate to be 600k. We'd halve it to count AF, but we all know AF get married at least twice as much as AM, so we can ballpark maybe 400k AF marriages per year. Compare this to that 900k number: it's more than enough for all AF to be in WMAF twice over, which...seems about right, actually.900k WMAF marriages per year
IIRC the AMWF marriages are already 300k, there's something wrong with that math.Hapapocalypse when? Probably never, but it's nice to think about.
There are about 18 million Asian Americans. The average person gets married 2 times over 60 years, so the average yearly marriage rate is 3.33% per capita. (This is in line with other estimates of 30 per 1000.) Multiplying, we'd expect the total Asian American yearly marriage rate to be 600k. We'd halve it to count AF, but we all know AF get married at least twice as much as AM, so we can ballpark maybe 400k AF marriages per year. Compare this to that 900k number: it's more than enough for all AF to be in WMAF twice over, which...seems about right, actually.
Only? and not in america?IIRC the AMWF marriages are already 300k, there's something wrong with that math.
The napkin math is sure to be off. Where are you getting the WMAF/AMWF statistics? Either way, it doesn't take a genius to notice that WMAF is everywhere and AMWF is practically non-existent. And as I've pointed out a dozen times, the marriage numbers are less skewed than the dating numbers due to bananarangs.IIRC the AMWF marriages are already 300k, there's something wrong with that math.





