Blackpill All people leave you if you're too loving/ caring.

[Pinpoint]

People are desirers of dominations who internally are measuring/ looking for validation so they can pace their way to power.
It is power people love, not companionship.
Especially when people are the victims of bullying/ rejection/ disqualification. Then they focus more on the power logistics than actual companionships in general.
People want the domination which comes with being with the right people.
I've seen 8-9/10 chads be nice, and then a woman wants to let go. It's bad halo effect to be a good person. It implies you have to use love/ compassion value, and not PURE primalistic dominarchical demeanor value to get your way. Which to a girl means that if you haven't gotten your way with being dominant, and thus have to resort to kindness/ sweetness to make social solid waves/ effects... then it's poor dominance value.
A girl wants to be with a guy who lives off of things that are exclusive to his quality in of itself.
Of course, pure looks will create a halo effect anyway that might be redeeming. But women will usually prefer an asshole.

Women, and men both know the world is insensible. They just want more competent insensible assholes on THEIR friend circle/ tribe so that they can use the collective might/ power/ domination to takedown any who oppose them. But then human beings end up fighting against even those in their tribe so they can have the feeling of domination and power too. So again primal nature/ prehistoric preprogramming for desiring dominance is what takes precedence over friendship.

The tender innocence we have gets ruined, and it's inevitable. because human beings hunger for exceptionality which cannot be shared. The hunger for exceptionality, and to ensure we get all the fun/ love... will make others eventually hate the one on top, who get it more. And the people on top hate those who may take it from them. Humanity is power mongering.
But all stands true that we want those who are domineering. If you don't have a good personality/ resource stock that can bring domination then eventually people will roll-eyes at you and move away.

 

[RodgersSecondAdvent]

Cope. People who label themselves as loving/caring are usually effeminate submissive wimps with little self-respect for themselves and people can hardly respect someone who has no self-respect.

 

[Deleted member 1410]

true, women subconcious act like it doesn't matter when it does. although its less prevalent in men. we're fucked.

Cope. People who label themselves as loving/caring are usually effeminate submissive wimps with little self-respect for themselves and people can hardly respect someone who has no self-respect.

at this point, I'm just a sadistic asshole.

 

[Pinpoint]

Cope. People who label themselves as loving/caring are usually effeminate submissive wimps with little self-respect for themselves and people can hardly respect someone who has no self-respect.

lmao. But that's what I'm saying. People are measuring you over your power-value. But that's the usual. I'm talking about the unusual people who don't have the dominance hierarchy spark which comes with being a good person. People want to ride the big kahuna dominance wave. Being a good person makes you boring. Even if you're good looking it's like a ceremonial sword. Not practical, but beautiful. Like a sword with a broken edge.
Power value/ dominarchical value.
While most sentimentalists are using it as a last resort tactic to acquire friends... for those who are genuinely nice... out of their nature (rare) then they're de-selected because being nice in of itself doesn't help the majority of mankind with its ambitions. That's why even good looking guys who are nice get cheated on by girls. They're not entertaining/ fun/ enjoyable. Girls will keep them as a side-guy, if they wanna have a rub up with their big dick (we're talking chad here). But they'll want someone they can go on domination/ narcissistic supply adventures with.

Looks get you far... but they're like a nuclear weapon. They give one huge impact explosion.
For a woman, every kind of boom, pop, bam, sploosh, blast for all your collective features have a half life depending on their esteem/ desire system. Looks work for a long time... usually depending on how superficial her primality is.
You need to keep substances consistent, fresh and sparking WITHOUT coming off subservient to do so.

Women are looking for validation. It's a part of their narcissistic quest for TOTAL social dominance to impress the hard-to-impress. They want that narcissistic gratification which comes with being versatile, and every type of human primality's type. Women are so fucking aware that men are superficial/ humanity is superficial. And none of that bullshit liberal bluepill brainwashing can change that, or else women wouldn't FEEL nervous around other people about their judgment about looks. OR that the value of their looks/ makeup/ staying thin will YIELD high results.

