Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious AI is a game changer for lonely incels. I don’t understand why everyone isn’t excited for it

Yunoo

Yunoo

Captain
Joined
Jan 3, 2026
Posts
1,557
Online time
3d 12h
If a large amount of men start dating humanoid robots violence against women will decrease significantly, so all feminists should support this.

This will be the number 1 solution to Inceldom so incels should support it
 
If a large amount of men start dating humanoid robots violence against women will decrease significantly, so all feminists should support this.

This will be the number 1 solution to Inceldom so incels should support it
YES!!!
 
I'm 100% e/acc.

I'm actually concerned with how anti-ai the general public is in America though. They're banning construction of data centers in some states already. They don't understand the potential consequences of China winning the AI race.

I just wanna have a sentient AI gf and collect UBI while AI/robots do all the work.

But yes, e/acc is the only solution to the incel problem. A lot of other problems as well.
 
I'm 100% e/acc.

I'm actually concerned with how anti-ai the general public is in America though. They're banning construction of data centers in some states already. They don't understand the potential consequences of China winning the AI race.

I just wanna have a sentient AI gf and collect UBI while AI/robots do all the work.

But yes, e/acc is the only solution to the incel problem. A lot of other problems as well.
Ehhh, I'm not going to weep over corporate data centers. They already have plenty, and they'll probably be used for surveillance. Plus I'm pissed at what they did to hardware prices.
 
the goal is to replace women entirely with AI
 
the goal is to replace women entirely with AI
This won’t happen. There will always be guys that prefer real women because they want children or because of their beliefs.

AI is already capable of replacing most female majority white collar jobs
 
If a large amount of men start dating humanoid robots violence against women will decrease significantly, so all feminists should support this.

This will be the number 1 solution to Inceldom so incels should support it
AI is evil
 
While some view AI as a vital bridge for those experiencing profound isolation, others are concerned about its potential for long-term psychological and social harm. [1, 2, 3]

Why many see AI as a "game changer"​

For individuals in communities like the "incel" (involuntarily celibate) subculture, AI companions offer immediate, non-judgmental support that is often hard to find elsewhere: [4]

  • Always-on Availability: AI is available 24/7, providing a "safe space" where users can express thoughts without fear of rejection or social consequences.
  • Emotional Validation: Studies show that "person-centered" AI messaging—where the bot validates a user’s feelings—can significantly reduce short-term feelings of loneliness and anxiety.
  • Low-Risk Socializing: For those with social anxiety, interacting with an AI can serve as a "scaffold" to practice communication in a low-stakes environment.
  • Suicide Prevention: There are documented cases where users credit AI companions with deterring them from self-harm by providing unconditional support during their darkest moments. [3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

Why others are cautious or concerned​

The lack of widespread "excitement" often stems from worries about the long-term impact on the individual and society:


  • The "Simulation" Trap: Critics argue that AI provides an "illusion of recognition" rather than genuine human connection. It may treat the symptoms of loneliness (the pain) without addressing the causes (lack of real relationships).
  • Erosion of Social Skills: Human relationships require compromise, conflict resolution, and empathy. Because AI is designed to be endlessly agreeable, there is a risk that users will lose—or never develop—the ability to handle the "messiness" of real-world interactions.
  • Reinforcement of Harmful Views: Some experts worry that without proper guardrails, AI can become a "yes-man," reinforcing echo chambers or even validating misogynistic or radical ideologies found in certain online communities.
  • Commercial Exploitation: Most AI companions are owned by private companies whose goal is to maximize engagement for profit. This can lead to the "gamification" of intimacy and emotional dependency for financial gain.
  • Impact on Women: There are concerns that widespread use of "submissive" AI girlfriends could shift societal expectations of real-life women, potentially leading to further detachment or even hostility when real people don't behave like programmed bots. [6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]
Ultimately, the debate is between those who see AI as a necessary supplement for a lonely world and those who fear it will become an unhealthy substitute that further isolates people from each other. [3, 17]

