L
Anglo, nordic, and germanic whites are the only ones that matter.
Blackpill Are slavs basically white people without that supernatural majesty.
What about Celtics?
Also, Nordic is just a pheno. Germanic also applied to Anglos as well, before WW1 England actually identified heavily with its Anglo-Saxon(Germanic) origins.
And so does JBW only apply to those groups?
Western/White civilization also technically stems from Rome(North Italy).
Last edited:
L
When I say “Frenchman”, do you think of a white french person or a black/arab french person? Obviously you think of the white person.
Same applies here. When people mention “whites”, they don’t mean slavs. They mean the first tier whites anglo, aryan whites that Hitler praised. Slavs don’t get the privilege of first thought when someone says or types out word “white”, the same way blacks or arabs or asians don’t get the privilege of first thought when people say “American” or “Frenchman” or “Englishman”.
We refer to the top of the top when classifications are mentioned. If I say “American”, you should think anglo saxon. Like ethnics, Slavs are invisible and should only be thought of when they are specifically mentioned. Such as Asian American or African American, Italian Americans; Slavs would benefit from their own niche term.
L
There’s a lot of coping in this thread but pretty much, yes.
Yes , they are protowhites
are rice cels and curries gonna have way less kids bc their women hate their men and wanna feminist max soon.
the only ones who won't be untamed will be black women simply because nigs are psycho and won't give a fuck/ ironically too protected by liberal media to reprimand black men for abusing black women. which is a jewish thing lol bc it procures more black people to breed.
Didn't mongols fucked them up, slavs have shitskin genes
Well yeah, ofc I do.
Blacks/Arab "French" people are not French even if they were born there.
So NW Germanics
I do agree somewhat here, since NW Euros, mainly Anglos, essentially are the pinnacle of what it means to be White/European. They have the most achievements, highest IQ on average, are the tallest, lowest lactose intolerance, etc. and ofc, are generally the best looking.
Valid point. People do indeed think of the "best of the best" when the word gets mentioned.
When someone mentions "Asian" I think of a Japanese person, not so much a Viet, and when they mention Arab I will think of a Lebanese or Turk as opposed to an Egyptian or Libyan.
Well for America, I disagree since this country is a "melting-pot" so most people are going to view us as a wide-array of races or as "mixed"
The whole "le 56% face" or "Amerimutt" meme exists for a reason after all.
But for France or England, ofc no one will think of a Black or other non-White/European since they're not actually from there. They will think of a stereotypically(attractive) male from either.
Nowadays, I just see the "le 56 face"
Only around 20 million Americans are of Anglo stock still, and others(myself) have been diluted with other European/White dna.
Regardless, Slavs are still genetically & phenotypically classifiable as White. I have had many friends online who are Slavic, and they are generally(except sometimes Russians) accepted in the broader WN community alongside most other Europeans. They may not be on the same level as Anglo-Germanics, North Italians, etc. but right now Europeans/Whites don't have the time to debate this.
I also always find it funny when non-Whites/Europeans think they can decide who is White & who isn't. Not saying this applies to you, but it's just something in general I see.
I can show genetic data + anthropological stuff on this as well.
As I also shared, Slavs -whilst lagging behind the rest of Europe- still had achievements & Russia had the second or third largest "White Empire" in history:
Italian Americans are accepted nowadays as part of the modern "American White" identity, I have also known a few of fully/partial Italian descent who were White appearance wise & associated with other Whites such as myself. Italy, especially the North, also still contributed to acheivemtns past the 14th century & Rome practically is the reason for White civilization.
And as I said, all Whites/Europeans(native ones) share common genetic lineage, and were classified as five main racial types or what we now call "phenos" in anthropology:
Rices yes for sure, Curries just seem to keep breeding.
Yeah true, I mean who really wants Black women tbh.
The Mestizo(Hispanic) birthrate is currently the highest in Shitmerica though.
They have some Asiatic, but it's not substantial:
Mongols aren't Shitskin though, they're just Chinks
Last edited:
Another day another race-baiting thread
Looks high IQ, will read later.
Also race / ethnicity > nationality and anyone who disagrees is a globohomo faggot.
Based & agreed brother.
I have more in common with some middle-class European(actual one, not a shitmigrant) as opposed to some "American" of another race.
