The Notorious SLAV
Foid Oppression Denial Division Commander
★★★★★
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2022
- Posts
- 21,678
- Online time
- 3d 12h
Thoughts, UScels
?
economistwritingeveryday.com
This tends to be a common talking point on the right, that one-earner families are "impossible" now, and so women "are forced" to work. Mostly Americans debate this, but I'm pretty sure it's been brought to European political discourse as well, though it's more niche here. If what the article claims is true, then, at least for the US, that kind of view falls apart.
Is this true? In our new AEI paper, Scott Winship and I strongly disagree. First, we challenge the 62-week figure. With a few reasonable corrections to Cass’ COTI, we show that it is indeed possible for a median male earner to support a family. It takes 42 weeks, not 62 as reported in COTI.
What’s the bottom line? We find that it is actually easier for a single-earner male family to support a family than 1985, falling from about 46.4 to 44.8 weeks of work. It’s both possible and easier. You might object that this is only a small improvement. OK. But our analysis completely turns COTI on its head. And keep in mind that this is only for the five categories Cass has chosen. He has excluded most consumer goods, all of which have gotten much cheaper. Families were buying TVs in 1985, and they are buying TVs today. They are much cheaper, even without adjusting for quality improvements. With the adjustments, they are extremely cheaper. Repeat this for dozens of consumer goods excluded from COTI.
The American Family Is Thriving, Even if They Only Have One Male Earner (But Most Don’t)
62 weeks. That’s how long the median male worker would need to work in a year to support a family in 2022, according to the calculations of Oren Cass for the American Compass Cost-of-Thriving Index…
This tends to be a common talking point on the right, that one-earner families are "impossible" now, and so women "are forced" to work. Mostly Americans debate this, but I'm pretty sure it's been brought to European political discourse as well, though it's more niche here. If what the article claims is true, then, at least for the US, that kind of view falls apart.





