
jerkjocky
mentally chad
★★★
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2022
- Posts
- 4,250
In the context of AI prompts, the idea that generalized language input is going to be the same or better as specific technically acute input is absurd.
AI is a hundred-fold more powerful the more intelligent and focused the prompt is.
When the AI's ability is widened to the point of being able to create technically sophisticated content from unsophisticated mentally retarded coom-soomer's prompts, autistics laminate the downfall of the programmer and related jobs. It couldn't be farther from the truth.
AI will forever and always be more powerful in the hands of those who can speak the related language. The idea that a tenured doctor's AI prompts and a fat soycuck's prompts are going to equal the same result in the axis of medical advancement is absurd. This applies to all areas.
AI will not be replacing anyone, that is, if you use it. The only people AI will replace are those who refuse to use the technology. Which in the field of technology, that is already the case with advancements and people who refuse to learn new skills with new times.
AI is a hundred-fold more powerful the more intelligent and focused the prompt is.
When the AI's ability is widened to the point of being able to create technically sophisticated content from unsophisticated mentally retarded coom-soomer's prompts, autistics laminate the downfall of the programmer and related jobs. It couldn't be farther from the truth.
AI will forever and always be more powerful in the hands of those who can speak the related language. The idea that a tenured doctor's AI prompts and a fat soycuck's prompts are going to equal the same result in the axis of medical advancement is absurd. This applies to all areas.
AI will not be replacing anyone, that is, if you use it. The only people AI will replace are those who refuse to use the technology. Which in the field of technology, that is already the case with advancements and people who refuse to learn new skills with new times.