Cumskins do not have majesty
There has never been a single slavic achievement ever that wasn't actually just jewish scientists or political leaders
Cope:
And ofc you're showing "phull support saar" to Israel like the rest of your cockroach race does jfl Rakesh
What is “White?” A guide for complete novices
A beginners guide to “White,” containing all of the basics you need to know. This extensive article includes information on genetics, culture, archaeology, anthropology, and the ancient…
thuletide.wordpress.com
Based, I was going to cite this myselfWhat is “White?” A guide for complete novices
A beginners guide to “White,” containing all of the basics you need to know. This extensive article includes information on genetics, culture, archaeology, anthropology, and the ancient…
Do you have a link for the entire study? I am interested in reading it.
I see, it's just that I've legitimately never really seen Americans online talk about this stuff, so that's the impression I got.
I've even seen some contrarians and internet intellectual speculate what would happen and how identity politics and leftism if Americans cared about ethnicities as much as they care about races, since the income differences within races are even greater than between them
.I see.
Currently it's pretty interesting:
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/europe/comments/l21r3x/scientific_articles_published_per_100000_people/
Czechs and Slovenes are moggers as always, with the former publishing more per capita than Germans, Italians and matching Brits (even Israelis are behind them), while the latter are above all of those and in the 200+ league with the Scandinavians and the Dutch. We are just below the French, Poles are a bit behind us, and then it just goes off a cliff.
It's based on Scimago data, can confirm it's legit, I also used to look at that data a lot and still do regularly (ever since I've found those I've waited for us to overtake the French and we are still below them). It was pretty brutal to choose a particularly complicated field, like Number Theory in Mathematics, and then look at how much all black-majority countries combined, including South Africa, are mogged by singular, middle-sized and smaller non-black countries like Poland or Saudi Arabia
.Of course, quantity doesn't necessarily mean quality, and how Slavs do quality-wise is weirdly inconsistent depending on what you look at
.
The link between countries’ economic and scientific wealth has a complex dependence on technological activity and research policy - Scientometrics
We studied the research performance of 69 countries by considering two different types of new knowledge: incremental (normal) and fundamental (radical). In principle, these two types of new knowledge should be assessed at two very different levels of citations, but we demonstrate that a simpler...
link.springer.com
When you look at what percentage of a country's papers make it to the 10% most cited papers globally, Czechs and Hungarians (not Slavs but still EE) are behind India and around Brazil, and Russians are at the absolute tail end. However, those figures are just for physical sciences and engineering, as the researchers mention.
When you look at the Nature Index, which is another indicator of the quality of scientific research in a country, as it looks only at the papers that make it into a couple dozen of prestigious journals, Czechs are actually just, literally just a few percent below Norwegians and Finns.
Country/territory tables | Nature Index
The Nature Index tracks the affiliations of high-quality scientific articles. Updated monthly, the Nature Index presents research outputs by institution and country. Use the Nature Index to interrogate publication patterns and to benchmark research performance.
www.nature.com
Also, another study, which is possibly a new blackpill as it looked at the link between androgens and scientific output, includes a table comparing the number of citable articles in general, not just the top 10% or top 1%, with the per capita number of Nobel prize winners, which finds that they correlate basically perfectly, and it has Slovenia 15th, higher than Germany or Austria and just below Singapore which, according to the top 10% papers image I posted above, is the country producing highest-quality research in the world.
There actually is more evidence that Poland and Russia produce high-quality research at levels similar to (Poland) or lower (Russia) than Turkey, Brazil and India:
Europe produces more scientific publications than China and the USA, but the USA still leads in terms of excellence
"Dynamics of Scientific Production in the World, in Europe and in France, 2000-2016", published today by Hcéres, studies scientific output in the world, in Europe and in France. The report devotes special attention to the impact of the growth in Chinese output on bibliometric indicators for...
However, that says nothing about Czechia or Slovenia, and as you can see from that Reddit post, they are in completely different leagues than Poland or Russia. That is what seemed weird to me, since it overall seems that the more scientifc stuff a country produces in proportion to its population, the more high-quality it also is, which compounds and makes the country even more of a sciencemogger, so it would've been extremely weird if a country which per capita produces more than Germany or Austria just produces low quality slop worse than India does. If the low quality stuff really is mostly in other Slavic countries (and it's clear that Poland had been improving, as you can see their 2014 figure is similar to Japan's) then that just proves the Reddit map even more correct, and shows that this is the same as with most civilizational achievements when comparing Slavic countries, with Czechia and Slovenia carrying the entire Slavic world, Poland, Slovakia and Croatia just kinda standing there behind them, and Balkanites and East Slavs being basically hopeless
.It truly is bizarre and I don't even know what to think about it anymore. Anyone who will look at the race debates here and come out convinced that whites are more obsessed with ethnics than ethnics are with whites, or even close to it, will just prove himself to be a completely deluded person without any contact with reality.
