Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Are Russians using Bakhmut to draw and destroy Ukrainian reserves or whatever last ditch conscripts?

ReconElement

ReconElement

GOC-in-C, V Corps, Death is for me
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 2, 2020
Posts
8,580
It's an U shaped cauldron at this point with trails and roads deliberately left not captured, Ukros being pushed by their jew leader to anyhow hold that piece of territory throw reserves after reserves to be destroyed from already sighted artillery guns
 
Last edited:
We are using Bakhmut to keep you making posts on an incel forum
 
It's an U shaped cauldron at this point with trails and roads deliberately left not captured, Ukros being pushed by their jew leader to anyhow hold that piece of territory throw reserves after reserves to be destroyed from already sighted artillery guns
No. Bakhmut was the only place where Ukraine failed to push back the Russians, so that's why it's important for the Russian army.
 
I'm thinking about buying property in bakhmut, must be cheap as hell :feelsLSD:
 
No. Bakhmut was the only place where Ukraine failed to push back the Russians, so that's why it's important for the Russian army.
Ha, westerner, think about your own problems, not ours
 
No. Bakhmut was the only place where Ukraine failed to push back the Russians, so that's why it's important for the Russian army.
It's more important for Ukrainians as well, zelenksy has made it a loud political objective and hence has been pouring reserves into it for months together
 
Comrade Colonel Boobov I've seen you fondling your big tits aide de camp Captain Anastasia Boobalova, what are you doing on an incel forum??
 
No one is quite sure what that dumb ass Putin is thinking. Is Bakhmut a pointless waste of resources? Sure. But so is the entire war.
 
Bakhmut is full of monkeys that get artilleried by nato weapons
 
It's more important for Ukrainians as well, zelenksy has made it a loud political objective and hence has been pouring reserves into it for months together
There are 2 reasons for why Bakhmut is getting so much support from Ukraine.
1. Like I said, it's the only "major" city where the Ukrainians failed to push the Russians away from, so securing it, will be very bad for the Russian morale.
2. Zelensky is a Jew and Bakhmut is the Jew town of Ukraine.
 
Yes. For Russia, the important thing is the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine. They aren't fighting a war of territorial conquest.
And Bakhmut is an ideal location to kill as many Bandera scum as possible
 
Comrade Colonel Boobov I've seen you fondling your big tits aide de camp Captain Anastasia Boobalova, what are you doing on an incel forum??
Those arent the actions you are looking for
 
They are just putting filler in the anime, in the manga that is not canon
 
Yes. For Russia, the important thing is the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine. They aren't fighting a war of territorial conquest.
And Bakhmut is an ideal location to do so.
Hahahaha, why so serious, westerner? For Russia the important thing is anything but that

Blame our gov
 
There are 2 reasons for why Bakhmut is getting so much support from Ukraine.
1. Like I said, it's the only "major" city where the Ukrainians failed to push the Russians away from, so securing it, will be very bad for the Russian morale.
2. Zelensky is a Jew and Bakhmut is the Jew town of Ukraine.
All of Ukraine, that is western Ukraine aka Lvov and the rest were Polish majority and had a huge Jewish population during Austro Hungarian empire era
 
All of Ukraine, that is western Ukraine aka Lvov and the rest were Polish majority and had a huge Jewish population during Austro Hungarian empire era
Yes, there were a lot of Jews in Poland.
 
There are 2 reasons for why Bakhmut is getting so much support from Ukraine.
1. Like I said, it's the only "major" city where the Ukrainians failed to push the Russians away from, so securing it, will be very bad for the Russian morale.
2. Zelensky is a Jew and Bakhmut is the Jew town of Ukraine.
Everything is a jew for you, right?
 
There are 2 reasons for why Bakhmut is getting so much support from Ukraine.
1. Like I said, it's the only "major" city where the Ukrainians failed to push the Russians away from, so securing it, will be very bad for the Russian morale.
2. Zelensky is a Jew and Bakhmut is the Jew town of Ukraine.
Don't you think opening the front in a new sector to relieve this already beaten sector of some pressure would be a better more operationally sound decision than pouring infantry into a U shaped cauldron with commanding height on one flank and already sighted guns emplaced to batter any tactical maneuver or even depots and staging areas
 
idk tbh, but heil putler
 
When is Russia going to reclaim every inch of Ukrainian land and behead (redacted) :feelsree::feelsree::feelsree: @wereq
 
Don't you think opening the front in a new sector to relieve this already beaten sector of some pressure would be a better more operationally sound decision than pouring infantry into a U shaped cauldron with commanding height on one flank and already sighted guns emplaced to batter any tactical maneuver or even depots and staging areas
Yes, but realistically, the only viable strategy for Ukraine is to inflict more casualties to Russians so that they may give up. Ukraine can't push back Russia to its territory, but it can deplete its supply of manpower.
Non-Russian and non-Ukrainian intelligence has shown the rate of Russian/Ukrainian casualties to be 5 to 1 (5 times more Russian casualties than Ukrainian)
 
Do you think Putin micromanages stuff like an autist warmonger or leaves it to army staff and subordinates?
What do you think) That's why generals and ministry of defence exist
 
