so you are Turkic uzbek/siberian
I'm an Eastern Slav ( Russian ).
Btw, Uzbecks live in Central Asia, not Siberia. Central Asian cities were once highly developed.
Zyj-i Sultani (1438-1439) was the most accurate astronomical table and star catalogue of it's time.
Also Tamerlane was one of the few greatest conquerors in history, literally undefeated commander.
I don't think German history has such examples.
In the WW1 it was mostly France and Britain who defeated Germany ( at least in the Western front ).
In WW2 Britain won an air battle (1940) between Luftwaffe and RAF, making invasion on the British isles impossible.
They also won in 1941 and 1942 in North Africa ( 'Operation Crusader' and Alamein battle ).
Germany was winning WW1 , only USA could Germany.
In WW2 the UK alone could not win the war. In Asia they were completely defeated by the Japanese . In Europe they couldnt do anything.
If you mean UK and France slowed Germany down and made them untill UK and France were exhausted then yes you are correct. USA comes in afterwards to finish off the Germans. But alone UK could not win anything infact at the end they would have lost both times. It was always USA that won. Even the USSR got supplies from USA
No one says that they won alone. They won together with allies. Germany also had allies in WW1 and WW2.
But in the WW1 French and British would have won even without Americans.
The main German ally, Austo-Hungary was literally crumbling.
The Baltic German nobility considered themselves Russian despite their ethnic origin and were patriotic towards Russia as it served their interests. When the Bolsheviks came to power and targeted them, their loyalties shifted, and they adopted german ethnonationalism most notably in the form of nazism.
russia is ran by jews so its just jews allying with non whites
anyway whatever they are still jew lovers and their wonderful jews that they simp for are replacing them
It's not only Bolsheviks. The new ethnic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania also were against Baltic German influence, if I'm not mistaken.
And for some reason US remains the most Jew loving and supporting country.
I googled percentage of migrants in UK and Germany and it was 18% in Germany and 14.8% in the UK.
So Germany is in the worse position.
didnt i say it
and so what?
UK still has a hope to remain mostly white.
The Russians didn't play by the rules of the West. Thanks to their Asian genes, they have won many wars in the steppe. When Napoleon wanted to conquer Russia with his largest army in Europe, he was shocked and described the war as a war of annihilation. Napoleon was used to defeating the enemy's army and then having it handed over to Moscow. The Russians set fire to their own city, the scorched earth principle. The Russians repeatedly fled for tactical reasons and waited until their enemy was exhausted enough to give them the coup de grace. Goebbels also called the Russians vindictive (lol) after they repulsed the Germans and marched on Berlin. The war was fun until the Russians arrived. The Asian influences have made the Russians a strong opponent like the Japanese.
Nice explanation, in simple language to understand. Thanks brocel
It's not about Asian genes, it's about demographics. Even by 1905, Russian women continued to give birth to 7-8 children in their entire lives. Russia had what was of the utmost importance, namely quantity, while the West was fighting with quality. The Germans had better equipment, better generals, better supplies, and they lost anyway, because the USSR could safely play a game where, for the death of one German soldier, it had to sacrifice 4 of its soldiers. Exchanging one enemy soldier for 4 of his own soldiers allowed him to win. Even Marshal Zhukov once said: Do not spare the soldiers, the women will give birth to new ones.
cant do that today
so what do you think, are they barbaric in your opinion?
They are more “aggressive” on average i’d say & have a higher time preference, but they’re not barbaric
They settled Siberia, so they have a “Europeaness” to them for sure
that is only partially true. The Russians were initially poorly equipped. But their weapons were sometimes better than those of the Germans. Take a look at the Josef Stalin tank or the T44. The Russians were about to introduce the AK47 into the war. but then it came to an end. The Russian used ingenious inventions to fight the Germans. but the staff was extremely poorly equipped. They put untrained personnel in a modern tank.
every russian look different, some look caucasian, some look nordic, some look asiatic
Because Russia is a kind of Austria-Hungary in Eurasia.
Do you know Hitler's last speech? He says that if he had known that the USSR had rearmed itself to such an extreme extent, he would have thought about attacking again. He couldn't believe what large tank factories Russia had.
If you look at Russian military history, Russians didn't always won with quantity.
What about Suvorov?
Hitler was a German nationalist, not a pragmatist. Perhaps if Goebbels or Rosenberg had been the Fuhrer, they would have defeated the USSR simply by convincing the population that Stalin was worse than Hitler. Goebbels was the one who lobbied for the creation of Andrei Vlasov's Russian Liberation Army, he was well aware that the millions of Soviet prisoners of war that the Reich received in 1941 could have been armed and sent to fight against the USSR, but it was too late. Millions of Soviet prisoners of war who would have been drafted into the German army could have been armed and plugged any hole on the western or eastern front.
Suvorov made his name in the war against the backward and outdated Ottomans. I am Russian, I know my history perfectly well and that we have always fought with the number of soldiers, and not with the skill of generals or equipment.
So you forgot that he also fought against French?
Also Ottomans were a serious enemy. In 1915 Western Europeans themselves learned how 'weak' Ottomans were.
I forgot to add that he also fought against Polish insurgents.
In the Red army, NKVD detachments stood behind the soldiers, who shot all fleeing cowards on the spot, they were called zagrad detachments. Why couldn't the Germans use the same method?nah man. Imagine they had given weapons to the Russian prisoners
The Russians only used this method at the beginning when most of the soldiers were sent to war without weapons. As soon as a soldier has a weapon he would immediately shot back. he have nothing too lose...
They were created in July 1942, when Stalin's order number 227 "Not a step back" was issued
Nope. This method already existed in the First World War, so it was not invented in the Second World War. The method was used in the battle for Stalingrad so that the Soviet unarmed soldiers would plunge to their deaths instead of running away. but they had no weapons! That's why it was certain that they would die. When the soldiers were equipped with tanks and other weapons, the method was rarely used anymore. Imagine shooting at armed soldiers. that's most likely they'll shoot back.
Maybe the Ukranians would have been happy to fight for Germany?
Many Western Ukrainians joined the Waffen SS. I think for them the Germans were a lesser evil than the USSR.
Russians I know say Germans are cruel. Is it because of WW2 ?
I do not know, this is their opinion, I am a Russian and I believe that there is no difference between a gulag and a concentration camp.
This is what I said. They're more aggresive on average
Similar threads
[Whitepill]
35-year-old chineese man rejects work and marriage, lives alone in cave: 'A waste of time'
- Shaktiman
- The Lounge
Solid State
Users who are viewing this thread