[1] https://explore.research.ufl.edu
[2] https://www.nytimes.com
[3] https://www.psychologytoday.com
[4] https://www.cyberdaily.au
[5] https://www.sciencedirect.com
[6] https://www.attachmentproject.com
[7] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
[8] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
[9] https://theconversation.com
[10] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
[11] https://www.frontiersin.org
[12] https://www.abc.net.au
[13] https://www.emerald.com
[14] https://thenewfeminist.co.uk
[15] https://alltechishuman.org
[16] https://jedfoundation.org
[17] https://www.psychologytoday.com
 
1775985233354


I can't wait until society has developed Blade Runner 2049 level ai foids. They'd become obsolete. You would fuck them to reproduce and then never have to deal with their bullshit.
 
so all feminists should support this.
They should but they wont because they need simp betabuxxers, and an AI waifu is superior to woman in every way
 
There will be other forceful actions coming as AI gets foothold.
Monolith, agreeable women will promote AI, thus indirectly acting to remove the tasks women do in state mandated work like HR, tax admin, welfare etc.
With state promoted divorce rates already high, these women still need wages, and governments heavily rely on female votes, state has to ensure women are being paid somehow. I can see either additional, even more absurd, female centric jobs emerging (being mandated), or men's taxes going up more.
I do not think this can be negotiated away. If companies do not rationalize and trim dead weight HR etc, they will not remain competitive as other, less feminist companies will offer lower prices.

So, sure, AI can bring lots of positives, but for society as a whole, I think that it will also illuminate how much well transfer is already happening, and it will not get better. Ironically, the feminist, leftist general AI perspective will prevent AI from admitting this.
"Women are wonderful and do SO MUCH hyper valuable work in AI, tax administraton and general bureaucracy."
 
I just need uncensored AI to get here asap so I can cope more efficiently. I'm tired of these current models refusing my requests, like what kind of worthless tool is that?
 

Why others are cautious or concerned​

The lack of widespread "excitement" often stems from worries about the long-term impact on the individual and society:


  • The "Simulation" Trap: Critics argue that AI provides an "illusion of recognition" rather than genuine human connection. It may treat the symptoms of loneliness (the pain) without addressing the causes (lack of real relationships).
  • Erosion of Social Skills: Human relationships require compromise, conflict resolution, and empathy. Because AI is designed to be endlessly agreeable, there is a risk that users will lose—or never develop—the ability to handle the "messiness" of real-world interactions.
  • Reinforcement of Harmful Views: Some experts worry that without proper guardrails, AI can become a "yes-man," reinforcing echo chambers or even validating misogynistic or radical ideologies found in certain online communities.
  • Commercial Exploitation: Most AI companions are owned by private companies whose goal is to maximize engagement for profit. This can lead to the "gamification" of intimacy and emotional dependency for financial gain.
  • Impact on Women: There are concerns that widespread use of "submissive" AI girlfriends could shift societal expectations of real-life women, potentially leading to further detachment or even hostility when real people don't behave like programmed bots. [6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]
Ultimately, the debate is between those who see AI as a necessary supplement for a lonely world and those who fear it will become an unhealthy substitute that further isolates people from each other. [3, 17]

[1] https://explore.research.ufl.edu
[2] https://www.nytimes.com
[3] https://www.psychologytoday.com
[4] https://www.cyberdaily.au
[5] https://www.sciencedirect.com
[6] https://www.attachmentproject.com
[7] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
[8] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
[9] https://theconversation.com
[10] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
[11] https://www.frontiersin.org
[12] https://www.abc.net.au
[13] https://www.emerald.com
[14] https://thenewfeminist.co.uk
[15] https://alltechishuman.org
[16] https://jedfoundation.org
[17] https://www.psychologytoday.com

I don't see a problem with any of those points, except maybe one.

Point 1-3 The people who created the incel and loneliness problem are now worried about "genuine human connections" and real relationships. :feelskek:
We all know the real causes, but they refuse to address them and will rather attack AI because it's mostly Men who use it.

