Based Anthropologist agrees, that monogamy is the backbone of economic prosperity

[Gyros_Pretcel]

There seems to be a newer article in German with a bigger focus on the monogamy aspect, but it is paywalled:

Monogamie: "Polygamie geht in modernen Gesellschaften nicht gut"

Der US-Anthropologe Joseph Henrich hält Monogamie für kulturell verankert und mit großen Vorteilen verbunden. Doch wie viel Einmischung ins Private verträgt der Mensch?

www.zeit.de

 

[Deleted member 18214]

Monogamy is the only way to keep the wagecuck army busy ngl

 

[ThirdWorldcel]

Monogamy used to work when economical success translated to social and sexual success.

Nowadays, you have STEMcels ending the week in an empty apartment while you've thugs, drug dealers and similar ones with a great social circle and multiple sexual partners.

 

[Deleted member 19236]

Monogamy used to work when economical success translated to social and sexual success.

Nowadays, you have STEMcels ending the week in an empty apartment while you've thugs, drug dealers and similar ones with a great social circle and multiple sexual partners.

 

[BlkPillPres]

Monogamy used to work when economical success translated to social and sexual success.

Nowadays, you have STEMcels ending the week in an empty apartment while you've thugs, drug dealers and similar ones with a great social circle and multiple sexual partners.

This, that anthropologist is just spewing some red pilled BS and not taking it to its logical and final conclusion - "the backbone of economic prosperity is female submission"

Men can't have true economic success of the women they chase after can also work and own property, especially through divorce, so long as women have the same rights as men, you can never have a stable society

If a woman isn't dependant on the resources of a specific man, why wouldn't she just fuck a random thug tyrone or chad, she can get the government to raise her bastard children via our tax dollars or find some desperate beta to provide for her, without control over women, there's no incentive for them to "play fair" and help create a balanced society

 

[AlexanderTheGreat11]

Monogamy used to work when economical success translated to social and sexual success.

Nowadays, you have STEMcels ending the week in an empty apartment while you've thugs, drug dealers and similar ones with a great social circle and multiple sexual partners.

This

 

[based_meme]

Monogamy used to work when economical success translated to social and sexual success.

Nowadays, you have STEMcels ending the week in an empty apartment while you've thugs, drug dealers and similar ones with a great social circle and multiple sexual partners.

This, that anthropologist is just spewing some red pilled BS and not taking it to its logical and final conclusion - "the backbone of economic prosperity is female submission"

Men can't have true economic success of the women they chase after can also work and own property, especially through divorce, so long as women have the same rights as men, you can never have a stable society

Karl Popper IQ.

 

[ThirdWorldcel]

This, that anthropologist is just spewing some red pilled BS and not taking it to its logical and final conclusion - "the backbone of economic prosperity is female submission"

Men can't have true economic success of the women they chase after can also work and own property, especially through divorce, so long as women have the same rights as men, you can never have a stable society

If a woman isn't dependant on the resources of a specific man, why wouldn't she just fuck a random thug tyrone or chad, she can get the government to raise her bastard children via our tax dollars or find some desperate beta to provide for her, without control over women, there's no incentive for them to "play fair" and help create a balanced society

Based, economical success in a declining economy where prosperity opportunites for men are shrinking while more and more women are being openly honest about their preference for criminals and dark triad men is simply conjeture.

A 25 year old guy who's about to get a PhD has little to no sexual experience regardless of his economical position and academical achievement while a 25 year old drug dealer who dropped out from high school lost his virginity at 15 and got multiple sexual partners and a supportive community.

 

[Gyros_Pretcel]

This, that anthropologist is just spewing some red pilled BS and not taking it to its logical and final conclusion - "the backbone of economic prosperity is female submission"

Men can't have true economic success of the women they chase after can also work and own property, especially through divorce, so long as women have the same rights as men, you can never have a stable society

If a woman isn't dependant on the resources of a specific man, why wouldn't she just fuck a random thug tyrone or chad, she can get the government to raise her bastard children via our tax dollars or find some desperate beta to provide for her, without control over women, there's no incentive for them to "play fair" and help create a balanced society

Doubt, that he would get a platform with further reaching positions. One step at a time. At least this is another point for our side so far and highlights the problem somewhat, while showing what the ideal society should look like in outcome. The measures for achieving this are a whole nother book. Imo a compromise would be best. We try to improve incels, but in exchange they have to adhere to this beneficial groundwork system.

 

[ThirdWorldcel]

Doubt, that he would get a platform with further reaching positions. One step at a time. At least this is another point for our side so far and highlights the problem somewhat, while showing what the ideal society should look like in outcome. The measures for achieving this are a whole nother book. Imo a compromise would be best. We try to improve incels, but in exchange they have to adhere to this beneficial groundwork system.

Society has vastly declined in the nest 10-15 years, men are dropping out of education and the workforce at alarming rates, the damage is already done.

According to proggressive and feminist thinking all men are privileged mysoginists who fuck models each week, we're treated like monsters, not people. You cannot make a deal with a monster.

 

[Gyros_Pretcel]

According to proggressive and feminist thinking all men are privileged mysoginists who fuck models each week, we're treated like monsters, not people. You cannot make a deal with a monster.

You are exaggerating. This is the same type of rhetoric, that made mainstream feminism what it is today.

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

dude that shit is 50 min, cliffs?

 

[Deleted member 22907]

Monogamy used to work when economical success translated to social and sexual success.

Nowadays, you have STEMcels ending the week in an empty apartment while you've thugs, drug dealers and similar ones with a great social circle and multiple sexual partners.

i hate modern society

 

[Gyros_Pretcel]

dude that shit is 50 min, cliffs?