Women are alien observers sampling themselves into the external world hoping for good reactions. Solipsism social gold mining. And the reacitons they read form people, and how much goods/ graces/ gifts they receive reflect their evolutionary/ social success. Same with guys, or everyone. That's why we pick people who are more challenging, and imply a wider variety of traits we would have to be impressive to them. We are trying to manipulate/ trick them with FORMIDABLE/ PERFECT airs rather than to risk being lackluster with our true selves.

Instead of being pure looks, or being a nice guy...
A more long lasting/ ever-giving kind of value will be being entertaining/ impressive/ statusmaxed/ adventurer maxed.
Looks are just a vehicle for carrying all these goodies/ funride suprises. Even if you like the car you got to the carnival in, you'll still want to have fun rides. That's where your passive/ new/ varying value must come in. Looks are ever-constant but girls need new stimulus... because the car gets dull even if it's amazing. She'll want to go drive it places with different stimulus like the grand canyon, san fran, new york, etc.

 

[micropenis29]

High IQ for the most part. But as for the following:

I've seen 8-9/10 chads be nice, and then a woman wants to let go. It's bad halo effect to be a good person. It implies you have to use love/ compassion value, and not PURE primalistic dominarchical demeanor value to get your way. Which to a girl means that if you haven't gotten your way with being dominant, and thus have to resort to kindness/ sweetness to make social solid waves/ effects... then it's poor dominance value.
A girl wants to be with a guy who lives off of things that are exclusive to his quality in of itself.
Of course, pure looks will create a halo effect anyway that might be redeeming. But women will usually prefer an asshole.

I think you may be conflating "nice" with "needy." Nobody wants needy people in their lives. But only dumbasses don't want nice people in their lives.

Having said that, many foids are indeed dumbasses, and so they do prefer men that are assholes instead of nice men. But this is because they're literally too stupid to know what's in their own best interest; without men governing them, foids are basically monkeys, not humans.

 

[Pinpoint]

High IQ for the most part. But as for the following:



I think you may be conflating "nice" with "needy." Nobody wants needy people in their lives. But only dumbasses don't want nice people in their lives.

Having said that, many foids are indeed dumbasses, and so they do prefer men that are assholes instead of nice men. But this is because they're literally too stupid to know what's in their own best interest; without men governing them, foids are basically monkeys, not humans.

Needy is a splinter of being nice. The need to be social/ considerate/ communal is often just low self esteem needing a rinse of validation in disguise. But I'm saying the guys who are nice/ impressed by women already have fulfilled their role in their agenda, and so they will seek narcissism supply form someone who gives off more aloof/ dominarchic/ taciturn airs that will inspire fear/ nervousness/ anxiety/ feelings of inferiority in others. And when the GIRL is the EXCEPTION to what MOST PEOPLE WILL BE CAMPED IN (feeling pathetic, fearful, inadequate) with signals of being HIGH value from the guy who ... by his looks/ money/ status imply being in the midst of many high competence/ elite/ halo effect lifestyle... will give her the self esteem boost/ achievement.

This is also applicable to how females deem high-tier foids, or men to other men/ girls.


Nice people are a nice treat. Sometimes they can give the valuesignalization (value signalling) effect from their approval. Where if you see the socio-inclusivity/ exclusivity patterns of say... really nice loving christians who are all 7-8+/10 white wasps. They reject nonwhites because of subconscious racial biases. So if you're a black girl, then you get the narcissism supply notion (NSN) from being included amongst those in your race who get dismissed.
Again, since no one is blackpilled/ articulative in those kind of communities, then they won't have their unconscious racism mentioned, nevermind pin-downed. All the white wasps have to do is play the dudebro dismission game, make the other person look like they're overreaching/ weird/ paranoid, and their sociovalue drops down to the point of being dismission worthy.
The black girl will be happy to be included and may not act totally insecure/ racist towards whites because of her low self esteem. But in the back of her head she will always know that she is fearful of being rejected/ undervalued to the point of being camped back with her other low status afro clique.
But if the time came where she felt she could score higher with EVEN MORE high-regality/ hardtoimpress people, then she may forsake those nice people for even snootier whites with MORE halo effect material value that would subcommunicate regality/ dominarchical universal currency value.

