Admins changed my username and profile picture, for the ones who don't know: I am Justanotherbloke.
Just passing by to say that the assertion that 'All Women Are The Same' (AWALT) is a sociobiological inevitability. Their behavior follows predictable patterns because it is rooted in evolutionary hardwiring, not individual whim.
-Hypergamy:
Is not a choice but an instinctual imperative. Women are neurologically optimized to seek the highest SMV available, and their attraction is conditional, fluid, and subject to market forces. Hence I always laugh when I still see guys trying so hard, literally going out their way to jump through hoops, perform etc not knowing that they'll be tossed to the side of the road 5 months /1 year/2 years later. (She is not yours, it's just your turn).
-Solipsism:
Ensures that their decision making is fundamentally self-referential. Her perception of morality, fairness, and loyalty is filtered through her own subjective experience, not abstract principles.
-Dual 'partner' Strategy:
The simultaneous pursuit of multiple men. It is their default reproductive algorithm, observable in both modern dating markets and historical polygamous structures.
And that's also one of the reasons why I gave up before even starting, I looked at the entire 'structure' and said to myself that it's simply not worth the effort. There will always be multiple men in the picture, she will always have backup options because of that strategy and she'll always have lots of simps / orbiters / men etc in her inbox, willing to buy her gifts, simp and whatnot.
Matter of fact here is a literal quotation of my exact words in another thread:
The 'exceptions' here are statistical outliers, not refutations.
The Myth of Female Uniqueness & the Copium of 'This One Is Different'
Every man, at some point, falls prey to the delusion that 'his' chosen woman defies nature. This is a failure of Bayesian reasoning.
Let me explain it in simple words:
'The 'Good Girl' Mirage: The chaste, modest, or seemingly loyal woman is not an exception, she is a tactical variation. Her behavior is either:
1). A short-term mating strategy (virginity as a bargaining chip for long term investment).
2). A function of limited opportunity (the wall comes for all women, and desperation breeds temporary virtue).
3). The Hive Mind Effect, Women are socially synchronized. Their beliefs, desires, and behaviors are not independently derived but collectively reinforced through social proof.
This explains:
-The rapid spread of feminist dogma.
-The uniformity of dating app behavior (e.g., 'I love travel' > 'My standards are non-negotiable').
-The sudden, mass abandonment of beta males once women hit their late 20s and realize hypergamy has an expiration date.
My conclusion here is, that the woman you believe is 'different' is simply running the same program with a different interface.
Just another disloyal whore / Jezebel slut (if you believe in God).
Another important point I want to mention is the Body Count Deception:
Female Sexual History Is Always Worse Than Disclosed.
The modern sexual marketplace ensures that even the most 'conservative' women accumulate partners at rates that would have been unthinkable in pre-industrial societies.
The average woman you cross paths woth every day, has the body count of an ancient prostitute, and in today's degenerate society it's deemed normal.
We all know about the 80/20 rule on this forum, this means that even average women have rotated through multiple sexual partners before settling with their simp suck husband. The 'low body count' claim is statistically improbable without extreme religious or cultural enforcement.
Also people fail to take into consideration something called the Underreporting Bias. Studies confirm that women systematically undercount sexual partners, while men overcount. In other words, her stated number is a floor, not a ceiling.
The 'innocence' narrative is nothing but a strategic deception, designed to secure commitment from high-
trust males (I call them simps).
Implication here is that If you are dating a woman over 25 in the West, assume that her sexual history is in the double digits. If she claims otherwise, she is either lying or an extreme outlier who is probably under the purest form of Sharia law, in the middle of nowhere with no internet connection and completely cut off from dense population.
For the religious ones on the forum, even though I am not religious anymore myself, what about the Demonology
of female nature: Lilith, Jezebel, and the Eternal Feminine?
Even secular observers must acknowledge that mythology encodes deep truths about human nature.
-Lilith: the first wife of Adam who refused submission symbolizes female sexual agency unrestrained by male control.
-Jezebel: the manipulative queen who weaponized sex and social power represents the dark triad feminine which includes narcissism, machiavellianism and exploitative 'charm'.
These are not ancient superstitions but eternal behavioral archetypes. The modern 'liberated' woman does not transcend these patterns, she literally embodies them more fully than ever before in 2025.
The rational response would detachment, understanding that their nature is not fixable.
I myself through disciplined observation across multiple case studies, including my own initial hopes of discovering exceptions discovered something that reveals a consistent recurring pattern. Even when controlling for variables like education level, cultural background, or professed values, the fundamental behavioral algorithm remains invariant.
This is not anecdotal frustration but reproducible social physics.
Observed pattern:
Initial presentation of uniqueness (the 'special snowflake' phase) > Gradual emergence of hypergamous tells (increased orbiters, shifting standards) > Eventual confirmation of baseline AWALT parameters
I've documented this sequence with metronomic regularity, we have all seen it before:
-The woman who claimed to 'hate modern dating' but kept ex-lovers in her phone, has tons of simp orbiters,
-The 'old-fashioned' girl whose 'body count just happened to be 8 by the age of 22.
Each data point reinforces the model's predictive validity.
The conclusion is inescapable: when every apparent exception ultimately converges with the mean, we're not observing outliers anymore, we're identifying the true population parameters. This is why pattern recognition separates the intellectually honest from the wishful thinkers.