This observation came up multiple times on the forum.

His research areas include: cultural learning, the evolution of cooperation, social stratification, prestige and the evolution of economic decision-making and religious beliefs. He advocates the idea that polygamy is harmful for society[4] because monogamy reduces male-male competition. Henrich's research shows that in psychological testing people with a Western, educated, industrialized, rich, democratic background - the WEIRD people - are not representative of humans in general in many psychological tests.[5]

Source:

Joseph Henrich - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

Source:

Joseph Henrich - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

how about 5 timestamps of the best moments in the vid?

 

[Deleted member 24529]

Monogamy used to work when economical success translated to social and sexual success.

Nowadays, you have STEMcels ending the week in an empty apartment while you've thugs, drug dealers and similar ones with a great social circle and multiple sexual partners.

Yeah but the siciety will finally run out of STEMcels and will be left with double digit iq barbarians. Literally a reset for the entire mankind. Oh wait I forgot that this is necessary for the nwo.

 

[Gyros_Pretcel]

how about 5 timestamps of the best moments in the vid?

I read a german article, but the video is about the same book. To much polygamy = winner takes it all = other men don't contribute = economic stagnation.

 

[BlkPillPres]

You are exaggerating. This is the same type of rhetoric, that made mainstream feminism what it is today.

@ThirdWorldcel is not exaggerating on the "You cannot make a deal with a monster" part though

I get confused whenever I see statements like this:

One step at a time

As if there is a formal and "proper" way to discuss taking away women's rights

"Baby steps dude, we'll get there"

JFL no, we won't, it will never be discussed ever, it will have to be forced into existence after an economic collapse or it will never happen, society will never civilly discuss taking away women's rights "for the greater good" seeing as at least 50% of said society is biased against that option from the get go

 

[grondilu]

This, that anthropologist is just spewing some red pilled BS and not taking it to its logical and final conclusion - "the backbone of economic prosperity is female submission"

Based and blackpilled.

 

[SMPcel]

Monogamy used to work when economical success translated to social and sexual success.

Nowadays, you have STEMcels ending the week in an empty apartment while you've thugs, drug dealers and similar ones with a great social circle and multiple sexual partners.

 

[BenBerger]

This, that anthropologist is just spewing some red pilled BS and not taking it to its logical and final conclusion - "the backbone of economic prosperity is female submission"

Men can't have true economic success of the women they chase after can also work and own property, especially through divorce, so long as women have the same rights as men, you can never have a stable society

If a woman isn't dependant on the resources of a specific man, why wouldn't she just fuck a random thug tyrone or chad, she can get the government to raise her bastard children via our tax dollars or find some desperate beta to provide for her, without control over women, there's no incentive for them to "play fair" and help create a balanced society

High economic IQ
Sounds like a good piece of work. Hope it will be translated to english.

 

[Deleted member 21883]

We are poor because modern people are too high inhib. That's why joe smoe years ago had a nice house and a family for passing high school and being able to use a screwdriver while you now have a bachelor's degree and are living with your parents while shelving dogfood for a lifetime of inceldom.

 

[truthpill]

If a woman isn't dependant on the resources of a specific man, why wouldn't she just fuck a random thug tyrone or chad, she can get the government to raise her bastard children via our tax dollars or find some desperate beta to provide for her, without control over women, there's no incentive for them to "play fair" and help create a balanced society

Everything you say is High IQ, my respects.

 

[ThirdWorldcel]

You are exaggerating. This is the same type of rhetoric, that made mainstream feminism what it is today.

Even if you wanna use another term, it all boils down to the same thing. Men being ultra-privileged beings that systemically affect all women in all kinds of human activity.

The only thing that's left for us is "deconstructing" our masculinity and becoming a "feminist ally", creating this image of the evil patriarch which the revolutionary feminists have to fight to death it's pretty common in most radical ideologies, just like the organizing of communism was hating the evil bourgueis

 

[Ricecel X]

Monogamy used to work when economical success translated to social and sexual success.

Nowadays, you have STEMcels ending the week in an empty apartment while you've thugs, drug dealers and similar ones with a great social circle and multiple sexual partners.

I am that STEMcel who goes home to coom alone in my room.

Michel Houellebecq had a great quote about this.

It's a fact...that in societies like ours sex truly represents a second system of differentiation, completely independent of money; and as a system of differentiation it functions just as mercilessly. The effects of these two systems are, furthermore, strictly equivalent. Just like unrestrained economic liberalism, and for similar reasons, sexual liberalism produces phenomena of absolute pauperization . Some men make love every day; others five or six times in their life, or never. Some make love with dozens of women; others with none. It's what's known as 'the law of the market'...Economic liberalism is an extension of the domain of the struggle, its extension to all ages and all classes of society. Sexual liberalism is likewise an extension of the domain of the struggle, its extension to all ages and all classes of society.

 

[Deleted member 4159]

This, that anthropologist is just spewing some red pilled BS and not taking it to its logical and final conclusion - "the backbone of economic prosperity is female submission"

Men can't have true economic success of the women they chase after can also work and own property, especially through divorce, so long as women have the same rights as men, you can never have a stable society

It's the same reason why women having rights will never work. People think that judges will enact the law fairly, without realizing the inborn bias that men have to protect women. Democracy is a meme.

 

[Mountainbikecel]

she can get the government to raise her bastard children via our tax dollars or find some desperate beta to provide for her, without control over women, there's no incentive for them to "play fair" and help create a balanced society