An open question to whites against race mixing

[Deleted member 8353]

Well I find this concept to be perpetuating the very philosophy and systems which has lead to the current cultures and systems which has created Incels and general discord and unhappiness. It seems to be very anti human and immoral.

I think that the unhappiness is caused by the egoism present in our society, normies will scorn what I'm proposing.

Please enlighten me on how these verses can be twisted to be anti marriage and sex.

The grain is spirit, the fruit is children, and only those who hate their life in this world will see the kingdom of heaven. If you abstain from the world only then will you see the kingdom of the father, and that includes abstaining from desires of the flesh. "He who loves his life loses it", that is referring to the futility of our earthly, material existence. All your pursuits here will fall to nothing.

I wouldn't call it twisted.

 

[averageblokecel]

Wow (((fontaine))) at it yet again, has Soros raised the salary?

 

[monkeyman]

Endogamy is a matter of convenience, not principle. See the following sources for proof:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strom_Thurmond

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/hist...s-had-tend-to-german-prisoners-war-180969069/

In the absence of judgement almost all men would have no strings attached interracial sex if given the opportunity, due to the scarcity of sex.

 

[EthnicelNL]

My sister has set up this exact situation; she's with a guy who has agreed to a "polyamorous" relationship even though she's the only girl he sleeps with, while she is constantly on the hunt for more alpha guys to get banged out by. Sometimes she leaves him, and then gets dumped by those alphas and comes back to him. Meanwhile he pays for her credit card bills that she runs up, even when they're not together.

Your sister is a stupid whore who needs to die. That cuck needs to be tortured to death.

 

[BrendioEEE]

I think that the unhappiness is caused by the egoism present in our society, normies will scorn what I'm proposing.

What you're proposing leads to more selfishness and instant gratification. More Egoism. Whether you want humanity to die because you don't care in some Nihilistic fashion, or you do in some really twisted one it the result is the same, it will lead to people constantly not caring about anything more than themselves and just lead to humanity dying in a selfish, self gratifying, wimper and the only people who might get fooled into this philosophy are probably going to be mostly whites. The Ashkenazi Jews wont fall for it, I doubt many third worlders will fall for it, its just a white coated blackpill with a nihilistic core.

The grain is spirit, the fruit is children, and only those who hate their life in this world will see the kingdom of heaven. If you abstain from the world only then will you see the kingdom of the father, and that includes abstaining from desires of the flesh. "He who loves his life loses it", that is referring to the futility of our earthly, material existence. All your pursuits here will fall to nothing.

I wouldn't call it twisted.

Even with the grain meaning the spirit, and the fruit meaning children, you're stretching the meaning of these verses way too much. I just don't see it. Most of the bible isn't complex riddles and parables. There are plenty of parables and examples in the new testament but I feel like its very common to take much more out of it than is actually especially when there's plenty of other verses that say the opposite of what people try and twist it to be. For example you say, "only those who hate their life in this world will see the kingdom of heaven". Only those? Where does it say that? "If you abstain from the world only then will you see the kingdom of the father, and that includes abstaining from desires of the flesh." Again, how do you get this out of this? This doesn't add it, it seems like you're trying to project your own worldview into these verses.

He should have quoted 1 Corinthians 7; that's much more on point. But that chapter is full of caveats because Paul is trying to avoid giving people the idea that God is commanding them to remain celibate. See also 1 Timothy 4, which says that that it's false doctrine to forbid people from marrying.

1 Corinthians 7 fits what i'm saying even more. I suggest you read this over https://www.biblestudytools.com/nas/1-corinthians/7.html its basically saying it is immoral to have sex or touch another woman if you are not married to that woman, and if you are NOT married you should remain celibate. Basically as the trend the bible and has it always has preached, sex before marriage is bad. This does not say SEX itself is bad, it does not even discourage Marriage, and the trend in the bible seems to preach the opposite.

As for 1 Timothy 4 https://www.biblestudytools.com/nas/1-timothy/4.html it seems to be BTFOing MGTOWcels who say Marriage is evil and you shouldn't get married. Am I missing something here? I mean I only studied Abrahamic Religions for about 16 years, what do I know.

 

[jackgalt]

Because the beauty of the White Aryan woman must not perish from the earth.

 

[Deleted member 8353]

it will lead to people constantly not caring about anything more than themselves and just lead to humanity dying in a selfish, self gratifying, wimper and the only people who might get fooled into this philosophy are probably going to be mostly whites. The Ashkenazi Jews wont fall for it, I doubt many third worlders will fall for it, its just a white coated blackpill with a nihilistic core.