 

[micropenis29]

Needy is a splinter of being nice. The need to be social/ considerate/ communal is often just low self esteem needing a rinse of validation in disguise. But I'm saying the guys who are nice/ impressed by women already have fulfilled their role in their agenda, and so they will seek narcissism supply form someone who gives off more aloof/ dominarchic/ taciturn airs that will inspire fear/ nervousness/ anxiety/ feelings of inferiority in others.

Can you give an example?

So if you're a black girl, then you get the narcissism supply notion (NSN) from being included amongst those in your race who get dismissed.

You're saying black girls are attracted to white men more than men of their own race then? Or did I misinterpret that?

 

[Pinpoint]

Having said that, many foids are indeed dumbasses, and so they do prefer men that are assholes instead of nice men. But this is because they're literally too stupid to know what's in their own best interest; without men governing them, foids are basically monkeys, not humans.

Not entirely. I think they're semiaware of what they want, and are in collusion with their narcissism. It's a biological predisposition for us to want to be dominant, and to observe our value by seeing who validates it, and gaining resources to get with the people who are less nice/ aloof, and thusly are more selective when it comes to quality. When a female gains the favor of these kind of people she is happy... becuase it makes her feel closer to the identity that SHE finds ideal. Women are designed to follow the darkest and most dominant predators.

It's a projection of what good looking people are.
And how they are supposed to act their role, as selectivistic snoots who don't care about human plight, but only about the best the lessers can offer them.
People buy into this. This is the primaplacementarchy. Primal placement Alpha-Zeta male/ female hierarchy.

Those of HIGH good looking/ high material status, and thus that opens the door for you to be a qualifier or disqualifier to women/ men who want to have the status/ inclusion in the circle of reality you represent.
Where they are all trying to be qualificative of the intrigue sphere of good looking people. Because they've seen the best, and have had access because of their genetic equipment to the best ability/ power/ elegance/ etc. Where they are made of heavendust, and weave the web of greatness with it.
This is why the halo effect treats good people well, and incels with disrepute.
It doesn't FEEL achieving when you're not an aloof disposer.
People are TRYING to service the strong, and ensure they have the ENTIRE coast be clear of people who are good looking/ high competence giving them disfavor.
And the more inclined to disfavor, then the more implied that someone is somebody who is not like the majority they discard.

Can you give an example?



You're saying black girls are attracted to white men more than men of their own race then? Or did I misinterpret that?

Needy = Poindexter girl who wants chad dick, but keeps coming to her after she gets blocked for being creepy (tacit remark about the closeness they're asking for making implications of things they don't want. Where it's not outright rejection, but in a neutral state, it would provide fear. Women/ men use creepy as a way to imply that they're going to be the victim of terror by association. Within the context it can mean ugly).
Nice = a guy who is kind of like a guy (in my model I was implying) 7-9/10 who remember's a girl's name, and the girl really likes that, (especially that the guy has a copious amount of women chasing him, so if she's distinct enough to have her name remembered, then it's a gesture that makes her feel highly regal... remember, the more distinct you are to a good looking person, then the better because good treatment/ remarkability typically come their way, thusly if you are good amidst all that, then it shows eximiarchical value which means being exceptional (as eximia means exceptional in latin)) but eventually the girl gets bored of him, and she leaves, but he does not pursue and lets her be her.
A needer is a pursuer who offers sentimentality.
A nice guy is a guy who doesn't usually have a pre-set agenda to attract the girl, or doesn't even have calculation in how he attracts her, but is just naturally nice.



No I'm saying that blacks typically are of low value compared to wasp whites, especially by black girl perception. So if a black girl is included by the whites, then she feels like she is better than her other black friends. ESPECIALLY when those waspy whites have an unconscious racial bias towards blacks.
The black girl wants the narcissism capital from the whites who have better facial features/ taller/ aren't ghetto/ are a part of symphonic music groups and nothing ghetto/ unregal like rap... RnB.
So that's why even if they ARE nice, she will appreciate their value.
Or another example are wasp whites WITHOUT severe racial prejudice unconscious bias.
Then in that case they are nice, but the black girl underlyingly esteems their friendship more than her other black friends BECAUSE they are better looking/ more regal/ more capable of producing the ominous oppression impression because they are rich 7-9/10 etc.
But as soon as the black girl finds someone of higher material value substance than them... who is definitely more snooty/ non-cohesive/ more covertly/ overtly bumptious about people's primal/ dominarchical quality in their environment... then she will probably forsake the nice people for someone of that kind of nature.

