Anyone else has an unibrow?

[Weed]

Imagine being me, being blonde and having unibrow at the same time LOL


My body started producing it when I hit puberty, and since a girl in the class made fun of me when I was 13(shit is stuck to me lol) I started shaving it off.. Maybe one day I will get a laser surgery but I am alright with just shaving it for now, gotta save up for that sliding genioplasty.

 

[blickpall]

I have a very light one. Like literally 5-6 hairs, but it's enough to be noticeable if I don't shave like you.

The problem with shaving it is that when I do, I have to be very careful how I space my brows because of my crooked nose. If I fuck up even a little bit, it accentuates how crooked my nose is.

 

[builderseed]

A few odd hairs, not noticeable unless someone gets right in my face. Still, I sometimes take a few passes with a razor.

 

[Dekim]

Shaving lol, you guys know nothing about looksmaxing. You pluck the hair, not shave it. Shaving it just makes it a lot worse long term.

 

[Jockcel]

Aye

 

[blickpall]

Shaving lol, you guys know nothing about looksmaxing. You pluck the hair, not shave it. Shaving it just makes it a lot worse long term.

The "shaving hair makes hair grow more/faster/thicker" meme is straight up pseudoscience. Plucking is only preferred for eyebrows for normies because it is used to detail the shape of the eyebrow, which is easier to achieve than it would be with a razor and with less risk of fucking up. Plucked hairs grow back too.

 

[Dekim]

The "shaving hair makes hair grow more/faster/thicker" meme is straight up pseudoscience. Plucking is only preferred for eyebrows for normies because it is used to detail the shape of the eyebrow, which is easier to achieve than it would be with a razor and with less risk of fucking up. Plucked hairs grow back too.

Plucking allows for better shaping, lasts longer and doesn't make your eyebrows all bushy.

 

[Themisterpepsi]

Imagine being me, being blonde and having unibrow at the same time LOL

Damn, truecel hours

 

[Felix97]

Shaving lol, you guys know nothing about looksmaxing. You pluck the hair, not shave it. Shaving it just makes it a lot worse long term.

No it doesn‘t make it worse. That‘s a myth. By that logic I could get a beard by shaving my babyface. Doesn‘t happen. I shave my eyebrows since years and it looks fine.

 

[RageAgainstTDL]

Imagine being me, being blonde and having unibrow at the same time LOL


My body started producing it when I hit puberty, and since a girl in the class made fun of me when I was 13(shit is stuck to me lol) I started shaving it off.. Maybe one day I will get a laser surgery but I am alright with just shaving it for now, gotta save up for that sliding genioplasty.

Don't shave it you retard. Pluck it out with tweezers.

 

[ColdPillow]

I have one but I shave the middle part

 

[Deleted member 1042]

I used to. I take care of it when it starts to get put of hand.

 

[blickpall]

Plucking allows for better shaping, lasts longer and doesn't make your eyebrows all bushy.

First two points are correct, last point is you trying to reiterate the same pseudoscience.

 

[Dekim]

I live in an expensive zone and it still costs 5 bucks to get my eyebrows shaped by a professional, you guys who shave them are straight up volcel in terms of effort.

 

[blickpall]

I live in an expensive zone and it still costs 5 bucks to get my eyebrows shaped by a professional, you guys who shave them are straight up volcel in terms of effort.

If you think it's your eyebrows that are holding you back from getting laid then you are delusional.

 

[Dekim]

If you think it's your eyebrows that are holding you back from getting laid then you are delusional.

It's not my eyebrows, but having good eyebrows helps more than having bushy ones

 

[Henry de Montherlant]

I pluck because it's easier to make it look better and natural than just shaving according to me.

 

[blickpall]

It's not my eyebrows, but having good eyebrows helps more than having bushy ones

Polishing a turd doesn't make it not a turd.

 

[Dekim]

Polishing a turd doesn't make it not a turd.

Cope. That's just an excuse to be lazy and do no looksmaxing. I started looksmaxing at the beginning of this year and I've made good gains.

 

[Deleted member 6626]

Strong unibrow makes a good McDonald's sign.

 

[blickpall]

Cope. That's just an excuse to be lazy and do no looksmaxing. I started looksmaxing at the beginning of this year and I've made good gains.

Or maybe some people's eyebrow situation is not so severe that they need plucking? I am happy for your gains but to argue that JUST plucking your eyebrows (which costs more here than it does where you live by the way) will somehow counteract a fucked up face, being a gigamanlet, or any other classic incel trait beyond bad eyebrows is bluepilled nonsense. A full looksmax regimen may raise someone's SMV depending on where they start from, like normie to Chadlite or 4/10 to 5/10, but to a 2/10 it is pretty pointless. Calling others "lazy" as a blanket statement for anyone that doesn't pluck is you just egoboosting by trying to put others down.

