Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Age of Consent laws

incel-american

incel-american

Banned
-
Joined
Nov 9, 2017
Posts
767
Age of consent laws serve dual purposes. The primary purpose is protecting literal children from getting taken advantage of sexually. The secondary purpose is removing women aged 14 to 17 from the larger sexual marketplace as to make dating easier for older women.

Men up to their mid 20s are NATURALLY "alpha" from the perspective of females aged 14 to 17. The male has more maturity, more money,etc. But since men aged 19 to 25 are legally forbidden from dating these younger gals, they (the men) have to try to go after women their own age who are also being competed for by men up to their mid 30s. This naturally makes dating life easier for roasties, because they aren't sexually competing against much younger but sexually viable younger women, and harder for the younger (up to mid 20s) men, because of the larger pool of men they're competing with for those roasties.

If it was legal to date younger girls (by which I mean fertile females in their teenaged years) there would be a lot fewer incels today. You are forbidden by law from using your natural advantage in age/maturity/status to attract younger women. The incel problem is a result of poor genetics AND artificial constraints on the sexual marketplace (the other one is the prohibition of prostitution).


edit: I'm sorry if this is obvious. I've never seen this argument stated clearly and I thought I'd do it.
 
Last edited:
Chad doesn't give a fuck about age. I've seen Chads fuck 14-17 girls every day with no consequences.
 
Chad doesn't give a fuck about age. I've seen Chads fuck 14-17 girls every day with no consequences.

Shut the fuck up with that low IQ shit. Adult Chad ain't nailing teenaged girls unless he and the girl are part of the Hispanic community.
 
What is the difference for us? We have no chance with 14-17 anyway.
 
Shut the fuck up with that low IQ shit. Adult Chad ain't nailing teenaged girls unless he and the girl are part of the Hispanic community.

Lol, please stop coping, I had 25-year-old Chads literally waiting up for the girls in my old highschool after classes in their car/motorcycle.
 
What is the difference for us? We have no chance with 14-17 anyway.

You'd have a greater pool of women to possibly date, and therefore greater chances of escaping inceldom (obviously) if your possible dating options were expanded to women aged 14 to 17.
 
In Sweden the age of consent is 15 and I (highly anecdotally ofc) can't see it making much of a difference tbh.
 
Where it isn't expressly illegal, it is discouraged through social shaming, for the benefit of roasties.
 
You'd have a greater pool of women to possibly date, and therefore greater chances of escaping inceldom (obviously) if your possible dating options were expanded to women aged 14 to 17.
If you increase the number of tigers from 100 to 1000 it will not make them to love potatoes.
 
If you increase the number of tigers from 100 to 1000 it will not make them to love potatoes.

It's so curious that incels are hesitant to examine the artificial causes that contribute to their plight. Women vote and help determine social mores. They have used these things to rig the sexual marketplace in favor of themselves against male interests. Why the resistance to this explanation?
 
It's so curious that incels are hesitant to examine the artificial causes that contribute to their plight. Women vote and help determine social mores. They have used these things to rig the sexual marketplace in favor of themselves against male interests. Why the resistance to this explanation?
Because women love only chad.
We are not chad.
Therefor we cannot be loved.
We can get sex by betabuxing or escortceling today also.
 
yeah, can't see how reducing the age of consent wouldn't drastically decrease the amount of incels just from a financial stability/maturity standpoint. i'm sure i'd be able to score a low self-esteemed 4/10, 16 y/o looking for an older man to provide for them if that were the case. Actually i'm just coping lol. no female regardless of age will ever find me attractive...period
 
Oh my god, I can't believe I'm saying this, but: The defeatism at this forum is out of control. Like, you guys can't imagine things being better under different social norms.
 
Age of consent laws serve dual purposes. The primary purpose is protecting literal children from getting taken advantage of sexually. The secondary purpose is removing women aged 14 to 17 from the larger sexual marketplace as to make dating easier for older women.

Men up to their mid 20s are NATURALLY "alpha" from the perspective of females aged 14 to 17. The male has more maturity, more money,etc. But since men aged 19 to 25 are legally forbidden from dating these younger gals, they (the men) have to try to go after women their own age who are also being competed for by men up to their mid 30s. This naturally makes dating life easier for roasties, because they aren't sexually competing against much younger but sexually viable younger women, and harder for the younger (up to mid 20s) men, because of the larger pool of men they're competing with for those roasties.

If it was legal to date younger girls (by which I mean fertile females in their teenaged years) there would be a lot fewer incels today. You are forbidden by law from using your natural advantage in age/maturity/status to attract younger women. The incel problem is a result of poor genetics AND artificial constraints on the sexual marketplace (the other one is the prohibition of prostitution).


edit: I'm sorry if this is obvious. I've never seen this argument stated clearly and I thought I'd do it.
Based and high IQ, well put -- is your avi Bertrand Russell? Dude wrote some brilliant papers

I somewhat understand your position on defeatism, but right now we're losing and if things do change I expect it will be at a time that's no longer relevant for me/I may even be dead at that point.

Still, to get change what needs to happen is men need to blackpill eachother/more blackpill science studies/citations need to spread. Trouble is women and bluepilled men are the majority (by far seemingly) so from that point of view seems tough to enact any real change at least in the current day. Women don't want equality so even if they did accept the blackpill science/what incels have been saying this whole time as true (they wouldn't even though it objectively is) they would still not want "equality" truly as they claim publicly since it would undermine their own self interested society they have now.

Chads also don't care and probably like the system as it is -- you also get bluepilled men who simp/betabux and we're outnumbered is what I'm saying.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top