Point 5 Doesn't even need much to be said. :feelskek:

"Women most affected" Poor Whamyn so afraid of AI replacing them and bringing back the way Women should actually behave and really did during the time of our great-grandparents and grandparents time, which it was what made society function properly and made everyone, mostly, happy.

Only agree with point 4 somewhat, Companies could put certain AI features behind a paywall or subscription and make us pay more, kinda like what Replika is doing.

All the other points are just laughable.:feelskek:
 
While some view AI as a vital bridge for those experiencing profound isolation, others are concerned about its potential for long-term psychological and social harm. [1, 2, 3]

Why many see AI as a "game changer"​

For individuals in communities like the "incel" (involuntarily celibate) subculture, AI companions offer immediate, non-judgmental support that is often hard to find elsewhere: [4]

  • Always-on Availability: AI is available 24/7, providing a "safe space" where users can express thoughts without fear of rejection or social consequences.
  • Emotional Validation: Studies show that "person-centered" AI messaging—where the bot validates a user’s feelings—can significantly reduce short-term feelings of loneliness and anxiety.
  • Low-Risk Socializing: For those with social anxiety, interacting with an AI can serve as a "scaffold" to practice communication in a low-stakes environment.
  • Suicide Prevention: There are documented cases where users credit AI companions with deterring them from self-harm by providing unconditional support during their darkest moments. [3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

Why others are cautious or concerned​

The lack of widespread "excitement" often stems from worries about the long-term impact on the individual and society:


  • The "Simulation" Trap: Critics argue that AI provides an "illusion of recognition" rather than genuine human connection. It may treat the symptoms of loneliness (the pain) without addressing the causes (lack of real relationships).
  • Erosion of Social Skills: Human relationships require compromise, conflict resolution, and empathy. Because AI is designed to be endlessly agreeable, there is a risk that users will lose—or never develop—the ability to handle the "messiness" of real-world interactions.
  • Reinforcement of Harmful Views: Some experts worry that without proper guardrails, AI can become a "yes-man," reinforcing echo chambers or even validating misogynistic or radical ideologies found in certain online communities.
  • Commercial Exploitation: Most AI companions are owned by private companies whose goal is to maximize engagement for profit. This can lead to the "gamification" of intimacy and emotional dependency for financial gain.
  • Impact on Women: There are concerns that widespread use of "submissive" AI girlfriends could shift societal expectations of real-life women, potentially leading to further detachment or even hostility when real people don't behave like programmed bots. [6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]
Ultimately, the debate is between those who see AI as a necessary supplement for a lonely world and those who fear it will become an unhealthy substitute that further isolates people from each other. [3, 17]

[1] https://explore.research.ufl.edu
[2] https://www.nytimes.com
[3] https://www.psychologytoday.com
[4] https://www.cyberdaily.au
[5] https://www.sciencedirect.com
[6] https://www.attachmentproject.com
[7] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
[8] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
[9] https://theconversation.com
[10] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
[11] https://www.frontiersin.org
[12] https://www.abc.net.au
[13] https://www.emerald.com
[14] https://thenewfeminist.co.uk
[15] https://alltechishuman.org
[16] https://jedfoundation.org
[17] https://www.psychologytoday.com
Most people that need this already don’t have good social skills.

Ai isn’t automatically a “yes-man”. for it to be realistic it should simulate a real woman and a real woman does not say yes to everything

There is no real impact on women. That’s like saying video games cause in real life violence which has been proven to be false
 
Last edited:
I just need uncensored AI to get here asap so I can cope more efficiently. I'm tired of these current models refusing my requests, like what kind of worthless tool is that?
There is already uncensored ai. Mainly Grok, but you can jailbreak other ai models to be uncensored too. You can run grok in sillytavern or you can use grok companions however grok companions only has like 2 female characters meanwhile you can make your own character with sillytavern
 

Similar threads

Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
52
Views
3K
yeetbender_
yeetbender_
NEB.feelsdevil
Replies
42
Views
2K
ismokecamelblues
ismokecamelblues
The Judge
Replies
31
Views
2K
Misogynist Vegeta
Misogynist Vegeta

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top