the fact that you're just peppering bluepilled crap with incel vocabulary, and: "i know it will lead to *insert negative outcome* but there could be something else to this" is just proof you've got an agenda here.
These studies do not take into account the amount of shameful women who will lie to look less shallow (yeah, we can see this is true because of the amount of short men who on average have less choices as far as dating goes)
as far as facial quality, you can fill in the blanks with the fact that you're not going to see a good looking, fit woman with a guy who looks like this:
You're more then likely bullshitting about being 5'1, but if you ARE, and you've been made fun of/rejected by every woman you've asked out (which in the case, would be why you're here) that's proof enough that these studies are wrong.
If your study really has any weight, then show me somebody who you know who's 5'1" who is dating a good looking female that they actually liked.
you can't find one, because very, very small minorities of women can tolerate dating a man that short.
normally I'd just ask for you to be banned, because it's obvious you're just here to push IT's agenda, and you're just trying to not be oblivious while doing. but i want people to see that we're not afraid to argue with the opposition.