I mean, that by itself is such a term, it should just be used more
.That is not from the Mongols though, apparently, it's mostly maternal DNA from some random migration of prehistoric Siberians westward about 10,000 years ago or so and from their females mating with the local males already there.
Also, as you can see from the map @DarkStar posted (and another chart me and him have posted a few times confirms this and clearly differentiates between this Siberian admixture and actual East Asian genes) Slavs have the same numbers of "Asiatic" genes as Finns (Russians, Belarussians and Ukrainians do) and Swedes and Norwegians (the remaining Slavs do), and considering that I've never seen anyone claim that Swedes or Norwegians are anything else less than the ideal of whiteness (seriously, people will sooner call a German or a Briton non-white than a Scandinavian) that alone shows you how "non-white" and "mixed" Slavs are.
Last edited:
Real Americans care about their ethnicity with regards to how its connected to their American identity (if that makes any sense). Like, an American would be super enthusiastic about being an Italian-American, they would celebrate this identity but not care a whole lot about their country of origin or its culture. It's hard to explain, but imagine it like supporting your local sports teamI see, it's just that I've legitimately never really seen Americans online talk about this stuff, so that's the impression I got.
I've even seen some contrarians and internet intellectual speculate what would happen and how identity politics and leftism if Americans cared about ethnicities as much as they care about races, since the income differences within races are even greater than between them
Regardless, European=White for Americans. Bigotry against Italians and Greeks is largely gone
OK, I think I'm getting it.
Thinking about it now, I've actually already seen stuff like Americans and Europeans of the same ethnicity having beefs together about who's the real X ethnicity, could've thought of that earlier
.
You're right jfl, a lot of immigrant communities have resentment for their home country because they were pushed out by an oppressive regime or were persecuted. Best example I can think of is Italian-Americans, largely hailing from Sicily and Southern Italy, having a ton of resentment for Italy because Northern Italians (the ruling class) were extremely racist towards them.OK, I think I'm getting it.
Thinking about it now, I've actually already seen stuff like Americans and Europeans of the same ethnicity having beefs together about who's the real X ethnicity, could've thought of that earlier
This, more or less.
Scientific evidence supports such claims.
Yeah jfl, they're more Nordicist than actual NW Euros I know jfl.
It's either anyone who is Caucasoid is White, or only Nordic-pheno Germanics are White.
And I mean, there is truth to this: Nordic phenos are the most appealing on average, and NW Euros have the most achievements, though not all of them are Nordic Phenos. Most of Britain is Atlantid/North Atlantid racially, Germany has major Alpine racial influence on it, as does France. I mean Hitler was literally classified racially as "Alpinid"
Yeah lmfao, I don't know what he meant by that.I mean, that by itself is such a term, it should just be used more
That term is already used a lot, in fact Slavs seem to have the most "collective" identity out of any Whites/Europeans. In the UK, the folks there go by "Welsh, English, etc." I've hardly ever known Scandinavians(aside from fellow Wignats) to collectively go by "Nordic" etc.
Correct.
Same goes for Meds carrying some Natufian & Caucus/INF DNA; it came from when the Neolithic Farmers(found in all europeans) entered Europe, and I think also the Etruscans may have influenced some of it.
But to some it up, White=European, and here's a good source another user shared:
What is “White?” A guide for complete novices
A beginners guide to “White,” containing all of the basics you need to know. This extensive article includes information on genetics, culture, archaeology, anthropology, and the ancient…
thuletide.wordpress.com
@Regenerator
Contains data, phenos, and other useful information: He's pretty based tbh, I'm even on his TG channel.
Users who might be interested to read it:
@LifeMaxxer
@Made in Heaven
@comradespiderman29
@Biowaste Removal
Last edited:
O
So true laugh out loud I look like the trash on the right.
Close but no cigar
Our women? Yes us as men sadly not.
Celts are genetic trash that are ignored by blackpillers.
Why are Slavic women hot but Slavic men are comically ugly
I dunno, but it's annoying
.
Fem"cels" talk about where they're from [Brutal Slavpill barrage, Slavcels GTFIH]
Jfl, check this shit out brocels. This is the top comment from a thread on their forum where fem"cels" were asked where they are from. Trust me, the rest of that thread was just like this:feelsbadman:. I remembered seeing this thread on their site when it was still online and I was occasionally...
incels.is
They are white. Its delusional to say they aren't
Because the same features that make women dimorphic have the opposite effect on men, and women and men of the same race, family, etc. at least share the bone structure. Conversely, Western women are overly masculine in their facial structures. Asian women are sometimes considered "cute" while Asian men are considered non-masculine because they share those neotenous features.I dunno, but it's annoying
Fem"cels" talk about where they're from [Brutal Slavpill barrage, Slavcels GTFIH]
Jfl, check this shit out brocels. This is the top comment from a thread on their forum where fem"cels" were asked where they are from. Trust me, the rest of that thread was just like this:feelsbadman:. I remembered seeing this thread on their site when it was still online and I was occasionally...