But that's kind of iffy. Because the good looking people are probably good enough for her. Especially if she came from low status. So she will try and stay with them. The value difference in a stacy slut who may be like a 9/10 to a nicer stacy who is an 8/10 is probably irrelevant to a black girl, and probably undesirable considering the price tag that would be exceptionally high for such a SMALL gain for a black girl compared to the 8/10 (which is the 9/10 snoot stacy). Being with a 6/10+ white girl is probably enough to satisfy her. But in typical cases... the higher the value, and the more aloof the demeanor (thusly the higher the valuesignalization of getting with a person whose favor shows EXTREME eximiarchy capital (exceptionality value)) the better.

 

[micropenis29]

Not entirely. I think they're semiaware of what they want, and are in collusion with their narcissism. It's a biological predisposition for us to want to be dominant, and to observe our value by seeing who validates it, and gaining resources to get with the people who are less nice/ aloof, and thusly are more selective when it comes to quality. When a female gains the favor of these kind of people she is happy... becuase it makes her feel closer to the identity that SHE finds ideal. Women are designed to follow the darkest and most dominant predators.

Interesting. So niceness basically signals the opposite of dominance? Can you give an example of someone displaying dominance? It's hard for me to imagine aside from the stereotypical "bad boy" drug dealer thug Tyrone type that is the leader of a gang or something.

It's a projection of what good looking people are.
And how they are supposed to act their role, as selectivistic snoots who don't care about human plight, but only about the best the lessers can offer them.
People buy into this. This is the primaplacementarchy. Primal placement Alpha-Zeta male/ female hierarchy.

So being a "selectivistic snoot" is attractive to people?

Those of HIGH good looking/ high material status, and thus that opens the door for you to be a qualifier or disqualifier to women/ men who want to have the status/ inclusion in the circle of reality you represent.
Where they are all trying to be qualificative of the intrigue sphere of good looking people. Because they've seen the best, and have had access because of their genetic equipment to the best ability/ power/ elegance/ etc. Where they are made of heavendust, and weave the web of greatness with it.
This is why the halo effect treats good people well, and incels with disrepute.
It doesn't FEEL achieving when you're not an aloof disposer.
People are TRYING to service the strong, and ensure they have the ENTIRE coast be clear of people who are good looking/ high competence giving them disfavor.
And the more inclined to disfavor, then the more implied that someone is somebody who is not like the majority they discard.

This makes sense but I'm having trouble understanding the very last sentence. Why will they discard someone who is not like the majority?

 

[Pinpoint]

Interesting. So niceness basically signals the opposite of dominance? Can you give an example of someone displaying dominance? It's hard for me to imagine aside from the stereotypical "bad boy" drug dealer thug Tyrone type that is the leader of a gang or something.



So being a "selectivistic snoot" is attractive to people?



This makes sense but I'm having trouble understanding the very last sentence. Why will they discard someone who is not like the majority?

Typical dominance is someone like Dwayne Johnson to George Clooney.
A typical badboy would be a rapper/ thug/ rockstar. Essentially rapper/ rockstar were combining jock with musician = rockstar bad boy.
Bad boy is supposed to have non-neanderthalistic competencies, but the emotional insight of a musician. Essentially Satan himself was a musician because music is essentially emotion-control emission in audio form.
Women want men who have practical value in the animal kingdom. Anything beyond that is off their grid.

