A
Asianmanletcel
overcel
★★★★★
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2018
- Posts
- 2,380
still AWALT no matter the age, at early age foids are taught feminazism and gynocentrism
Half the Pedos here are realy IT infiltraters trying to make us look bad.
Yes, all Pedos should be hung.
When I here pedophile I think some one who wants little kids. Those girls above might be jailbait but being atractied to them is not pedophile.Define pedocel. As technically it should only mean a preference for prepubescent girls, yet people refer to those attracted to teenagers as pedophiles, which is incorrect.
Did you miss the word "preteen" (9 to 12 yo girls) in my sentence?are you retarded???? "tight virgin teens" NO TEENS ARE VIRGINS ANYMORE. They have all been used up. Get that "virgin teen" shit out your head. I'm 23 and when i was in high school i swear all those girls talk about getting fucked by chads or chadlites. i swear u live under a damn rock
I'm a pedocel. I'm an incel and a pedophile, the most hated man in the world.
Stop posting these underage girls. Shame on you. Those girls are only meant to be taken by Chad. You're not even supposed to be defiling their bodies by looking at them.
Pedophilia is another product of feminism.
Pedos don't exist.
Jesus, so many bluepillers here!
Volcel if you wouldn't
Dude, at some point is blatant obvious everyone feeds on them to virtue signal themselves.
Even non-pedocels can't deal with being the lowest scum.
It's not people's fault they are attracted to pre pubescent children but they shouldn't act on it tbh.
Wanting to smash jb's is no where near as bad as killing, and it's way more common in men to be attracted to them than being seriel killers. Plus there are plenty of cucks who say, "I wish a sweaty post prime femoid teacher fucked me when I was 12." So it shouldn't matter when men do it.I often think about this and it's weird. Everyone is predisposed to become whatever they become. Can you blame a psychopath serial killer for killing people if they were born hard-wired to do it?
Bluepilled moralfag cuckTears infiltrator! The ultimate goal is to enslave women and make them our sex slaves, and they have to be trained as sex slaves from a very young (preteen) ageEven worse. do everyone a favor and go check yourself into the nearest mental facility.
Where did you hear that pedophiles have high intelligence? I've always read that pedophiles generally have low intelligence (and short stature). A lot of pedophiles are retarded people.Are you kidding me ? Why is it bad being a pedocell? the average pedocell intelligence is significantly higher than the average incel's intelligence.
.
There is no biological reason to be attracted to kids. It is fucked up plain and simple.
Yes, I would happily stab a paedophile.Hated by Chads, hated by normies, hated by femoids, hated by their fellow incels. They are the lowest kind of human being and they will probably end up being killed in prison after the police finds them. If I was one I would rope.
I dont hate fellow pedocels, I feel bad for them
And yet another proof of extremely low IQ values among cuckTears members. This one is so extreme that I'm 100% sure it was a legit foid, her low IQ can't even grasp the concept of slavery. No one will ask you for consent you little whore, you will be forced to please your master at his willBluepilled moralfag cuckTears infiltrator! The ultimate goal is to enslave women and make them our sex slaves, and they have to be trained as sex slaves from a very young (preteen) age
but clearly they dont want to have sex with u. otherwise why are u here? No one wants to have sex with u. not even a used up 60 year old hag.
Where did you hear that pedophiles have high intelligence? I've always read that pedophiles generally have low intelligence (and short stature). A lot of pedophiles are retarded people.
Do you have any articles? I only have seen ones like https://www.dw.com/en/scientists-find-brain-differences-in-pedophiles/a-16305968A lot of scientific research proved this fact.
It actually doesn't. The only reason to have sex is to reproduce offspring. Anything else is cope.Sex can serve other purposes besides producing offspring.
Do you have any articles? I only have seen ones like https://www.dw.com/en/scientists-find-brain-differences-in-pedophiles/a-16305968
I'm legit curious, I've always had a fascination with pedophiles
Well, if you want to broadly construe "producing offspring" to include stuff that's related to it (e.g. keeping the parents together, so they can both be there to raise the kids; how many couples get back together because one or both or them misses having sex with the other), then who's to say pedophilia isn't indirectly reproductive.
E.g., a girl could get married off while she's still prepubescent, so that her impoverished family can get rid of her, and so that the guy who marries her can get a virginal bride. If other men are attracted to 13-year-olds, but he's attracted to girls who are even younger, then he has an opportunity to grab those younger girls before other men get them.
Do you believe there's any such thing as an alpha widow -- a girl who fixates on the first guy who ever fucked her, and compares subsequent guys unfavorably to him, because that's the standard she has learned to judge guys by? In other words, she got spoiled by dating and sleeping with guys who were out of her league, and now she can't lower her standards and be happy with a beta husband because it's not in girls' nature to be content downgrading once they've experienced the best.
What about the statistics showing that the more guys a girl has fucked prior to marriage, the more likely the marriage will fail; what's the explanation for that?
Child marriage CAN turn out fine. Eunice Winstead (aka Eunice Johns) had several kids. That marriage was successful, from a reproductive point of view. But that guy probably kept her fairly isolated, in the mountains. They were subjected to a lot of stigma, so they withdrew from society.
Also, no one answered my question from an earlier post above, which was, if you believe in patriarchy, why do you give a shit if a father marries his daughter off when she's 9 rather than when she's 13?
Why do you care what another man does with his daughter? Patriarchy is supposed to be rule by fathers. As soon as outsiders come in and say, "You can't treat your daughter that way" or "You can't treat your wife that way," it's no longer patriarchy.
Not every father is going to marry their daughter off at age 9, so if you don't support that practice, then in a patriarchal society, why wouldn't you just marry a girl who's older, and then marry off your daughters whenever they reached an age at which you thought they were ready? Why meddle with others' families and tell them, "You have to abide by my standards"?
That's how we ended up where we are now -- people kept meddling with others' families, and telling them, "You can't spank your wife, you can't force your daughter to be a housewife instead of going to school and riding the carousel, etc." Instead of saying, "Let each family do what they want" we said, "Let's decide via the democratic process what are some standards we need to put in place to make sure females are treated right" and then we ended up with the current mess.
The best standards could have arisen organically, though, through experimentation and seeing what works. As it is now, a bunch of feminist academics churn out studies saying, "Child marriage is bad for girls" and probably any contrary evidence gets thrown in a file cabinet rather than published. And then our legislators make decisions based on biased "research". Most truly patriarchist churches, like the Fundamentalist Mormons, end up getting destroyed because of laws against "child marriage". Their leaders get prosecuted for banging the young jailbaits, and their property gets seized by the state.
As soon as you ban child marriage as a way of protecting, say, 3-year-old girls from getting raped up the ass, it becomes a slippery slope leading to a situation like what we have now. The feminists want to keep raising the marriageable age and imposing more legal and cultural "protections" for girls. They want to educate them and so on. As soon as you start giving girls any rights, we end up in this downward spiral of cultural decay.
We might not go all the way down the slippery slope immediately; it might take awhile, but it'll happen eventually.