
Marellomarini
Honorable mayor
★★★
- Joined
- May 3, 2025
- Posts
- 218
.
Hah, sure.I think both psychologists and biologists would disagree with most of black pill points.
Yup. Only around 40% of men reproduced throughout history compared to 89% women.Not being able to get sex isn't a phenomenon kek
You would be surprised, I guessHah, sure.
Care to elaborate ?biologists would disagree with most of black pill points.
Psychology is gay pseudo-science anyway
They will agree with basic stuff etc but I think they will deny that it's over for ugly men, that women prefer dogs over ugly guys etc etc etc and other pills. They don't deny natural selection but I think they could say that "people are more complex than other animals" or something like that and I also think they may be as biased as normies. Imagine an ugly biologist who managed to get a partner, for example. He probably also will say stuff like it's not over for uglies etc.Care to elaborate ?
Natural selection isnt our problem.They will agree with basic stuff etc but I think they will deny that it's over for ugly men, that women prefer dogs over ugly guys etc etc etc and other pills. They don't deny natural selection but I think they could say that "people are more complex than other animals" or something like that and I also think they may be as biased as normies. Imagine an ugly biologist who managed to get a partner, for example. He probably also will say stuff like it's not over for uglies etc.
So, of course they don't reject the idea of natural selection and other stuff but they could disagree with an idea that looks are everything. The fact they studied/keep studying biology doesn't mean they are close to incels in the terms of views.
Biologists? They've on occasion actually tried to shit on us and say that the BP is a no brainer and they always knew. Evo-Biologists and Evo-Psych agree with the BP 1 to 1, BP ideas literally stem from their schools of thought and studies. Mainline psychologists that you'd see as therapists are retards who know nothing.I think both psychologists and biologists would disagree with most of black pill points.
Which for the record sexual selection is retarded as there's tons of cases within humans and the animal kingdom where females selection for retarded traits for no reason that make the species have a higher mortality rate. It's impossible to moralize sexual selection like natural selection (not like natural selection and evolution are anything but chaos, but that's a larger discussion.Natural selection isnt our problem.
Sexual selection is
Unfortunately i see more and more foids arguing that hypergamy is good because its just natural selection. (It isnt)Which for the record sexual selection is retarded as there's tons of cases within humans and the animal kingdom where females selection for retarded traits for no reason that make the species have a higher mortality rate. It's impossible to moralize sexual selection like natural selection (not like natural selection and evolution are anything but chaos, but that's a larger discussion.
Well biologists usually study mate selection, don't they? They're supposed to be aware of the fact that humans are animals as well. Most black pilled ideas are pretty self-evident, very observable in our everyday life and aren't really hidden, people just don't like admitting it publicly, but deep down they know.I think both psychologists and biologists would disagree with most of black pill points.
I thought I agree with what you said.You would be surprised, I guess
Ah jesus, it's a video on youtube and it's all in Italian.What did he say specifically?
Yeah but i mean first i need to find the video, it's on YouTube and second it's all in Italian language so I think it would be a disaster for you guys.he's correct but that's not as dismissive as he probably thinks it is since the internet is such a big part of modern life now
could you link to what he said?
I apologize, my mistake. He didn't say it himself, or rather, he said it but didn't really mean it. He said that most people think that way, referring to a famous list of newspapers called Fanpage.It who classifies the topic of incels in the innovation and technology section and then he said what I wrote, as if it were something that was born and died on the internet, but in reality, as some people know, that's not the case at all. So he mean this, my apologize.What did he say specifically?
I apologize, my mistake. He didn't say it himself, or rather, he said it but didn't really mean it. He said that most people think that way, referring to a famous list of newspapers called Fanpage.It who classifies the topic of incels in the innovation and technology section and then he said what I wrote, as if it were something that was born and died on the internet, but in reality, as some people know, that's not the case at all. So he mean this, my apologize.he's correct but that's not as dismissive as he probably thinks it is since the internet is such a big part of modern life now
could you link to what he said?
that's alright tbh, I think it's an opinion a lot of people might have anyways so it's good to comment on it regardlessI apologize, my mistake. He didn't say it himself, or rather, he said it but didn't really mean it. He said that most people think that way, referring to a famous list of newspapers called Fanpage.It who classifies the topic of incels in the innovation and technology section and then he said what I wrote, as if it were something that was born and died on the internet, but in reality, as some people know, that's not the case at all. So he mean this, my apologize.
If he spoke the truth he’d be fired from his job and kicked out from academia forever
You got me.Italian psychologist = @PersonalityChad