Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Addressing 2 common copes in this sphere.

DefeatedTanto

DefeatedTanto

To get up, or not to get up
Joined
Mar 9, 2026
Posts
43
Online time
17m 25s
So recently I have been coming across copes from normies who have discovered this part of the internet on social media. I mean its gone totally mainstream. It's mostly proposed by looksmaxxing guys but let me just address these real quick with brutal honesty.

Cope number 1: It was better back then, we would have gotten a loyal woman to marry and build a life with.

Yes this is true. But so is claiming you lost your virginity to a prostitute. Yes you would have found yourself a pure woman, very high probability of being a virgin, and she would be very loyal to you. But men need to understand, it was because the society and the values at the time shaped this behaviour. If she cheated, the whole society would have shunned her to the abyss, even her own parents and family members. Other females also, (not that they believed in it) but to save themselves they would force themselves to hate the girl etc. Society put a cage around women and made them forcefully behave a certain way. But biologically, these holes are the same regardless of time. That attractive man she sees in the street that mogs her husband, her pussy is tingling and shes imagining fucking him. Maybe she would imagine him fucking her by putting his face mentally on her husband during sex. That famous actor, singer etc. Notice how female boomers reminisce about an old actor/singer during their time and talk about how she used to fantasize about him. Biology rules women, and no job, no status, amount of money, societal era, values etc is bringing true attraction. You cant force true love and attraction. She never loved you, and she was cheating on you in her mind everytime. Today, she can act those thoughts out, thats it. In the modern era, we see this still in strong islamic countries, but even there it can't be fully contained. Because biology rules.

It was over since we evolved from apes.

Cope number 2 (kind of links back to 1): Chad gets full loyalty and the woman only loves him.

Wrong. Even chad can't get sole loyalty and love from a woman. Chad will experience true sexual attraction from a woman, but not loyalty. We need to understand women are not sentient, they have no analytical processing centres in their brains. Its all feeling and impulse. Like animals. One day she could fuck chad with full sexual might and the next day she realises shes broke and flied out to dubai to get shat on by a sub 5 arab in a yacht for a couple thousand, or start an OF. Or she wants to fuck a different race of chad. Maybe she watched a kdrama, and wants to fuck chang. Maybe she saw sheboons and boons partying on social media, now wants to fuck tyrone listening to rap music. Maybe she sees an arab man in a cool movie role and gets the tingles to fuck chaddam. And after all this, she wants to become spiritual and takes a spiritual trip to india to find chadpreet only to get SA'ed by sub 5 curries.

Point im making is even chad can't get full loyalty and an emotional connection from a hole, because holes are biologically incapable. Hence why they are obsessed with emotional connections because they know they never really feel it. Its all an experience to them. Relationships are an experience and a movie scene to them.

A wise man once told me this. 'How they feel is what they care about most'. Not what chad wants/thinks.
 
So recently I have been coming across copes from normies who have discovered this part of the internet on social media. I mean its gone totally mainstream. It's mostly proposed by looksmaxxing guys but let me just address these real quick with brutal honesty.

Cope number 1: It was better back then, we would have gotten a loyal woman to marry and build a life with.

Yes this is true. But so is claiming you lost your virginity to a prostitute. Yes you would have found yourself a pure woman, very high probability of being a virgin, and she would be very loyal to you. But men need to understand, it was because the society and the values at the time shaped this behaviour. If she cheated, the whole society would have shunned her to the abyss, even her own parents and family members. Other females also, (not that they believed in it) but to save themselves they would force themselves to hate the girl etc. Society put a cage around women and made them forcefully behave a certain way. But biologically, these holes are the same regardless of time. That attractive man she sees in the street that mogs her husband, her pussy is tingling and shes imagining fucking him. Maybe she would imagine him fucking her by putting his face mentally on her husband during sex. That famous actor, singer etc. Notice how female boomers reminisce about an old actor/singer during their time and talk about how she used to fantasize about him. Biology rules women, and no job, no status, amount of money, societal era, values etc is bringing true attraction. You cant force true love and attraction. She never loved you, and she was cheating on you in her mind everytime. Today, she can act those thoughts out, thats it. In the modern era, we see this still in strong islamic countries, but even there it can't be fully contained. Because biology rules.

It was over since we evolved from apes.

Cope number 2 (kind of links back to 1): Chad gets full loyalty and the woman only loves him.

Wrong. Even chad can't get sole loyalty and love from a woman. Chad will experience true sexual attraction from a woman, but not loyalty. We need to understand women are not sentient, they have no analytical processing centres in their brains. Its all feeling and impulse. Like animals. One day she could fuck chad with full sexual might and the next day she realises shes broke and flied out to dubai to get shat on by a sub 5 arab in a yacht for a couple thousand, or start an OF. Or she wants to fuck a different race of chad. Maybe she watched a kdrama, and wants to fuck chang. Maybe she saw sheboons and boons partying on social media, now wants to fuck tyrone listening to rap music. Maybe she sees an arab man in a cool movie role and gets the tingles to fuck chaddam. And after all this, she wants to become spiritual and takes a spiritual trip to india to find chadpreet only to get SA'ed by sub 5 curries.

Point im making is even chad can't get full loyalty and an emotional connection from a hole, because holes are biologically incapable. Hence why they are obsessed with emotional connections because they know they never really feel it. Its all an experience to them. Relationships are an experience and a movie scene to them.

A wise man once told me this. 'How they feel is what they care about most'. Not what chad wants/thinks.
BUMP!
1776462535049
 
they are obsessed with emotional connections because they know they never really feel it. Its all an experience to them. Relationships are an experience and a movie scene to them.
That is a good observation. It’s overcompensation. They talk about "soulmates" and "energy" precisely because their attraction is actually based on rigid physical metrics like facial attractiveness, height, and other immutable traits.

