Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

A well-known Italian psychologist said that the incel phenomenon is born and dies on the internet. I'm not so sure with this. What do you think??

Not being able to get sex isn't a phenomenon kek
 
I think both psychologists and biologists would disagree with most of black pill points.
 
What did he say specifically?
 
How will it die, when hypergamy and foid standards are only increasing, and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future?

It will be the opposite, inceldom will increase as more guys are swept aside.
 
He's coping hard
 
he's correct but that's not as dismissive as he probably thinks it is since the internet is such a big part of modern life now
could you link to what he said?
 
Natrual selection and evolution principals prove the BP.
 
Makes me wanna watch a post apocalyptic movie with roving bands of cannibals and rapists.

WW3 will eventually happen so it's just a matter of when not if. Trust being the main issue with humans on all levels.

No food, just eat people. No pussy just rape or offer protection for access to pussy.

Next time you eat, shit, or sleep think about the apocalypse. The fact that you have to eat, shit, and sleep should humble you. We're flawed. WW3 and apocalyptic cannibal scenarios are not so far fetched.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsXOQh36AT0
 
nigga thinks i will take tony sopranos theory seriously
 
Care to elaborate ?
They will agree with basic stuff etc but I think they will deny that it's over for ugly men, that women prefer dogs over ugly guys etc etc etc and other pills. They don't deny natural selection but I think they could say that "people are more complex than other animals" or something like that and I also think they may be as biased as normies. Imagine an ugly biologist who managed to get a partner, for example. He probably also will say stuff like it's not over for uglies etc.

So, of course they don't reject the idea of natural selection and other stuff but they could disagree with an idea that looks are everything. The fact they studied/keep studying biology doesn't mean they are close to incels in the terms of views.

We can't access famous biologists but we could find some average people who are into biology (online, I mean) and talk to them and see what they think (if someone had time for that).
 
They will agree with basic stuff etc but I think they will deny that it's over for ugly men, that women prefer dogs over ugly guys etc etc etc and other pills. They don't deny natural selection but I think they could say that "people are more complex than other animals" or something like that and I also think they may be as biased as normies. Imagine an ugly biologist who managed to get a partner, for example. He probably also will say stuff like it's not over for uglies etc.

So, of course they don't reject the idea of natural selection and other stuff but they could disagree with an idea that looks are everything. The fact they studied/keep studying biology doesn't mean they are close to incels in the terms of views.
Natural selection isnt our problem.
Sexual selection is
 
I think both psychologists and biologists would disagree with most of black pill points.
Biologists? They've on occasion actually tried to shit on us and say that the BP is a no brainer and they always knew. Evo-Biologists and Evo-Psych agree with the BP 1 to 1, BP ideas literally stem from their schools of thought and studies. Mainline psychologists that you'd see as therapists are retards who know nothing.
 
Natural selection isnt our problem.
Sexual selection is
Which for the record sexual selection is retarded as there's tons of cases within humans and the animal kingdom where females selection for retarded traits for no reason that make the species have a higher mortality rate. It's impossible to moralize sexual selection like natural selection (not like natural selection and evolution are anything but chaos, but that's a larger discussion.
 
Which for the record sexual selection is retarded as there's tons of cases within humans and the animal kingdom where females selection for retarded traits for no reason that make the species have a higher mortality rate. It's impossible to moralize sexual selection like natural selection (not like natural selection and evolution are anything but chaos, but that's a larger discussion.
Unfortunately i see more and more foids arguing that hypergamy is good because its just natural selection. (It isnt)
 
More or less, but I'd say it's more so that it couldn't have really be born without the internet. I've been thinking about it here and there since posting this:


No matter how much discrimination they face in society, without the internet, ugly men would probably never have come together, never recognized the commonalities in their experiences, and never realized what our real problem is. With racism, you are already born into and surrounded by people facing the same problems and societal attitutes as you are, so if anything, they will explain it to you instead of you figuring it out. With sexism, that's not necessarily the case, you can be the only person of your gender in your family for example, but there will inevitably be so many people of your group around you anyway that you will still be able to share your experiences and bond over them.

Neither of those things is true with lookism. Attractiveness is somewhat heritable, but it's absolutely nowhere near so to the level of people having children of their looks level even like 60 or 70% of the time. You absolutely can be the only ugly person in your family, and outside of their homes, ugly men are usually either shut out of socialization entirely or are the only ugly guys in small friend groups they are desperately holding together, in addition to ugly people not looking to spend time with other ugly people either. Add to that the relentless societal bluepill propaganda that looks are irrelevant for men, and only for men, and it's not at all impossible to imagine that, even if proof of how much looks matter and what problems ugly men face were growing in the academic literature, without a way for large amounts of people to effortlessly share information, that ugly men would just keep on being isolated, atomized, not knowing why they are suffering and blaming themselves for it.
 
I think both psychologists and biologists would disagree with most of black pill points.
Well biologists usually study mate selection, don't they? They're supposed to be aware of the fact that humans are animals as well. Most black pilled ideas are pretty self-evident, very observable in our everyday life and aren't really hidden, people just don't like admitting it publicly, but deep down they know.
 
That psychologist is actually saying " If internet do not exist anymore, incel will shut the fuck up "

If we do not have internet anymore to express ourself, we just get back to the time where incels where extremly isolated, incel will still exist without internet, but nobody will know, like it used to be before.
 
he's correct but that's not as dismissive as he probably thinks it is since the internet is such a big part of modern life now
could you link to what he said?
Yeah but i mean first i need to find the video, it's on YouTube and second it's all in Italian language so I think it would be a disaster for you guys.
 
Italian psychologist = @PersonalityChad
 
What did he say specifically?
I apologize, my mistake. He didn't say it himself, or rather, he said it but didn't really mean it. He said that most people think that way, referring to a famous list of newspapers called Fanpage.It who classifies the topic of incels in the innovation and technology section and then he said what I wrote, as if it were something that was born and died on the internet, but in reality, as some people know, that's not the case at all. So he mean this, my apologize.
 
only going to get worse until real AI sex robots r commerically available.
 
he's correct but that's not as dismissive as he probably thinks it is since the internet is such a big part of modern life now
could you link to what he said?
I apologize, my mistake. He didn't say it himself, or rather, he said it but didn't really mean it. He said that most people think that way, referring to a famous list of newspapers called Fanpage.It who classifies the topic of incels in the innovation and technology section and then he said what I wrote, as if it were something that was born and died on the internet, but in reality, as some people know, that's not the case at all. So he mean this, my apologize.
 
I apologize, my mistake. He didn't say it himself, or rather, he said it but didn't really mean it. He said that most people think that way, referring to a famous list of newspapers called Fanpage.It who classifies the topic of incels in the innovation and technology section and then he said what I wrote, as if it were something that was born and died on the internet, but in reality, as some people know, that's not the case at all. So he mean this, my apologize.
that's alright tbh, I think it's an opinion a lot of people might have anyways so it's good to comment on it regardless
 
tell that to george sodini
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top