 

[NEETAndTidy]

Yes. I pluck it though

 

[Dekim]

Or maybe some people's eyebrow situation is not so severe that they need plucking? I am happy for your gains but to argue that JUST plucking your eyebrows (which costs more here than it does where you live by the way) will somehow counteract a fucked up face, being a gigamanlet, or any other classic incel trait beyond bad eyebrows is bluepilled nonsense. A full looksmax regimen may raise someone's SMV depending on where they start from, like normie to Chadlite or 4/10 to 5/10, but to a 2/10 it is pretty pointless. Calling others "lazy" as a blanket statement for anyone that doesn't pluck is you just egoboosting by trying to put others down.

Hardly anyone here is that low on the scale. I've rated many people here and 99% aren't bad looking but have done 0 looksmaxing and therefore look worse. One of the NEETs here is actually a potential Chad, but he looks like a 2/10 rn due to being overweight and having Tarzan hair/beard.

 

[blickpall]

Hardly anyone here is that low on the scale. I've rated many people here and 99% aren't bad looking but have done 0 looksmaxing and therefore look worse. One of the NEETs here is actually a potential Chad, but he looks like a 2/10 rn due to being overweight and having Tarzan hair/beard.

Sampling bias. You only saw the photos of people who are willing to take a selfie and share it with an anon on the internet. It serves to logic that you're only getting the cream of the crop. This is not the foundation upon which you can make broad stroke statements about the entire population.

A good parallel would be if you hosted an open invitation basketball dunking contest in your city. Only people who have even a remote chance of getting to the rim would show up to participate. From this, given your logic, you would conclude "hardly anyone here has less than a 20 inch vertical and is shorter than 6 foot." You're again using bad science.

 

[Weed]

Shaving lol, you guys know nothing about looksmaxing. You pluck the hair, not shave it. Shaving it just makes it a lot worse long term.

Yeah I did not mean to say shave. I have a special tool that removes hair lul, it's like plucking tbhtbh

 

[Dekim]

Sampling bias. You only saw the photos of people who are willing to take a selfie and share it with an anon on the internet. It serves to logic that you're only getting the cream of the crop. This is not the foundation upon which you can make broad stroke statements about the entire population.

A good parallel would be if you hosted an open invitation basketball dunking contest in your city. Only people who have even a remote chance of getting to the rim would show up to participate. From this, given your logic, you would conclude "hardly anyone here has less than a 20 inch vertical and is shorter than 6 foot." You're again using bad science.

I'm using the available data. Saying that the rest of the community is ugly is pure speculation, as we've seen numerous times that people who claim truecel status later reveal themselves and they are gl or very gl.

 

[blickpall]

I'm using the available data. Saying that the rest of the community is ugly is pure speculation, as we've seen numerous times that people who claim truecel status later reveal themselves and they are gl or very gl.

Your available data is still subject to selection bias. I don't see how you don't see that.

 

[Dekim]

Your available data is still subject to selection bias. I don't see how you don't see that.

Even if so, it is still data. Not completely accurate data is still more accurate than speculations

 

[blickpall]

Even if so, it is still data. Not completely accurate data is still more accurate than speculations

How many is "many" incels you have rated? Was the data randomly selected? Data on its own is not enough to draw inferences about a population unless it is statistically significant and was sampled without bias. It's just data. Being able to determine that the data is likely to not be representative of the population is a valid pre-analysis approach - which is what I am doing. Bad data leads to bad extrapolations.

 

[Dekim]

How many is "many" incels you have rated? Was the data randomly selected? Data on its own is not enough to draw inferences about a population unless it is statistically significant and was sampled without bias. It's just data. Being able to determine that the data is likely to not be representative of the population is a valid pre-analysis approach - which is what I am doing. Bad data leads to bad extrapolations.

I did rate like 30 ppl which was like 2% of the userbase at one point. On top of that there was the ratings megathread which also supported my claim.

 

[blickpall]

I did rate like 30 ppl which was like 2% of the userbase at one point. On top of that there was the ratings megathread which also supported my claim.

2% is actually a great sample size, I'll admit that. But again, if your method of gathering data is biased, you can't draw conclusions from it. Both the ratings megathread and your personal gathering of ratings is akin to the slam dunk contest. This is the same reason why a lot of psychological studies are running into reproducibility issues, because they used college students. Higher median family income and education, ages 18-22, disproportionate representation of certain minorities, offering extra credit incentives, etc. are all selection biases. For you, the selection biases are that they are members of this site with no provable way to determine whether they are incel in the first place, they are willing to send photos and be rated (or to post them publicly), I am going to venture a guess that they are English-speaking and not representative of population racial distribution, they own either a camera+computer, webcam laptop, or smartphone, and you have a subjective rater bias. This all amounts to your assessment of 30 individuals to be non-indicative of just about anything beyond the fact that people who fit all of the above criteria are in your opinion more attractive than they should be.