Though I will say that while this post is correct in several respects, it is still true that in the past, intersexual dynamics were superior to an extent, even if we account for the inherent nature of women — as it was mitigated by external factors such as culture and the very nature of the social structure, which goes beyond mere coercion but also the fundamental perspective that they had on the world.
 
That is a good observation. It’s overcompensation. They talk about "soulmates" and "energy" precisely because their attraction is actually based on rigid physical metrics like facial attractiveness, height, and other immutable traits.

Though I will say that while this post is correct in several respects, it is still true that in the past, intersexual dynamics were superior to an extent, even if we account for the inherent nature of women — as it was mitigated by external factors such as culture and the very nature of the social structure, which goes beyond mere coercion but also the fundamental perspective that they had on the world.
It was superior because men were sheltered from female nature. The woman still fantasized about chads whether that be athletes, actors, singers or random guys in the street. No amount of social structure is changing that. She can't stop those feelings. Simple as that. This means its not true attraction with her husband.

Send a chad into Taliban Sharia Law Afghanistan right now. All the women are flocking to him but most won't due to the threat of being stoned to death. But in their minds they are itching for that chad.
 
It was superior because men were sheltered from female nature. The woman still fantasized about chads whether that be athletes, actors, singers or random guys in the street. No amount of social structure is changing that. She can't stop those feelings. Simple as that. This means its not true attraction with her husband.

Send a chad into Taliban Sharia Law Afghanistan right now. All the women are flocking to him but most won't due to the threat of being stoned to death. But in their minds they are itching for that chad.
Their nature definitely stays fundamentally the same (as in they will always remain hypergamous, selfish, and be inclined toward the behaviors you mentioned), but a society that values duty and family creates a different psychological state than one that values dopamine, individualistic "self-fulfillment", subjectivism, and irreligion. In the past, women were raised to view men as partners in a survival unit, not as entertainment products on a screen. It would be reasonable to assume that in many cases, if a woman saw Chad it was viewed more as a fleeting distraction, not a life goal; at most, it was akin to a distant fantasy, which is still despicable, but mostly negligible in the physical world. Culture does reshape how nature is experienced and acted upon.

In such a society, the "loyalty" was a performance for the Divine or the community, which inevitably leads to the internalization of the behavior. When you believe your eternal soul or your family’s honor is at stake, you don't just "fantasize" the same way. The modern era has removed the moral weight of choice, which is why everything feels so hollow now; evidently, if culture was mostly meaningless we would not observe intersexual dynamics consistently worsening irrespective of technological progress, primarily resulting from increasingly gynocentric sentiments.
 
Their nature definitely stays fundamentally the same (as in they will always remain hypergamous, selfish, and be inclined toward the behaviors you mentioned), but a society that values duty and family creates a different psychological state than one that values dopamine, individualistic "self-fulfillment", subjectivism, and irreligion. In the past, women were raised to view men as partners in a survival unit, not as entertainment products on a screen. It would be reasonable to assume that in many cases, if a woman saw Chad it was viewed more as a fleeting distraction, not a life goal; at most, it was akin to a distant fantasy, which is still despicable, but mostly negligible in the physical world. Culture does reshape how nature is experienced and acted upon.

In such a society, the "loyalty" was a performance for the Divine or the community, which inevitably leads to the internalization of the behavior. When you believe your eternal soul or your family’s honor is at stake, you don't just "fantasize" the same way. The modern era has removed the moral weight of choice, which is why everything feels so hollow now; evidently, if culture was mostly meaningless we would not observe intersexual dynamics consistently worsening irrespective of technological progress, primarily resulting from increasingly gynocentric sentiments.
I understand where you're coming from but I just can't peacefully live with the fact that my wife would be sexually attracted to another man. Forget the values. Values and culture is all just a cope to keep women in line. I can't accept that.

You are essentially getting cucked in her mind. Biology comes to collect at the end of the day. You are her host for her survival impulses. She finds other men more sexually stimulating than you. You are just a survival tool.

Us men want women to view us like how we view them. Sexually attractive/stimulating creatures that we can love. If she sees another man in this regard more than you, it is emasculating to another degree as you just become a betabuxx cuck for her survival. You work, provide show loyalty only for her to be sexually attracted to another man, and it is this sexual attraction in which we value women.
 
High IQ thread.
 
>Chad cant get loyalty
Oofy doofy cope
 
Low iq take, i hate to say it but there does exist foids who can remain more logical and analytical its not simple as this, we all share fem and masc qualities as well as animilastic/technological qualities, thats what makes us human
 
No one is immune to betrayal, its jus chad has a higher chance of keeping a foid loyal to him
 
How they feel is what they care about most'. Not what chad wants/thinks.
Thats borderline everyone tho lol, everyone leans toward what they want over another person
 
Low iq take, i hate to say it but there does exist foids who can remain more logical and analytical its not simple as this, we all share fem and masc qualities as well as animilastic/technological qualities, thats what makes us human
cope, you just havent realised it. Every foid behaviour links back to this point. They only care about their feelings. They use chad for looks and cucks for bucks. The closest thing to 'love' is what you make of it. Id rather a foid use me for my looks than bucks.
 
cope, you just havent realised it. Every foid behaviour links back to this point. They only care about their feelings. They use chad for looks and cucks for bucks. The closest thing to 'love' is what you make of it. Id rather a foid use me for my looks than bucks.
alpha (chad) fucks, beta (nearcel) bucks
 

Similar threads

CrimsonPine47
Replies
43
Views
1K
SnakeCel
SnakeCel
S
Replies
10
Views
1K
just_a_little_ill
just_a_little_ill
She Does Not Exist
Replies
37
Views
881
SubhumanOldcel
SubhumanOldcel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top