B
based_meme
I.N.C.E.L. High Command, Psychological Operations
★★★★★
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2019
- Posts
- 31,466
I've been thinking a lot about inceldom, and I've realized that inceldom itself, as it manifests in society, is an unsolved (or potentially unsolvable) problem. There are a lot of unsolved problems in philosophy and maths (some believed to be unsolvable), and I believe that inceldom is an unsolved problem in sociology that's rooted in biology. In evolutionary terms incels are genetic invalids - the genetic rejects. Every species has them. It's arguable that every species needs incels in order to evolve, since genetic recombination is mostly random, which means that you're going to have a clustering of bad genes (or enough bad genes) that signals to others that this biological unit has them and shouldn't pass them on. Incels are nature's way of signaling to everybody "don't pass on these genes; stay away."
We all know that hypergamy is the result of evolutionary programming that ruthlessly selects for the best available genes in a male. If we were to suppose that enough generations of hyperactive hypergamy has been practiced on the human population, we could reasonably assume that the normal distribution of attractiveness will shift to the right. This, of course, means that what used to be normie tier will eventually be truecel tier and what used to be chadlite will be normie. Hypergamy (ruthless sexual selection by females) will remain, since that is hard-coded near the very bottom (there's no indication that it's strictly a human trait). This means that at any given stage of human evolution, hypergamy will undoubtedly exist, which, in turn, means that any society, no matter how advanced, will always have some percentage of the male population that will be genetic invalids.
The result of this is the depressing conclusion that incels will always exist in any given society and that no amount of social or political engineering will solve the problem. The only theoretical solution is a genetic re-engineering of the entire human race.
We all know that hypergamy is the result of evolutionary programming that ruthlessly selects for the best available genes in a male. If we were to suppose that enough generations of hyperactive hypergamy has been practiced on the human population, we could reasonably assume that the normal distribution of attractiveness will shift to the right. This, of course, means that what used to be normie tier will eventually be truecel tier and what used to be chadlite will be normie. Hypergamy (ruthless sexual selection by females) will remain, since that is hard-coded near the very bottom (there's no indication that it's strictly a human trait). This means that at any given stage of human evolution, hypergamy will undoubtedly exist, which, in turn, means that any society, no matter how advanced, will always have some percentage of the male population that will be genetic invalids.
The result of this is the depressing conclusion that incels will always exist in any given society and that no amount of social or political engineering will solve the problem. The only theoretical solution is a genetic re-engineering of the entire human race.