Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill And yet "We don't go for Tera-Chads. We prefer sweet average guys"

Bangkok or bust

Bangkok or bust

A life of poorer quality due to skull & bones
-
Joined
Mar 22, 2018
Posts
4,177
P2kY3dy.png


The relationship between the looks rating of the member who posted a profile and the number of first-contact e-mails received is shown in Figure 5.2. Outcomes are strongly increasing in measured looks. In fact, the looks ratings variable has the strongest impact on outcomes among all variables used in the Poisson regression analysis. Men and women in the lowest decile receive only about half as many e-mails as members whose rating is in the fourth decile, while the users in the top decile are contacted about twice as often. Overall, the relationship between outcomes and looks is similar for men and women. However, there is a surprising “superstar effect” for men. Men in the top five percent of ratings receive almost twice as many first contacts as the next five percent; for women, on the other hand, the analogous difference in outcomes is much smaller.

 
Holes are so silly
 
Holes are so silly
Not silly, disingenuous. The truth seems to be a very fluid thing to women, if it's a good idea to say something they will often make themselves believe it as well. Why wouldn't they? If they were only attracted to 8+ males they would be "shallow", and that wouldn't be the right thing to do, would it?
 
Males and females both care for looks, but males less so. Males care about a woman's personality and how much in commonn they have wjth her
 
Not silly, disingenuous. The truth seems to be a very fluid thing to women, if it's a good idea to say something they will often make themselves believe it as well. Why wouldn't they? If they were only attracted to 8+ males they would be "shallow", and that wouldn't be the right thing to do, would it?
Silly because they think that we would believe them.
 
A 10/10 females receive as many emails as 8/10 males but there is wide gap between 10/10 males and 10/10 females. So, no doubt, foids are way more lookist.
 
Foids should be nailed to a cross in public and used as cumdumpsters
 
P2kY3dy.png


The relationship between the looks rating of the member who posted a profile and the number of first-contact e-mails received is shown in Figure 5.2. Outcomes are strongly increasing in measured looks. In fact, the looks ratings variable has the strongest impact on outcomes among all variables used in the Poisson regression analysis. Men and women in the lowest decile receive only about half as many e-mails as members whose rating is in the fourth decile, while the users in the top decile are contacted about twice as often. Overall, the relationship between outcomes and looks is similar for men and women. However, there is a surprising “superstar effect” for men. Men in the top five percent of ratings receive almost twice as many first contacts as the next five percent; for women, on the other hand, the analogous difference in outcomes is much smaller.


This is from 2006, it's much worse now.

This is from 2014 OkCupid book Dataclysm:

we4x6wz6he821.png


(Forum software won't let me delete the attachment on mobile)
 

Attachments

  • we4x6wz6he821.png
    we4x6wz6he821.png
    16.2 KB · Views: 6
A 10/10 females receive as many emails as 8/10 males but there is wide gap between 10/10 males and 10/10 females. So, no doubt, foids are way more lookist.

You horrid inkwheel. No wonder you fail with women with that attitude.
 
Males and females both care for looks, but males less so. Males care about a woman's personality and how much in commonn they have wjth her
Males care mostly about personality, looks for us consist of mainly 2 things: dont be a landwhale and dont look absolutely horrible.
 
Males care mostly about personality, looks for us consist of mainly 2 things: dont be a landwhale and dont look absolutely horrible.

Men seem to be able to appreciate a greater diversity of beauty among women, they don't even have a type most of the time. Meanwhile women do, and it's always the same one phenotype.
 
Men seem to be able to appreciate a greater diversity of beauty among women, they don't even have a type most of the times. Meanwhile women do, and it's always the same one phenotype.
Always the same muscular, massive jaw thugs, fucking Cum Receptacles™
 
A 10/10 male gets twice as much mail as a 8/10 or 9/10 male.
This is what the incel community has been saying. The top 5% of men are getting most the attention, the top 20%, almost all, and the rest very little. On top of that, society is actively putting down men in the bottom 80%. We are being filtered via ruthless economies (winner take all), as well as higher education (where foids and Chads are actively promoted, while lower-tier men are suppressed).
 
80-20 rule is dead it’s the 95-5 rule now. This graphic is so telling.
 

Similar threads

Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
13
Views
987
Plggy20144
Plggy20144
Stupid Clown
Replies
18
Views
585
turbosperg
turbosperg
YouArentBlackPilled
Replies
96
Views
6K
zionpill
zionpill

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top