Are foids deterministic finite automatons?

[Deleted member 10234]

Their brains are too simple and it's clear they really only have one purpose in life: reproducing and spitting out Chad and Stacy offspring from their vagina.

Even "intelligent" women are devoid of any ambition or personality. It's honestly extremely sad. When did you first realize women were nothing but cattle?

 

[BrendioEEE]

Women have less neural synapses and even if they had the same cognitive capabilities they're so drugged out on estrogen they are incapable of making rational decisions.

 

[Hunter]

high IQ

 

[Deleted member 6101]

More or less.
I've had better "conversations" with a replika chatbot than with a woman.

 

[Gremlincel]

Essentially 'bone scanning machines'.

 

[Deleted member 7573]

We all are, the difference is how much states and complexity is needed to reach the final state, in case foids the complexity and necessary combinations are minimal, not to mention that for an incel to reach a dead state is much easier than a foid

 

[Deleted member 10234]

We all are, the difference is how much states and complexity is needed to reach the final state, in case foids the complexity and necessary combinations are minimal, not to mention that for an incel to reach a dead state is much easier than a foid

Cope if you think male brains can be expressed by finite automatons which are even computationally lesser than pushdown automata and Turing machines (and modern Turing machines themselves can't even solve basic AI problems- some men speculate (male) brains are quantum computers or even beyond).

 

[Deleted member 7573]

Cope if you think male brains can be expressed by finite automatons which are even computationally lesser than pushdown automata and Turing machines.

cope if you think human brains can't be represented by finite automatons

some men speculate (male) brains are quantum computers or even beyond

some men speculate a lot of bullshit

 

[Deleted member 10234]

cope if you think human brains can't be represented by finite automatons

some men speculate a lot of bullshit

Cope if you think men like Von Neumann and Newton were finite automatons.

 

[kernkraft]

Definitely

I believe they are more Machiavellian than men as well

 

[Deleted member 7573]

Cope if you think men like Von Neumann and Newton were finite automatons.

Tell me do you think a machine can learn by analogy?

 

[Deleted member 10234]

Tell me do you think a machine can learn by analogy?

Finite automata cannot learn by definition since its set of states is both finite and fixed

Definitely

I believe they are more Machiavellian than men as well

Fact. Foids have no conscience and I don't believe they can even sympathize with men.

 

[Deleted member 7573]

Finite automata cannot learn by definition since its set of states is both finite and fixed

No human mind have a infinite numbers of states, this is just cope, and the inputs can be reduced to only two digits, the problem is that you assume that you need to know all the states and that the number of states cannot be close to infinite, it will never be infinite but it will be a close fixed number of states near the infinite, also I'm drunk so hit me again

 

[Deleted member 6101]

Cope if you think men like Von Neumann and Newton were finite automatons.

Well, due to the laws of physics, we're either deterministic (most likely) or probabilistic (somewhat less likely and we're just not advanced enough to know it)- in both scenarios the brain is practically just a deterministic turing-complete machine, which is basically a deterministic finite state machine but with "tape" memory.
How are entry-level compsci classes treating you, OP?

 

[Deleted member 10234]

Well, due to the laws of physics, we're either deterministic (most likely) or probabilistic (somewhat less likely and we're just not advanced enough to know it)- in both scenarios the brain is practically just a deterministic turing-complete machine, which is basically a deterministic finite state machine but with "tape" memory.
How are entry-level compsci classes treating you, OP?

Cope if you think the male brain can be expressed by a Turing machine. Modern AI can only solve problems humans can trivially solve and I doubt it will advance past this state especially when genius scientists like Penrose, Hameroff, and top minds of the AI community agree.

It's also obvious I was referring to finite automatons and not Turing machines which you clearly can't understand in your post above. Logic taught to grade schoolers must be treating you poorly if you can't understand basic logic.

First let me break it down a little bit for you because you're clearly both an asshole and you lack rudimentary computer science knowledge. A deterministic finite state machine IS NOT THE SAME THING as a deterministic finite automata. And for the love of StBlackOps2Cel you better not start arguing with me about SET THEORY next because YES there is such a thing as one being a SUPERSET of something else WHILE STILL NOT BEING THE SAME. There are two (common) types of deterministic finite-state machines known as the Moore and Mealy machines which differ in the following ways: A moore and mealy machine has an output function and no set of accepting states compared to deterministic finite automata.

The fact of the matter is a turing machine can be thought of (by laymans, like yourself, of course this wouldn't hold up in REAL computer science but sufficies for lowIQ mongoloids like yourself) as a deterministic finite state machine with tape but not as a deterministic finite automaton with tape because clearly you can't read and only know what was taught to you in your highschool CS class to know anything else... The words are similar right? Oh yeah, sure they are, so they must be the same! <- Your retarded logic.

So you've clearly fucked up twice here in thinking that a finite state machine is the same as a deterministic automaton and that a turing machine was equivalent to a deterministic finite state machine.

You're honestly retarded. Absolutely trash person. Of all the people I've met, I can say with certainty that you deserve to be an incel. But nobody else here (including me) does. You just got schooled, stupid skid noob.

 

[Deleted member 6101]

Cope if you think the male brain can be expressed by a Turing machine.

What do you think it actually is, OP? Enlighten me.

 

[Gyros_Pretcel]

So are we. It's over.

 

[Deleted member 10234]

What do you think it actually is, OP? Enlighten me.

I love how you resort to normie ad-hominem attacks after I completely schooled you in basic computer science after your condescending asshole comment. Address my reply (which I very well explain everything) or kindly fuck off out of my thread.

The sad part is I'm not even a computer science major. Yet how do I know more computer science than you, to school you in such a thing?

JFL at thinking a finite automaton is the same as a finite state machine and then making claims that I claimed Vonn Neumann's brain couldn't be expressed as a Turing machine (when I very well did not say that above, but I'm saying that now, of course). You need to learn some basic reading comprehension, learn basic computer science, and stop being an asshole.

 

[Deleted member 6101]

I love how you resort to normie ad-hominem attacks after I completely schooled you in basic computer science after your condescending asshole comment.

It wasn't really aiming at being condescending, since it defeats the purpose of this place- no reason to get so riled up, OP.

Then again, what's your point, exactly- that male brains are (speculated) to be quantum computers. Does that give them special properties? What motivates you to think neural pathways are different in females than in males, as to facilitate a completely different mode of thinking? Is male thinking somehow non-deterministic?

 

[Deleted member 10234]

It wasn't really aiming at being condescending, since it defeats the purpose of this place- no reason to get so riled up, OP.

Then again, what's your point, exactly- that male brains are (speculated) to be quantum computers. Does that give them special properties? What motivates you to think neural pathways are different in females than in male, as to facilitate a completely different mode of thinking? Is male thinking somehow non-deterministic?

Obviously me claiming female brains as being deterministic automatons is just a hyperbole. The purpose of this thread was to discuss how foids are but lowly cattle.