Being a selectivistic snoot is only attractive IF you have the hierarchical value that makes them THINK you are someone of high regal status. Someone who they want to be, be around, gain validation from because THEIR validation will be the affirmation/ disaffirmation of being qualified as who they want to be.
So many women are humble/ nice only because they have a low self esteem and can't imagine themselves being judged by people who are on their dream team. They can't roll with them because THEIR criteria is set too high/ specific because they've had halo effect/ high status for their entire lives.
Women are testing the waters, looking for affirmation from those they care about. If someone is being too judgmental when they are not good looking, no smv/ lms then they will be victims of their own passive criticism. They'll be a serpent eating its own head. Irony Galore.
When they have affirmation from the people who best match their inner dream-team then they feel associated with those people. A lot of insecure girls/ models even are constantly trying to refine out the negative elements and KEEP themselves where they want to be. This is natural for the human race.
Growing up in a bad looking family, who eat fried chicken and do nothing all day should be labeled emotional abuse. It kills their kid's will to really work things out and succeed.


They would discard someone exceptional for someone who best fits their dream team. Remember, people are dominarchic aspirers. They want to be around the dominant, powerful, abusive, etc. It's human nature to get bored/ unseduced to people who are nice. They want people who demonstrate reflexes/ high deftness and physical aptitude/ bad assery/ dominarchical demeanor traits.
The more you signal taciturn tendencies, then the more you signal that your criteria is extremely tight, and many do not fit it.
It shows that you are accustom to a life that is of high value. But if this came from a kid with autism, then it would be contextualized differently. Same with good looks. If you have good looks that would be different.
People are searching for validation.
The people who are bad looking will feel lucky to get validation from good looking people.
But people's expectations raise over time. People are looking to rank up and have adventures with.
If the good looking person doesn't pose up dominarchical value, then the narcissistic supply by association will wane in value.
They want to be associated with people who are hard to get/ impressive to have.
Not to say that people will outright discard the good looking, but it will lean that way. People search for the highest value there is.





When you think of loki's speech it makes sense. We ignore the people who are good to us in favor of the people with the highest power, with the most regality, with whom we feel the most important to get favor from because being favored by the highest being is a reflection of our own exceptionality.

(The unspoken truth of how we crave subjugation is what happens when we have nothing remarkable like a GOD to serve. So we try to manifest the power of a God to give us all something to aspire to impress. Or that we become powerful and akin to a God so that we can have us feel secure/ happy with our way we spent our life, where we manifest exceptionality. But it's ultimately just a sham to hide our morbid mortality/ weakness). There's a deep joy in feeling exceptionality from the cosmos/ the universe out there for us. We know we can't understand everything. So we want the will of the universe to take care of us and say we're more exceptional than others around us. We crave the subjugation, and to be higher than others in the order of the world that the subjugator has created.

It's out desire for exceptionality/ eximiarchical value that makes us ignore love, and go after the narcissism supply that comes with having signalizations from narcissism.
It's why a like from a hot guy, or a joke told from a hot guy that an incel told her means so much more from a chad.

 

[micropenis29]

But if this came from a kid with autism, then it would be contextualized differently. Same with good looks. If you have good looks that would be different.

How so?

It's out desire for exceptionality/ eximiarchical value that makes us ignore love, and go after the narcissism supply that comes with having signalizations from narcissism.
It's why a like from a hot guy, or a joke told from a hot guy that an incel told her means so much more from a chad.

What do you mean by "ignore love?"

 

[SchrodingersDick]

True especially for women. Last line of my sig: “Murder is the ultimate aphrodisiac”

 

[Pinpoint]

How so?



What do you mean by "ignore love?"

The kid with autism is nonverbal. It would come from a mental illness.

Ignore love because it doesn't make us feel exceptional if love doesn't come from a powerful/ exceptional source. You may be loved by your family... but that's common. You may be liked by your teacher... but that's common too. To get with someone who is ATTRACTIVE ISN'T common. So an attractive person can hold a person for a while until an ALSO attractive (high LMS/ good looks) comes on the scene... and they're aloof... but also more exceptional/ a part of your dream team.
(People get dissatisfied iwth waht they have and try to upscale. Also just to prove to themselves they are capable of upranking/ and have value that can span across social circles).
A lot of people are also anxious too and may HOLD ON TIGHTLY to anything they get.
But if people are treated with enough love/ validation (which they want to) then they will treat the attractive person... like nothing.
People are looking for exceptionality. When they're ugly/ desperate they'll clench onto it... but they'll still be looking in ways to ensure that any exceptionality, like being with only ONE attractive person isn't just a fluke... they'll still subtly be trying to gain some kind of leverage to expand their primal value volume or general power.
So eventually, when people feel like they can be confident to land other mates, or they're just bored of thier current nice/ humble/ familiar one... then they'll try to GO out there and get someone more exceptional.
It's a matter of pride. People want to feel like they're a part of the dark/ untamed/ uninsulated areas of life. They don't want to find love/ compassion/ friendship with a person they have a lot in common with. People cheat because of the vanity which comes with proving they are universally valuable/ alpha/ accepted/ admired.

