Theory Are noodlewhores really worse than curry foids?

[polvorb20]

The shamelessness and degeneracy of noodlewhores, especially noodlewhores in the West, is legendary and unprecedented in human history. No group of femoids has betrayed their men so completely. The betrayal occurs in personal relationships, the media, and porn.

But are curry foids morally superior to noodlewhores? They would perpetrate a similar betrayal if they could. If, in some alternate universe, pajeetas were extremely attractive and had a very high SMV, of course they would flock to white men. But they are unable to because they are also mostly as unattractive as curry men. Curries regardless of gender are at the bottom of the sexual marketplace.

So what separates noodles from curry foids is not moral principles but options. Noodles have options. Curry foids mostly lack options.

But the lack of options for curry foids makes a huge practical difference. At curry social gatherings, half the femoids are not with white interlopers. There are some media depictions of curry foids with white men, but it is not nearly as prevalent as WMAF depictions. And there are maybe five curry foids pornstars compared to the hundreds of noodlepornstars and thousands of amateur WMAF couples on the internet.

So, are noodlewhores really worse than curry foids? In theory, no, but in practice, yes.

 

[copetillirope]

I hate curryfoids more because they act more manly, and are more primitive. Furthermore, they defile the white gene pool more with their pooplike skin color.

 

[Intellau_Celistic]

 

[Made in Heaven]

if currywhores looked more attractive then curry men would also look more attractive and we wouldn't be having this discussion right now

That's not how that works, and asian women being way higher smv than Asian men is proof of that.

The only curry women who look decent are usually pakis and they are held in line by islam. Though I have seen some cute pajeetas as well personally

I hate curryfoids more because they act more manly, and are more primitive. Furthermore, they defile the white gene pool more with their pooplike skin color.

Gook blood defiles the white gene pool way worse than curry blood imo

The shamelessness and degeneracy of noodlewhores, especially noodlewhores in the West, is legendary and unprecedented in human history. No group of femoids has betrayed their men so completely. The betrayal occurs in personal relationships, the media, and porn.

But are curry foids morally superior to noodlewhores? They would perpetrate a similar betrayal if they could. If, in some alternate universe, pajeetas were extremely attractive and had a very high SMV, of course they would flock to white men. But they are unable to because they are also mostly as unattractive as curry men. Curries regardless of gender are at the bottom of the sexual marketplace.

So what separates noodles from curry foids is not moral principles but options. Noodles have options. Curry foids mostly lack options.

But the lack of options for curry foids makes a huge practical difference. At curry social gatherings, half the femoids are not with white interlopers. There are some media depictions of curry foids with white men, but it is not nearly as prevalent as WMAF depictions. And there are maybe five curry foids pornstars compared to the hundreds of noodlepornstars and thousands of amateur WMAF couples on the internet.

So, are noodlewhores really worse than curry foids? In theory, no, but in practice, yes.

In theory all women are chad only. This is like if I said "the only reason white women are the most race royal is because white men are the best." Because we can see how white womem act around chads od other races, that so called loyalty flies out the window. At the end of the day, it's just a hypothetical that has no barring on reality.

 

[Made in Heaven]

No, because the things that make curries unattractive applies to both men and women but for Asians it only applies to men.

Both curry men and women would benefit from having lighter skin, better fat distribution and less bulbous features. For Asian men their failos make them more feminine, which have no effect on the SMV of their females.

Yeah I guess you're right. But I have heard indian women tend to have wide hip and long legs, but I guess that doesn't matter when their fat distribution is so shit.

I did see one pajeeta at work who had an amazing ass tbh, and very nice full lips. Caramel brown skin is nice enough tbh, no need to be lighter for me

 

[adharmi]

their fat distribution is so shit.

THIS, This is one of the biggest flaws in curries when it comes to physique

 

[Made in Heaven]

THIS, This is one of the biggest flaws in curries when it comes to physique

They would benefit from mixing with blacks tbh since blacks have very good fat distribution

 

[SmhChan]

Both curry men and women would benefit from having lighter skin, better fat distribution and less bulbous features.

and better living conditions. Curries in cities very much height mog and noticeably face-mog the rural ones.

 

[Trec]

The shamelessness and degeneracy of noodlewhores, especially noodlewhores in the West, is legendary and unprecedented in human history. No group of femoids has betrayed their men so completely. The betrayal occurs in personal relationships, the media, and porn.

But are curry foids morally superior to noodlewhores? They would perpetrate a similar betrayal if they could. If, in some alternate universe, pajeetas were extremely attractive and had a very high SMV, of course they would flock to white men. But they are unable to because they are also mostly as unattractive as curry men. Curries regardless of gender are at the bottom of the sexual marketplace.

So what separates noodles from curry foids is not moral principles but options. Noodles have options. Curry foids mostly lack options.

But the lack of options for curry foids makes a huge practical difference. At curry social gatherings, half the femoids are not with white interlopers. There are some media depictions of curry foids with white men, but it is not nearly as prevalent as WMAF depictions. And there are maybe five curry foids pornstars compared to the hundreds of noodlepornstars and thousands of amateur WMAF couples on the internet.

So, are noodlewhores really worse than curry foids? In theory, no, but in practice, yes.

Most white men just won't even bother with curry whores if they can just get a noodlewhore. They are too ugly in a lot of cases. Only a select few curry foids are attractive