Selfish? I think it's the opposite. What's selfish is to procreate out of some sort of misplaced need to expand or propagate your own race or genetic lineage. You can't suffer from your own nonexistence, and procreating to fullfill your own biological urges or to better a society that only needs to exist to support our own descendants, it's just self serving and completely pointless.

You're probably right most won't listen, but the only people their harming is themselves and their children. Like I said before though, I'm not trying to convince you.

Even with the grain meaning the spirit, and the fruit meaning children, you're stretching the meaning of these verses way too much. I just don't see it. Most of the bible isn't complex riddles and parables. There are plenty of parables and examples in the new testament but I feel like its very common to take much more out of it than is actually especially when there's plenty of other verses that say the opposite of what people try and twist it to be. For example you say, "only those who hate their life in this world will see the kingdom of heaven". Only those? Where does it say that? "If you abstain from the world only then will you see the kingdom of the father, and that includes abstaining from desires of the flesh." Again, how do you get this out of this? This doesn't add it, it seems like you're trying to project your own worldview into these verses.

I don't think much of The New Testament is literal, so I suppose that's where we disagree.

 

[Evildoer]

We're all somewhat mixed as is and we all came from africa. Features that we associate with "whiteness" didn't exist 10,000 years ago and were a response to climate. One man's lack of melanin makes him no more special than another's epicanthic fold. This has all been proven but stormcels are much like creationists in that they completely deny modern day science that doesn't support their worldview.

You're right at first point, but the thing is: there's no racial studies these days, that topic went completely abandoned, once lefties came to power. They don't want to hear about any possible differences (although they are visible with naked eye) so they blocked every race-related studies. Stormcels are pathetic, but much less of an evil, than lefties.

 

[BrendioEEE]

I don't think much of The New Testament is literal, so I suppose that's where we disagree.

I wasn't saying all of its literal, especially in the context of parables, just that you're clearly taking too much out of this parable/explanation that clearly isn't there.

There's nothing more pathetic and beta than being that worried about other people's sex lives. People want to fuck/date/marry others who's recent ancestors come from a different continent, who cares?

People who care about the genetic ramifications this might have on the children. Genes have been evolving in very specific ecosystems, for very specific weather patterns, cultures, sexual markets, disease resistances, etc for thousands of years. When you tamper with that you only cause problems for your children that they wouldn't otherwise have.

We're all somewhat mixed as is and we all came from africa. Features that we associate with "whiteness" didn't exist 10,000 years ago and were a response to climate. One man's lack of melanin makes him no more special than another's epicanthic fold. This has all been proven but stormcels are much like creationists in that they completely deny modern day science that doesn't support their worldview.

Highly debatable. There's this notion in some scientific spheres of African Origins, there's really no concrete way of verifying this, this is just an assumption. One that makes little to no sense especially considering how people who the most genetically similar to the Africans of 10,000 years ago can barely make anything better than huts, yet some historians estimate advanced structures being found 10,000 years ago. Basically unless you can prove without a shadow of a doubt we came from Africans, i'm not buying it. So no it, hasn't been proven, unless you're 10 thousand years old and know something we don't, oh wait you're just appealing to authority because "someone else figured it out" even tho you have no idea what you're actually talking about. Genetic differences are also a lot more than melanin. Differences in genetic makeup determine testosterone, estrogen, and IQ averages. Which are the makeup for averages in personality differences. There's a lot more at factor than just these 3 but they're the big one. Its why women with high IQs can still act fucking terrible because of their estrogen levels, or why a combination of low IQ and high testosterone causes Africans to be more violent on average.

Even so in saying all this I don't support any sort of "replacement"; I just don't think there will actually be any "replacement" any time soon despite many leftist fantasies and I'm not stupid enough to mindlessly hate someone just because their recent ancestors came from a different continent than mine. I do hate most people in general though.

Well at the rate whites are currently not having any children, it could easily happen in a generation or two.

Because of the massive amount of aid and support we send to third world countries their populations are rising at a rate never before seen.

There are people who are getting food, and aid without working for it for a generation if this trend keeps happening till 2100 They will almost outbreed us all. Now you may be wondering why this is a bad thing if it happens outside of our countries, well because its not just happening outside of our countries. Firstly these are the people we import, the people who have evolved to mooch of society from aid, the people who for generations haven't had to work for it or have a culture of war and violence, the people who aren't compatible with our societies, neither genetically or culturally who the leftists are bringing in en masse.

Mexicans Outbreed whites in America, we're approaching 56%
Arabs and Africans outbreed whites in Europe, several cities and towns have already been replaced and that's how it starts.