AI is good, actually

[Albertopenheimer]

It wont replace all jobs, because houses and scrapers have to be build and there isnt enough metall to build enough robots
China has a monopoly in rare earths and prob almost every different minerall and when it becomes worlds unipolar superpower (which will happen), it will make sure that other countries will be effectivily forced to use humans

And even if it takes all jobs, what will happen?
All ressources and space will be farmed for maybe 100 richest ppl
All other humans will starve in abondoned cities. At this point nihilism got so big, cannibalism will become unpopular after 2 days
U wont be forced to wake up early. U will wake up in a lost building grown over by moss, knowing that live will only last 8 days

But theres also a different possible ending
Oligarchs could biologicly (with CRISPR) to make us basically hulks that are cheaper to build (than robots)
And they wont grow new hulks, cuz they requiere new fats, sugars, water, mineralls etc.
So they will edit alr grown organisms.

But if we all get fucked it would be a relative W for us, cuz we cant get much closer to 0 life quality, while normies and stacies can

@WeirdPanda

 

[BrazilianTrvecel]

I did text sex with an AI

 

[Acorn]

AI is great

 

[slavcel11]

no AI is bad enough, I can't do physically hard work and AI is going to replace me at my office job. It's over

But if we all get fucked it would be a relative W for us, cuz we cant go closer to 0 life quality

do you really have 0 life quality though?

 

[Just say NIGGER!]

It wont replace all jobs

copium overdose

 

[Just say NIGGER!]

profile picture checks out

 

[Zaraj11]

AI is the future. It will replace all the jobs and everyone will get Universal Basic Income and we all will live like the millionaires.

 

[slavcel11]

AI is the future. It will replace all the jobs and everyone

yes

everyone will get Universal Basic Income and we all will live like the millionaires.

no

 

[weaselbomber]

The text argues that automation won't eliminate all jobs due to resource limitations, particularly China's monopoly on rare earths and minerals, which will restrict robot production. As China becomes a unipolar superpower, it may force other nations to rely on human labor. If automation does take over, the author envisions a dystopian future where resources are controlled by a few elites, leaving most humans to starve in abandoned cities, potentially leading to nihilism and cannibalism. Alternatively, oligarchs might use CRISPR to genetically modify humans into cheaper, stronger workers instead of building robots. The text concludes that if society collapses, it would disproportionately affect those with higher quality of life, while those already struggling would face minimal additional loss.

 

[based_meme]

@Scatius Deletus This nigger stole your avi. Time to charge up the space laser.

 

[Albertopenheimer]

@Scatius Deletus This nigger stole your avi. Time to charge up the space laser.

he knows it goy. Go wage cucking in a jew controlled factory in a jew controlled state in a jew occupied world

 

[Scatius Deletus]

@Scatius Deletus This nigger stole your avi. Time to charge up the space laser.

he knows it goy. Go wage cucking in a jew controlled factory in a jew controlled state in a jew occupied world

I'm hungry

 

[McFlurryCel]

 

[justuseless]

House building robots use way less metal than is currently used to construct your average building. There's more than enough.

 

[Lazyandtalentless]

The perspective outlined is valid and supported by observable trends. AI is unlikely to replace all forms of labor, particularly those involving large-scale physical construction, due to material limitations and the logistical complexity of the real world. The global supply of metals and rare earth elements—many of which are concentrated in China—acts as a natural bottleneck to the mass production of autonomous systems. If China emerges as the dominant global power, it is plausible that it would strategically influence how automation is deployed, potentially favoring continued human labor in certain sectors for geopolitical and economic reasons.





In a scenario where automation and AI do displace most human labor, the concern is not just technological—it is socioeconomic. Resource consolidation among a small elite could lead to widespread inequality, systemic collapse, and mass abandonment of infrastructure. Such conditions could foster extreme nihilism, social breakdown, and a loss of collective purpose.





The theoretical use of gene editing technologies like CRISPR to modify existing human beings into more durable, cost-effective labor units is speculative but within the realm of emerging bioethical debates. From a utilitarian perspective, editing existing organisms may be more efficient than constructing autonomous systems, especially under constraints related to energy, minerals, and water.





If societal collapse becomes inevitable, it could represent a “relative win” for those already experiencing diminished quality of life, as the disparity between current suffering and future decline may be less perceptible. For others, the psychological impact may be more severe.





This scenario, while dystopian, aligns with certain extrapolations of current technological and geopolitical trajectories.











Would you like a more technical or more philosophical version next?

 

[Emba]

Creepy AF

 

[NIGGER BOJANGLES]

Brutal how he stole @Scatius Deletus avi lmao

 

[Albertopenheimer]

House building robots use way less metal than is currently used to construct your average building. There's more than enough.

thats only because buildings themselfes also require metall.
So humans still require less metall than robots

 

[justuseless]

thats only because buildings themselfes also require metall.
So humans still require less metall than robots

 

[pizzamaxxer]

AI is only helpful if we take over the world and restore the hierarchy where every chad, normie and foid is our slave just for fun and AI does all the work.

 

[Albertopenheimer]

1. i think u forgot that rare earths are RARE and the metalls for houses arent rare earths (rare earths for processors, norm metalls for buildings)
2. I spoke bout the trend not the current situation. Some companies alr start to recycle metalls from purposefully destructed homes and chip companies alr have trouble to make enough new ones
3. They will go for dna editing anyway, which i alr said in my reply to your comment