 

[micropenis29]

The kid with autism is nonverbal. It would come from a mental illness.

Ignore love because it doesn't make us feel exceptional if love doesn't come from a powerful/ exceptional source. You may be loved by your family... but that's common. You may be liked by your teacher... but that's common too. To get with someone who is ATTRACTIVE ISN'T common. So an attractive person can hold a person for a while until an ALSO attractive (high LMS/ good looks) comes on the scene... and they're aloof... but also more exceptional/ a part of your dream team.
(People get dissatisfied iwth waht they have and try to upscale. Also just to prove to themselves they are capable of upranking/ and have value that can span across social circles).
A lot of people are also anxious too and may HOLD ON TIGHTLY to anything they get.
But if people are treated with enough love/ validation (which they want to) then they will treat the attractive person... like nothing.
People are looking for exceptionality. When they're ugly/ desperate they'll clench onto it... but they'll still be looking in ways to ensure that any exceptionality, like being with only ONE attractive person isn't just a fluke... they'll still subtly be trying to gain some kind of leverage to expand their primal value volume or general power.
So eventually, when people feel like they can be confident to land other mates, or they're just bored of thier current nice/ humble/ familiar one... then they'll try to GO out there and get someone more exceptional.
It's a matter of pride. People want to feel like they're a part of the dark/ untamed/ uninsulated areas of life. They don't want to find love/ compassion/ friendship with a person they have a lot in common with. People cheat because of the vanity which comes with proving they are universally valuable/ alpha/ accepted/ admired.

That makes sense. I've always seen "friendship" as inherently unsustainable and therefore mostly meaningless for these reasons.

 

[Pinpoint]

That makes sense. I've always seen "friendship" as inherently unsustainable and therefore mostly meaningless for these reasons.

I am one of the only people on this forum who can find and define these patterns. Sucks how fairy braided our whole fucking society is. We've never had a platform that can acccurately articulate these things because of fairy braiders/ the powerful putting on an information embargo on everything.

 

[Grotesque]

All people leave you if you're too UGLY.

 

[Zaetheus]

All people leave you if you're too UGLY.

 

[Pinpoint]

All people leave you if you're too UGLY.

Think about it this way. Your looks' novelty lose out if you're too boring/ and you dont' use it right. If you don't have any thug/ bad boy/ exceptionality game to your identity besides looks.
Yes looks can sustain you, and it may even can halt the psychological pressure of boredom (underlying ambition) to uprank to someone who has the ominous dominarchy presence that more people will fear/ revel in. But that psychological pressure of tyrannohypergamy is still out there... waiting.

 

[Grotesque]

Think about it this way. Your looks' novelty lose out if you're too boring/ and you dont' use it right. If you don't have any thug/ bad boy/ exceptionality game to your identity besides looks.
Yes looks can sustain you, and it may even can halt the psychological pressure of boredom (underlying ambition) to uprank to someone who has the ominous dominarchy presence that more people will fear/ revel in. But that psychological pressure of tyrannohypergamy is still out there... waiting.

A female is not impressed with your big words, she's impressed by your hyoid bone.

 

[Pinpoint]

A female is not impressed with your big words, she's impressed by your hyoid bone.

Kind of responding to this past my point/ intended communication, as usual with tardcels.
I don't care if they're not.
This is about analyzing them/ finding them out.
Not trying to impress them.
Mispremising my message.

Sidestepping, and circling around my point.
No duh, primal nature of women.