What do you think) That's why generals and ministry of defence exist
Yes but power is intoxicating and there's nothing more powerful than taking or influencing tactical decisions on a battlefield or a map in the modern context, we've seen this happen with every leader even in democratic settings like with Thatcher in Falklands war
 
Yes, but realistically, the only viable strategy for Ukraine is to inflict more casualties to Russians so that they may give up. Ukraine can't push back Russia to its territory, but it can deplete its supply of manpower.
Non-Russian and non-Ukrainian intelligence has shown the rate of Russian/Ukrainian casualties to be 5 to 1 (5 times more Russian casualties than Ukrainian)
You don't really like Russia, do you? We will win, don't you worry, but it will take an absurd amount of time
 
You don't really like Russia, do you? We will win, don't you worry, but it will take an absurd amount of time
I've never doubted that Russia is more powerful than Ukraine. But all it takes is to inflict enough casualties to decrease its manpower.
 
Yes but power is intoxicating and there's nothing more powerful than taking or influencing tactical decisions on a battlefield or a map in the modern context, we've seen this happen with every leader even in democratic settings like with Thatcher in Falklands war
Democracy doesn't really exist, the leader is still the most influential/plainly rich oligarch

We, russians - we don't like this war. Nearly everybody dislikes it now
 
Yes, but realistically, the only viable strategy for Ukraine is to inflict more casualties to Russians so that they may give up. Ukraine can't push back Russia to its territory, but it can deplete its supply of manpower.
Non-Russian and non-Ukrainian intelligence has shown the rate of Russian/Ukrainian casualties to be 5 to 1 (5 times more Russian casualties than Ukrainian)
Ukraine is dealing with shortages in artillery and shells and Russians outmatch Ukraine in that regard with 1:3 or even more disparity, given that artillery is the single most casualty causing arm in the battle and Russians use their infantry very miserly how is this casualty figure even possible excluding the fact that it's Ukrainians who are trapped in an U shaped cauldron
 
Democracy doesn't really exist, the leader is still the most influential/plainly rich oligarch

We, russians - we don't like this war. Nearly everybody dislikes it now
Nobody likes war, but when you get orders, you can't mutiny
 
I've never doubted that Russia is more powerful than Ukraine. But all it takes is to inflict enough casualties to decrease its manpower.
It isn't a real war, according to our gov - yes, even now

Gov uses 300-500k soldiers there.. and you think all of them are going to be killed? We should stop being armchair generals
 
Ukraine is dealing with shortages in artillery and shells and Russians outmatch Ukraine in that regard with 1:3 or even more disparity, given that artillery is the single most casualty causing arm in the battle and Russians use their infantry very miserly how is this casualty figure even possible excluding the fact that it's Ukrainians who are trapped in an U shaped cauldron
 
It isn't a real war, according to our gov - yes, even now

Gov uses 300-500k soldiers there.. and you think all of them are going to be killed? We should stop being armchair generals
Even a 30% casualty rate which is very high, renders an unit useless and in dire need of reserves, given that it's mostly officers and NCOs who can lead assaults and can maintain cohesion, take more to train and their destruction can hinder the operational and tactical functionality of a battalion
 
It isn't a real war, according to our gov - yes, even now
Which is why Russia wasn't able to take Ukraine in a few days. It was thought that a few Russian troops would cross the border and the Ukrainians would welcome them with open arms.
Gov uses 300-500k soldiers there.. and you think all of them are going to be killed? We should stop being armchair generals
It doesn't have to be all. A significant amount will worsen the workforce.
 
A tactical and probable impossibility cannot be changed by writing articles in good English, assaults are stalled cos the cauldron is wide open left to lure reservists and reinforcements
 
Even a 30% casualty rate which is very high, renders an unit useless and in dire need of reserves, given that it's mostly officers and NCOs who can lead assaults and can maintain cohesion, take more to train and their destruction can hinder the operational and tactical functionality of a battalion
Smart, smart.. strange that you asked a question of who is leading the armies, but oh well, whatever

You both don't know what are you talking about. This isn't a war of yours
 
A tactical and probable impossibility cannot be changed by writing articles in good English, assaults are stalled cos the cauldron is wide open left to lure reservists and reinforcements
pdyde6jmb9qa1.jpg
 
Which is why Russia wasn't able to take Ukraine in a few days. It was thought that a few Russian troops would cross the border and the Ukrainians would welcome them with open arms.

It doesn't have to be all. A significant amount will worsen the workforce.
Workforce? Tell that to our government, it will import new central asians

You really don't know what are you talking about, i suppose.. war didn't make any significant reduction in workforce earlier, it wouldn't make it anytime soon
 
Smart, smart.. strange that you asked a question of who is leading the armies, but oh well, whatever

You both don't know what are you talking about. This isn't a war of yours
Wars are studied, Napoleon studied Caesar and Alexander, those wars were not his either
 
Wars are studied, Napoleon studied Caesar and Alexander, those wars were not his either
Not like you would be the new-age Napoleon. Want to learn about this war? Sure, ill give you all of it in a few words

Oligarchs fighting, war is scripted

Done. Also might add that this war isn't to be learned from
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top