Anthropologically, men are superior to women on all levels. Take the patriarchal creationist pill and reject the matriarchal Darwinist pill.

[Hitler of nazareth]

Historically, sexual selection was exercised by men. They were the ones with the strength, vitality, and power. A woman possessed neither the physical condition nor the mental fortitude to survive on her own in the hostile environment in which homo sapiens emerged. Either she joined a male, anthropologically superior to her, or she was prey to mass rape and wild beasts of the forest. It was the woman who constantly wanted to bond with a man to ensure her well-being and that of her offspring. In that scenario, the Jewish capitalist hypergamy that we see today was not even 0.1% of what it is today, the woman had an uncontrollable drive for cock, and to satisfy it.

It was patriarchy, religion and the male desire to sire young women that made mankind genetically prosper.

The "blackpill" phenomenon, where women select "genetically" fit men, is only a consequence of the excessive technological advance of the last century, where strong and virile arms were replaced by mechanical levers, so that women do not need men. We should never have given such ability to women.

If capitalism and the Jews did not conspire against us, we would still have access to fresh, young, virgin pussy.

 

[Mortis]

Unfortunately, the jews did a number on basic natrual social structures.

People forget we got kiked out of a good life, and blame foids too much.

 

[Mortis]

If capitalism and the Jews did not conspire against us, we would still have access to fresh, young, virgin pussy.

 

[Cryotron]

we would still have access to fresh, young, virgin pussy.

more like access to women at all, we can't even get average 40 y.o

 

[IncelusRex]

If you mean private ownership of production and property by "capitalism", than it is not the cause of our problems. Actually the lack of it is my greatest problem.
If you mean capitalizing by "capitalism" where you use the given situation(or create one) for your own benefit, such as pushing feminism for more taxes/votes/manpower etc., than it is one of the causes of our problems. But it could also potentially be the fix for our problems.

Anyways I think NatSoc can only work with educated and homogeneous citizens.

 

[IncelCream]

Are black men superior to white women?

 

[IncelCream]

more like access to women at all, we can't even get average 40 y.o

Cope, virgin women in Harams with Chads 200 years ago while young incel fight and die

 

[IncelusRex]

Are black men superior to white women?

Of course not but if you compare the average individual of each group in a case by case basis, blacks will be superior to them in some cases like physical strength and speed.

It is like asking whether an extremely fast cheap car is superior to a Rolls-Royce. It may be faster but the Rolls-Royce is definitely superior.

 

[IncelusRex]

Of course not but if you compare the average individual of each group in a case by case basis, blacks will be superior to them in some cases like physical strength and speed.

It is like asking whether an extremely fast cheap car is superior to a Rolls-Royce. It may be faster but the Rolls-Royce is definitely superior.

So it really depends what purpose do you appoint to them. Of course black man will be superior to white woman if you are gathering a legion. But again your legion might not even desire physical attributes like speed and strength like it used to be. So your question lacks context. It can't be answered precisely without more information.

 

[Friezacel]

Woman always were and always will be the gatekeepers of sex and only the fittest survive. Unfortuntately Darwin was right

 

[coping_manlet]

Are black men superior to white women?

No, black men aren’t homo sapien. They are in the homo genus but not truly part of the human species. Like comparing white women to Neanderthal men

 

[IncelusRex]

No, black men aren’t homo sapien. They are in the homo genus but not truly part of the human species. Like comparing white women to Neanderthal men

Or comparing an automobile to a horse carriage

 

[glowIntheDark]

sexual selection was exercised by men.

Meh not really if you map out all 8 billion DNA of current population you would find that 1 man got to mate for every 17 women. i.e- for every one man there were 16 men who could not mate. Now that wouldn't make sense if men were sexual selectors. Women were always the sexual gatekeeper.

They were the ones with the strength, vitality, and power.

Because those were the MEN women preferred mating with.

The very first humans (apes whatever) were not very dimorphic meaning males n females were indistinguishable but it did not remain that way because the females of the tribe were not mating with men that did not have the "correct" gene to pass on-
Women SUBCONSCIOUSLY chose -

Taller men/Broad shoulders/defined jaw/positive canthal tilt because in the caveman days those were the man with the highest chance of survival hence assuring the survival of her offspring

. In that scenario, the Jewish capitalist hypergamy that we see today was not even 0.1%

Again u r factually wrong . 17 women mated for every 1 man.

was patriarchy, religion and the male desire to sire young women that made mankind genetically prosper

Other way round really. It was women's selection of certain genes on a mass level not as individuals that drove force to civilizations.

Ancient argarian societies were egalitarian .

Labour based /feudal civilizations gave way to patriarchy.

Labour based feudal civilizations gave way to Industrial Revolution

Industrial revolution gave way to current egalitarian societies

 

[Don Vito]

more like access to women at all, we can't even get average 40 y.o

 

[Glerforpus]

patriarchy worked with farming and hands on work. With not much heavy work needed to survive plus more rights for women, patriarchy doesn’t really make sense. Especially to normies

 

[Freixel]

It is unnatural that it is women who are above men in the social pyramid, hence the massive psychological suffering that affects this society.

Everything is turned upside down

 

[glassescel]

Meh not really if you map out all 8 billion DNA of current population you would find that 1 man got to mate for every 17 women. i.e- for every one man there were 16 men who could not mate. Now that wouldn't make sense if men were sexual selectors. Women were always the sexual gatekeeper.



Because those were the MEN women preferred mating with.

The very first humans (apes whatever) were not very dimorphic meaning males n females were indistinguishable but it did not remain that way because the females of the tribe were not mating with men that did not have the "correct" gene to pass on-
Women SUBCONSCIOUSLY chose -

Taller men/Broad shoulders/defined jaw/positive canthal tilt because in the caveman days those were the man with the highest chance of survival hence assuring the survival of her offspring



Again u r factually wrong . 17 women mated for every 1 man.

Other way round really. It was women's selection of certain genes on a mass level not as individuals that drove force to civilizations.

Ancient argarian societies were egalitarian .

Labour based /feudal civilizations gave way to patriarchy.

Labour based feudal civilizations gave way to Industrial Revolution

Industrial revolution gave way to current egalitarian societies

 

[Gott _mit _uns94]

Man build societys, while w0men know only how to consume and destroy.

 

[Antorian]

Male authority over females is natural and leads to propserity and civilization.
Female freedom and equality leads to degeneracy and barbarism.

Women didn't select men in the past, they were selected for them by her parents/brothers.