I read an argument:
"Although JBs bodies are mature enough for them to be fertile*, they are still too immature to make decisions about sex".
1. How many false rape accusations from women over 18 are coming to light now? So many men have had their lives ruined by false rape accusations now that the govt is at least having to pretend to be taking notice.
So it appears that women OVER THE AGE 18 ALSO are not mature enough to handle the responsibility of sex.
As you know, if a woman drinks booze then drives a car, she is (somewhat) responsible for her actions, but if she drinks booze then jumps into bed with a man, then the man is a rapist because we don't think that the woman is responsible enough. We (society) infantalize women even when they're over the age of 18.
Women are children no matter what. Whiteknights want to mollycoddle women no matter their age. When cucks and whiteknights say that JB are children, they forget that women over 18 are too.
2. Another point: if women under a certain age are too mentally immature to handle the responsibility of sex, then they should be too immature to handle it from chads their age too. So it's not the sex that's damaging to them, it's who is gaining access to it. As I state a lot around here, we are a gynocentric species and we hate men having access to sex, especially if they are ugly, old, or seen as low status. We frown upon ugly, old or low status men's sexual relief in the form of porn, prostitutes, sexbots, etc.
MILFs are hot, but older men who like younger women are "creepy", "advantage-takers", "pathetic".
Even when a woman is above the AoC and an older man lusts after her, it is still seen as creepy. It's legal but STILL creepy. We inherently hate the idea of a man gaining some sort of sexual gratification...no, having an attraction AT ALL to a younger, prime woman. It makes us uncomfortable. It doesn't sit well with us. The age of women he finds attractive should go up on every one of his birthdays and should not be tied to female fertility, youth, health characteristics, etc.
We hate male sexuality. This is why we hate gay men, by and large: because gay men don't have to bow at the alter of womandom. Gay men can get sex without crawling through the catflap of female hypergamy. They are free and we hate it. How dare they.
3. Why do women in California reach sexual maturity 365 days before they do in Ireland? Do Irish teen girls eat a diet that speeds up their maturity? Or is the age of consent arbitrary and not really based off anything concrete? What concrete thing makes Calif teen girls and Irish teen girls so different?
This thread isn't pro child-abuse before that accusation gets thrown in.
_________
* Meaning that God/biology/fertility is wrong or at least out of step with western AoC laws, etc
"Although JBs bodies are mature enough for them to be fertile*, they are still too immature to make decisions about sex".
1. How many false rape accusations from women over 18 are coming to light now? So many men have had their lives ruined by false rape accusations now that the govt is at least having to pretend to be taking notice.
Lesbian fantasist invented 15 rapes and sexual assaults which saw man jailed to get sympathy from girlfriends, court hears
A fantasist who invented rape and sexual assault allegations against 15 men to get attention from her girlfriend has been jailed for ten years.
So it appears that women OVER THE AGE 18 ALSO are not mature enough to handle the responsibility of sex.
As you know, if a woman drinks booze then drives a car, she is (somewhat) responsible for her actions, but if she drinks booze then jumps into bed with a man, then the man is a rapist because we don't think that the woman is responsible enough. We (society) infantalize women even when they're over the age of 18.
Women are children no matter what. Whiteknights want to mollycoddle women no matter their age. When cucks and whiteknights say that JB are children, they forget that women over 18 are too.
2. Another point: if women under a certain age are too mentally immature to handle the responsibility of sex, then they should be too immature to handle it from chads their age too. So it's not the sex that's damaging to them, it's who is gaining access to it. As I state a lot around here, we are a gynocentric species and we hate men having access to sex, especially if they are ugly, old, or seen as low status. We frown upon ugly, old or low status men's sexual relief in the form of porn, prostitutes, sexbots, etc.
MILFs are hot, but older men who like younger women are "creepy", "advantage-takers", "pathetic".
Even when a woman is above the AoC and an older man lusts after her, it is still seen as creepy. It's legal but STILL creepy. We inherently hate the idea of a man gaining some sort of sexual gratification...no, having an attraction AT ALL to a younger, prime woman. It makes us uncomfortable. It doesn't sit well with us. The age of women he finds attractive should go up on every one of his birthdays and should not be tied to female fertility, youth, health characteristics, etc.
We hate male sexuality. This is why we hate gay men, by and large: because gay men don't have to bow at the alter of womandom. Gay men can get sex without crawling through the catflap of female hypergamy. They are free and we hate it. How dare they.
3. Why do women in California reach sexual maturity 365 days before they do in Ireland? Do Irish teen girls eat a diet that speeds up their maturity? Or is the age of consent arbitrary and not really based off anything concrete? What concrete thing makes Calif teen girls and Irish teen girls so different?
This thread isn't pro child-abuse before that accusation gets thrown in.
_________
* Meaning that God/biology/fertility is wrong or at least out of step with western AoC laws, etc