Where's the slavic achievement LMAO? Just barely above netherlands with 10x the population? A country of peasants and slaves
It's on the chart, dumb shitskin
You do realize that included tons of non-Russians who lived within its borders like Mongols, Turks, etc
It also showed other countries made achievements as well
And please, don't discredit other races achievements or project onto them when your cockroach race can't even figure out where to shit.
O
Lots of the former USSR nations are still traditional, and women are naturally lazy. Hence they put their weight on their father, brother, uncle etc. They don't work as hard and have lots of free time so they take care of their looks and the stress of live isn't burdening them.
A man's face is his autobiography. A woman's face is her work of fiction.
Oscar Wilde
K
Normie stereotype
Meanwhile curries couldn't even replicate 1% of that.
It's on the chart, dumb shitskin
You do realize that included tons of non-Russians who lived within its borders like Mongols, Turks, etc
It also showed other countries made achievements as well
And please, don't discredit other races achievements or project onto them when your cockroach race can't even figure out where to shit.
Ye both are on the same level looks wise.
Slavshits will always live in the shadow of real whites
It's on the chart, dumb shitskin
You do realize that included tons of non-Russians who lived within its borders like Mongols, Turks, etc
It also showed other countries made achievements as well
And please, don't discredit other races achievements or project onto them when your cockroach race can't even figure out where to shit.
Without jews your country is a bigger drunken shithole than it is currently
I'm not Slavic jfl, I'm a NW Euro blood
I like how you avoided the statement; Russia achieved more than Shitdia ever did or will even as a "backwards" White country.
And jfl at some shitskins Jeet thinking he can decide who is a "real white"
Now piss off nigger
A pine tree can't call itself an oak tree even if i'm not a tree... one thing's for sure, the good guys lost ww2, and hitler didn't kill enough slavshit
Doesn't even make sense but ok
However, those two trees are closer to each other & worth more than some dumb shitskin pajeet projecting online, since they give this world oxygen unlike Pajeets such as yourself who consume it.
I agree, finally a good take
I said I'm not Slavic lol, don't know why you're trying to irk me with this statement.and hitler didn't kill enough slavshit
I dont need to be white to look at the data and see: one side of europe conquered the world, high iq, the other have shithole countries filled with drunks.
100 years ago italians, slavs, other trash of europe were not considered white like anglos and germans
>No supernatural majesty
You fucking niggers make me so goddamn mad.
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
You fucking niggers make me so goddamn mad.
House of Romanov - Wikipedia
Slavic Native Faith - Wikipedia
Azov Brigade - Wikipedia
Rusich Group - Wikipedia
Russian Imperial Movement - Wikipedia
Atomwaffen Division - Wikipedia
Still better than Shitdia
Genetically, they are descended from the same groups.
And re-read what I sent, they had their own Empires & achieved more than fucking curries.
Jfl, Italy also had its colonial Empire
Rome also is the reason for White/Western civilization
A lot of that discrimination was due to religious differences also, look at the Irish.
And imagine thinking you can call those groups trash when you're a literal shitskin Pajeet, who spends his time projecting onto lower tier Whites because he's pissy his friend left him & he's reminded of his shit-colored skin whenever he wakes-up.
Those same russians put up a good fight against the high IQ germans. What's your point exactly?
Pajeets never have a point, they always go on tangents because they can't ever address anything directly.
Germans had 1 million bullets so russians sent 1 million and 1 men kek
Why don't you get drunk and throw yourself off a building like the rest of your kind?Still better than Shitdia
Genetically, they are descended from the same groups.
And re-read what I sent, they had their own Empires & achieved more than fucking curries.
Jfl, Italy also had its colonial Empire
Rome also is the reason for White/Western civilization
A lot of that discrimination was due to religious differences also, look at the Irish.
And imagine thinking you can call those groups trash when you're a literal shitskin Pajeet, who spends his time projecting onto lower tier Whites because he's pissy his friend left him & he's reminded of his shit-colored skin whenever he wakes-up.
And everyone knows rome was more nordic in the past kek, the current italians are basically arabs
I'm not Slavic jfl, I already stated that re-read what I said shitskin
Why don't you stop taking up oxygen & neck yourself, you worthless 80 IQ shitskin, instead of projecting your insecurities at being a fucking pajeet online.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
