Teutonic Knight
Mythic
★
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2019
- Posts
- 4,521
While I agree that the attitude towards the age of consent in USA is ridiculous, when you look at it pragmatically, these laws actually help to give American incels a chance when they're young.
If age of consent is 18, that means teenage boys have more chances to compete for teenage girls bellow 18, because it artificially limits the competition from other men.
It means that in high school, you will have a fairly good chance to ascend because you're only competiting against the local teenage boys.
Here the age of consent is 15 and who do you think benefits from that? The Chads, chadlites and upper tier socialmaxxed normies do because they're able to compete for these girls. I've heard about men in their 30s have relationship with females who are 15-17 and it wasn't even seen as a big deal. And those men are not "ascended incels" but regular sex-havers. Mothers don't care if their teenage daughter is dating a popular good looking older Chad.
When I went to high school I remember some older men were already flirting openly with my female classmates. They were good looking men in their 20s with money and cars who mogged the 16 year old version of me to oblivion.
JFL at American incels here who think a 15 year old girl would even look at them if the age of consent was 14 or 15 like it is in most of Europe. Chads in their 20s would already flirt with them as soon as they were legal. You would get nothing from lowering the age of consent other than making life even more difficult for teenage sub8 men.
Now here is the most bitter pill to swallow:
You had your best chance when you were a teen precisely because of the age of consent laws and you didn't make it. Nothing is going to change that. You had a chance and you couldn't take it. Eurocels didn't even have such a great chance to begin with.
If age of consent is 18, that means teenage boys have more chances to compete for teenage girls bellow 18, because it artificially limits the competition from other men.
It means that in high school, you will have a fairly good chance to ascend because you're only competiting against the local teenage boys.
Here the age of consent is 15 and who do you think benefits from that? The Chads, chadlites and upper tier socialmaxxed normies do because they're able to compete for these girls. I've heard about men in their 30s have relationship with females who are 15-17 and it wasn't even seen as a big deal. And those men are not "ascended incels" but regular sex-havers. Mothers don't care if their teenage daughter is dating a popular good looking older Chad.
When I went to high school I remember some older men were already flirting openly with my female classmates. They were good looking men in their 20s with money and cars who mogged the 16 year old version of me to oblivion.
JFL at American incels here who think a 15 year old girl would even look at them if the age of consent was 14 or 15 like it is in most of Europe. Chads in their 20s would already flirt with them as soon as they were legal. You would get nothing from lowering the age of consent other than making life even more difficult for teenage sub8 men.
Now here is the most bitter pill to swallow:
You had your best chance when you were a teen precisely because of the age of consent laws and you didn't make it. Nothing is going to change that. You had a chance and you couldn't take it. Eurocels didn't even have such a great chance to begin with.
Last edited: