Rapistcel
Loser in the game of life.
★★★★★
- Joined
- May 25, 2024
- Posts
- 25,204
- Online time
- 4d 15h
It is allowed or it breaks the "animal abuse" rule?
@FEMCELS FANTASY
@FEMCELS FANTASY
I have attended to both bullfights and roaster fights in real life but I get that those things aren't gonna be popular here.I hope you don't become the bull version of retardfuel![]()
I've seen them on the now banned r/thebullwins . From my understanding, it should count as animal abuse, because it is painful for the bulls.I have attended to both bullfights and roaster rights in real life but I get that those things aren't gonna be popular here.
It's legal here.I've seen them on the now banned r/thebullwins . From my understanding, it should count as animal abuse, because it is painful for the bulls.
When I hear "animal abuse" I assume it means domestic animals.I've seen them on the now banned r/thebullwins . From my understanding, it should count as animal abuse, because it is painful for the bulls.
Killing an animal instantaneously for food [which is an essential] is not the same as prolonging suffering voluntarily for enjoyment [which is not an essential].It's legal here.
I have very negative views of people here who want to ban it, they complain about it a lot but when they are eating meat they don't start thinking about how much those animals have suffered before you eat them.
One can argue that bullfighting is also for food, there are families who survive because of it and some bullfights generate benefit money that it's used to food for homeless people.Killing an animal instantaneously for food [which is an essential] is not the same as prolonging suffering voluntarily for enjoyment [which is not an essential].
Bull fighting involves the later because the bulls are given drugs to stay alive and thrown spears at all parts of their body till they die of bleeding.
The two things are not remotely similar.
Right. But you missed my argument. They're reaching the food through prolonged suffering which is entirely not needed. If they were killed like chickens are, that would be a different case.One can argue that bullfighting is also for food, there are families who survive because of it and some bullfights generate benefit money that it's used to food for homeless people.
That's a huge cope, an average cow suffers 100 times more than the bull suffers.Killing an animal instantaneously for food [which is an essential] is not the same as prolonging suffering voluntarily for enjoyment [which is not an essential].
Bull fighting involves the later because the bulls are given drugs to stay alive and thrown spears at all parts of their body till they die of bleeding.
The two things are not remotely similar.
Natural law if you ask me.That's a huge cope, an average cow suffers 100 times more than the bull suffers.
Also, the bull can save it life if it's a good one (I have seen it multiple times), if the bull does it well the bullfight president forgives it life.
Also, the bull also inherently wants to kill the bullfighter (and has done it multiple times) so I don't see it as an inmoral thing.
I don't know about rules but I'd love to see dogs fight each other and dogs being killed or beaten up very hardI have attended to both bullfights and roaster fights in real life but I get that those things aren't gonna be popular here.
I'm neither a dog fan or a dog hater.I don't know about rules but I'd love to see dogs fight each other and dogs being killed or beaten up very hard