Just passing by to say that the assertion that 'All Women Are The Same' (AWALT) is a sociobiological inevitability. Their behavior follows predictable patterns because it is rooted in evolutionary hardwiring, not individual whim.
-Hypergamy:
Is not a choice but an instinctual imperative. Women are neurologically optimized to seek the highest SMV available, and their attraction is conditional, fluid, and subject to market forces. Hence I always laugh when I still see guys trying so hard, literally going out their way to jump through hoops, perform etc not knowing that they'll be tossed to the side of the road 5 months /1 year/2 years later. (She is not yours, it's just your turn).
-Solipsism:
Ensures that their decision making is fundamentally self-referential. Her perception of morality, fairness, and loyalty is filtered through her own subjective experience, not abstract principles.
-Dual 'partner' Strategy:
The simultaneous pursuit of multiple men. It is their default reproductive algorithm, observable in both modern dating markets and historical polygamous structures.
And that's also one of the reasons why I gave up before even starting, I looked at the entire 'structure' and said to myself that it's simply not worth the effort. There will always be multiple men in the picture, she will always have backup options because of that strategy and she'll always have lots of simps / orbiters / men etc in her inbox, willing to buy her gifts, simp and whatnot.
Matter of fact here is a literal quotation of my exact words in another thread:
The 'exceptions' here are statistical outliers, not refutations.
The Myth of Female Uniqueness & the Copium of 'This One Is Different'
Every man, at some point, falls prey to the delusion that 'his' chosen woman defies nature. This is a failure of Bayesian reasoning.
Let me explain it in simple words:
'The 'Good Girl' Mirage: The chaste, modest, or seemingly loyal woman is not an exception, she is a tactical variation. Her behavior is either:
1). A short-term mating strategy (virginity as a bargaining chip for long term investment).
2). A function of limited opportunity (the wall comes for all women, and desperation breeds temporary virtue).
3). The Hive Mind Effect, Women are socially synchronized. Their beliefs, desires, and behaviors are not independently derived but collectively reinforced through social proof.
This explains:
-The rapid spread of feminist dogma.
-The uniformity of dating app behavior (e.g., 'I love travel' > 'My standards are non-negotiable').
-The sudden, mass abandonment of beta males once women hit their late 20s and realize hypergamy has an expiration date.
My conclusion here is, that the woman you believe is 'different' is simply running the same program with a different interface.
Just another disloyal whore / Jezebel slut (if you believe in God).
Another important point I want to mention is the Body Count Deception:
Female Sexual History Is Always Worse Than Disclosed.
The modern sexual marketplace ensures that even the most 'conservative' women accumulate partners at rates that would have been unthinkable in pre-industrial societies.
The average woman you cross paths woth every day, has the body count of an ancient prostitute, and in today's degenerate society it's deemed normal.
We all know about the 80/20 rule on this forum, this means that even average women have rotated through multiple sexual partners before settling with their simp suck husband. The 'low body count' claim is statistically improbable without extreme religious or cultural enforcement.
Also people fail to take into consideration something called the Underreporting Bias. Studies confirm that women systematically undercount sexual partners, while men overcount. In other words, her stated number is a floor, not a ceiling.
The 'innocence' narrative is nothing but a strategic deception, designed to secure commitment from high-
trust males (I call them simps).
Implication here is that If you are dating a woman over 25 in the West, assume that her sexual history is in the double digits. If she claims otherwise, she is either lying or an extreme outlier who is probably under the purest form of Sharia law, in the middle of nowhere with no internet connection and completely cut off from dense population.
For the religious ones on the forum, even though I am not religious anymore myself, what about the Demonology
of female nature: Lilith, Jezebel, and the Eternal Feminine?
Even secular observers must acknowledge that mythology encodes deep truths about human nature.
-Lilith: the first wife of Adam who refused submission symbolizes female sexual agency unrestrained by male control.
-Jezebel: the manipulative queen who weaponized sex and social power represents the dark triad feminine which includes narcissism, machiavellianism and exploitative 'charm'.
These are not ancient superstitions but eternal behavioral archetypes. The modern 'liberated' woman does not transcend these patterns, she literally embodies them more fully than ever before in 2025.
The rational response would detachment, understanding that their nature is not fixable.
I myself through disciplined observation across multiple case studies, including my own initial hopes of discovering exceptions discovered something that reveals a consistent recurring pattern. Even when controlling for variables like education level, cultural background, or professed values, the fundamental behavioral algorithm remains invariant.
This is not anecdotal frustration but reproducible social physics.
Observed pattern:
Initial presentation of uniqueness (the 'special snowflake' phase) > Gradual emergence of hypergamous tells (increased orbiters, shifting standards) > Eventual confirmation of baseline AWALT parameters
I've documented this sequence with metronomic regularity, we have all seen it before:
-The woman who claimed to 'hate modern dating' but kept ex-lovers in her phone, has tons of simp orbiters,
-The 'old-fashioned' girl whose 'body count just happened to be 8 by the age of 22.
Each data point reinforces the model's predictive validity.
The conclusion is inescapable: when every apparent exception ultimately converges with the mean, we're not observing outliers anymore, we're identifying the true population parameters. This is why pattern recognition separates the intellectually honest from the wishful thinkers.
