because every country wishes to aggressively expand their culture and ideas to other countries, and because of that there would always be ethnic groups that would become vulnerable to erasure or occupation
as they should
Like who?
You are right that's what colonialism and American imperialism is.
This is the most retarded race bait I've ever seen almost every kid does that
gypsys, albanians, moldavians, and many more
La creatura americana
The only issue is that stupid cucks feel sympathy when this happens.
When you take over a nation, fucking kill people and don't look back.
Stop saving deathnics who are flawed by genetic.
When you take over a nation, fucking kill people and don't look back.
Stop saving deathnics who are flawed by genetic.
Christmaxxing subhuman
And how the Bible ends?
Do I need to explain to you why you are wrong?
It's one of those things where it's ideologically rooted in. So it would be very hard to convince you otherwise.
Please explain.
But the nation can resist some kind of replacement. Ethnonationalists in the context of Europe just want their countries to remain European. Northeast Asia is largely Northeast Asian, Sub-Saharan Africa is largely Sub-Saharan African, the Semites predominate in the Middle East, Southeast Asia is largely Southeast Asian, Aborigines have their homeland in Australia, and so do the native peoples that inhabit the Americas. Why should Europe be forced to embrace multiculturalism when it hurts Europeans so badly? This is not fair. Europeans have a right to exist.
ill respond anyway
europeans always did have the right to exist, but then they supported the bombing of middle eastern countries. the european countries then spreaded their values to the middle east. now those middle easteners, with very conservative values and high reproduction rates, are migrating to europe and taking revenge. dont want it to happen? then dont side with anyone during wars
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
