holy cope holy cope holy cope
And you're a nigger
If you think "cold-adapted" excludes Meds, you're a moron because I didn't once say that. If you're a non, you should hang yourself.
I am turkish stfu, turks are white
Based retard, completely contradicts my post as well
In the alps, maybe. In central and southern italy (Where civilization was), the winters are much more mild compared to the rest of europe. Yes there's night frost but it's not nearly cold enough for vegetation to completely die off. Staples like wheat, grapes and olives are perfectly fine
You're such an idiot lol. The populations of Egypt and Mesopotamia back-migrated and or intermixed with people from colder climates. There's snow in Italy and Greece as well. You're also forgetting that there were ice ages.
"Blacks dindu nothin, we was lynched for no reason at all". Lynchings were done because of black crime. Rape, assault, stealing, etc. In a more decentralized time, action was more likely to have been taken by communities instead of authorities. You can't seriously believe that every lynching or race riot throughout American history happened solely because "wypipo was bein raycist an shieettt". A small incident can easily evolve into widespread riots if both sides continue to escalate. If a nigger like you rapes and murders a white girl, me and my friends will go and string your black ass up. If your nigger brethren have a problem and start rioting, then we'll defend ourselves. That's the story of every race riot in history.
Good go murder hundreds of innocent people because some white foid lied.
I try not to engage in the buffoonery of you trolls, but they literally had intermediate/olive skin, which is currently found all over Europe but mostly among the Mediterranean.
The theory argues that the European climate allowed for certain traits to be selected, which enabled us to get where we are. It gets cold and humid in the Mediterranean during the winter months just like everywhere else in Europe.
No, what are you talking about. Maybe in the alps or extreme north but not anywhere near where people actually lived and civilization thrived
You're a lurker too, lmfao. Kys. At the bare minimum, you have to accept that not every black person who was a victim of lynching was innocent and that, more than likely, most were guilty. Otherwise, you're not being informed by a fact-based worldview.
Talented at what? Nigger babble? Mumble rap? Blacks aren't universally athletic either; they're very poor swimmers, they don't dominate power lifting, and they don't dominate martial arts (Not to say they're uniquely bad either, just not exceedingly good that it sets them apart).
Woah woah woah dude, cool it with the racism and slurs
I'm just saying they have individual members that are actors, music artists (not all of them make mumble shit) and they become professional athletes but lots of undesirables
I dont agree genetic is one things but for me comportment are mostly based on education and even if you had the most barbarian's genetic a great education would make you a great person
So in other words lynchings were done because they did a crime while being black, which means they were lynched for no reason other than "raycist an shiett".
"Climate was the same throughout all of human evolutionary development, and people groups never migrated and intermixed."
Well the best mma fighter is def jon jones and he is black, also teddy riner is the best judoka and he is also black
Particularly heinous crimes, like rape and murder. You're also infringing on other people's property, so the punishment will always be more severe. If I were in China, I'd be 100 times more cautious to not break the law. If you were a repeat offender stealing from my shop multiple times, I'd have no problem stringing you up, whether you were black or white. Asians and Jews don't steal.
"They were lynched for no reason other than being black". They're literally committing crime, lmfao. That's a reason outside of race.
Fuck off back to Reddit
what are you waffling about
they def didnt kill them bc of the "the crimes they commited" also most of the black people who have been oppressed were innocent
Are Turks this dumb generally? Not boding well for your purported "white" status.
They absolutely did, actually. In many cases, a board was hung around the neck or nailed somewhere with the alleged crime written on it. Historical records also indicate that, at the bare minimum, the motivation was reprisal for criminal behavior, whether that particular accusation was accurate or not. It's also highly implausible that most were innocent. This black revisionist narrative is no different from the discussion regarding black crime of our age. Their mommas are always whailing about how he was a good boy and dindu nothin, despite video evidence and a criminal record proving otherwise.
explain yourself then
First, admit that you're a retard because I don't see any need for an explanation. I already made intelligible claims.
My claim was that they don't stand out in like they do in basketball, for instance. There are very potent fighters from a variety of ethnic backgrounds. Compared with basketball, the best are almost exclusively black.
The tulsa massacre litteraly came from a false accusation were the supposed victim never even bring the case to court they killed them bc of their race
they're being judged harsher for the crime they did because of their race, no?
and yes its totally plausible that they were innocent cause taking ramdom black and killing them is just rolling dice and since most of the black people dont commit crime then its probable they were mostly innocent
even for crime they didnt commit btw they are judging the race not the crime, be fr the people in the tulsa massacre would def want every black people dead criminals or no
It's a false acquisition, according to blacks, and considering the fact that they lie about the character of their kin who get caught up with the law it's plausible to be skeptical. That's a singular event that doesn't define the entirety of the phenomenon.
not a single proof of it + the victim didnt bring it to court its objective point you cant say otherwise and i tell you that you cant tell its because they were criminal when you have no proof and no case at all also tell me what part of the phenomenon you want to talk about
A singular event, like a crime committed by a member of one race against another, can indeed lead to senseless violence. My claim is that it's ill-informed to assume that blacks were entirely innocent all the time.
They were not all innocent but most of them were innocent also its a lot more interesting to look up why this minority of people would commit a crime than killing ramdom people. Its obvious that as a law enforcment event its really awful no one with comon sense would do that except that they were doing it not for the law but for the racism
A lynching would generally be done because of a heinous crime like rape or murder, which, in my view, should be punishable by death. My claim here is that this narrative that blacks were entirely innocent all the time isn't factual. I'm not claiming that people weren't racist back then, as they most certainly were.
Trying to resolve murder by killing one more person
So the narrative that whites, in all cases, lynched blacks for no reason other than being racist is inaccurate?
If you killed a member of my family, I'd want to personally kill you myself if possible. Otherwise, you deserve the death penalty.Trying to resolve murder by killing one more person
Some whites most of them racist lynched ramdom black saying that they were criminals while they had no proof and no casse to court
Yes cause you are emotional it prove my point you want to kill someone but in the end your family member is still dead
