A theory to understand "femcels"

[Dropbox]

I have a theory I wish to present, it's the only way to make sense of what these people claim.

They exist in a completely different mental universe, bear with me now...

Incels are unpeople to women, they do not exist. Guys below a certain physical appearance threshold are either willfully or subconsciously filtered out of existence by women. Therefore all women's arguments about dating start somewhere around a high tier normie or chadlite. Their entire conception of the male sex starts at chadlite.

They also tend to vastly inflate the physical attractiveness of the average woman.

Their view of sexual dynamics beings that a 6/10 dude matches with a 1/10 woman. When they talk about going for "ugly losers" they're talking about chadlite.

 

[Deleted member 15752]

femcels = foids that cannot get chad

 

[Dropbox]

I will push one theory that gives them a bit of a bone.

Male and female desires are different.

Speaking in general terms,

Females are the gatekeepers to sexual intercourse
Males are the gatekeepers to relationships

Then end goal of the male is sex, the end goal of the female is a relationship, with chad, very generally.

I believe it was Roosh who said women can't be incel, but they can be insol(involuntary solitude). They can get sexual intercourse as long as they lower their standards, but no male chad wants to be seen in public with them.

 

[Teutonic Knight]

Femcels could get sex, but their existence is still a good case for an argument about how important looks are for this modern (Western) society.

A "femcel" (let's assume it's a woman bellow 5/10 in looks) would not get the same opportunities a Stacy would. There is a hierarchy based on looks among women too, that's why they obsess so much about make up and other things.

I agree that comparing their troubles with male incels is ridiculous, but the fact is that they're still much lower than Stacies on the female looks hierarchy and get treated differently.

The existence of women declaring themselves as femcels could benefit incels IMO. It's a good thing that a parallel phenomenon exists so that we can draw comparisons. Like for example pointing out the hypocrisy of the society attacking only male incels and things like that. Femcels can also be a good argument against the modern dating, because you can point out that there are women who are unhappy with it as well (for whatever reasons).

 

[Deleted member 16455]

femcels = foids that cannot get chad

 

[ihaveno1]

They exist in a completely different mental universe

tbh.. see my sig, great ER quote

 

[Dropbox]

Femcels could get sex, but their existence is still a good case for an argument about how important looks are for this modern (Western) society.

A "femcel" (let's assume it's a woman bellow 5/10 in looks) would not get the same opportunities a Stacy would. There is a hierarchy based on looks among women too, that's why they obsess so much about make up and other things.

I agree that comparing their troubles with male incels is ridiculous, but the fact is that they're still much lower than Stacies on the female looks hierarchy and get treated differently.

The existence of women declaring themselves as femcels could benefit incels IMO. It's a good thing that a parallel phenomenon exists so that we can draw comparisons. Like for example pointing out the hypocrisy of the society attacking only male incels and things like that. Femcels can also be a good argument against the modern dating, because you can point out that there are women who are unhappy with it as well (for whatever reasons).

I'd say it's a very small percentage of the most unfortunately women upset they can't get an above average guy to settle down with them.

 

[Teutonic Knight]

I'd say it's a very small percentage of the most unfortunately women upset they can't get an above average guy to settle down with them.

Whatever it is, they're unhappy about something related to the modern dating. More people unhappy with the society = better for us.

 

[Honeypot]

I will push one theory that gives them a bit of a bone.

Male and female desires are different.

Speaking in general terms,

Females are the gatekeepers to sexual intercourse
Males are the gatekeepers to relationships

Then end goal of the male is sex, the end goal of the female is a relationship, with chad, very generally.

I believe it was Roosh who said women can't be incel, but they can be insol(involuntary solitude). They can get sexual intercourse as long as they lower their standards, but no male chad wants to be seen in public with them.

Don't fall in to redpill bullshit, I've seen jailbaits really lust over Chads, more than me over Stacies.

Here in my country is usual to lock up your young daughters to avoid them becoming pregnant as the average person here is very poor. And usually young woman escape the lock up and go and fuck Chad, several young single mother in my family that did exactly this.

A prime woman in their ovulation days can lust for a Chad more than any male will ever do for whatever foid in his entire life.

 

[GameDevCel]

100% true

we should share this graph everywhere

 

[Angry_runt]

 

[Honeypot]

Redpill cucks believe in to this meme of the sex keeper and relationship keepers because most of them are either normie looking or at best high tier normie/chadlite.

You have to negotiate sex with foids like that if you aren't Chad, that's the reality all redpill cucks have seen and their truth.

This is not sub8 theory, you can achieve sex while being sub8 but it will be like this in some negotiations where the more subhuman you are the more dignity you will lose till you achieve to sub4 where becomes impossible to bargain, not even betabuxing or statusmaxxing will work in sub4.

 

[CuriousG]

I think you’re theory is correct, when I’m around ugly or older women that I have no sexual desire for, I naively assume they are sexless, have no sexual thoughts themselves

It’s easy to appreciate fiods could think that about me

The scary thought is do I repulse them

 

[Mik_TFL]

Honestly, this is just a semantics issue. "Femcels", as an equivalent of us just don't exist, any woman can get sex.

The thing is, that by the literal definition of incel, we would all be volcels, since sex can be bought legally for an amount of money that anyone here could conceivably acquire. That doesn't matter, because we've accepted that escortcels have not really ascended and true ascension entails having sex with someone who desires to have sex with you without paying. By that definition femcels also don't exist, since most of us would be happy to have sex with them.

However, their claim is that for them ascension is "having sex while being in a long term loving relationship with that person". By that definition, I suspect there might be some truly deformed women out there who could fit the bill but we are talking about a couple thousand in the whole world, e.g : http://www.en.netralnews.com/news/h...umors.grow.on.this.woman.after.she.gave.birth

This is where OP's theory comes in and is correct, the ugly females that fail to get a chad-lite don't even consider us human so they fail to see themselves as the volcels they are, even by their own definition of "femceldom". Some claim they tried lowering their standards, but in reality they may have lowered them by 5% or 10%, not the 40% or 50% that would be required to get down to their looksmatch level.

Even assuming that 60% or even 70% of incels only want sex and would not provide a "long term loving relationship", it would take them dating 2 incels to have better than 50% chances... But tutorial mode seems too fucking hard for them.

 

[Haywire]

lol femcels.... this was before tinder i remember seeing ugly foids with men above them looks wise. ugly woman can easily get men who are high tier normies or even chadlite if the woman is say not a whale or deformed its easy for them. the ones that you see are single have some insane list the men must have for them to date them.

 

[Michael15651]

"Femcels" are an absolute joke.

 

[Dionysus]

femcels = foids that cannot get chad

 

[Vigil]

I have a theory I wish to present, it's the only way to make sense of what these people claim.

They exist in a completely different mental universe, bear with me now...

Incels are unpeople to women, they do not exist. Guys below a certain physical appearance threshold are either willfully or subconsciously filtered out of existence by women. Therefore all women's arguments about dating start somewhere around a high tier normie or chadlite. Their entire conception of the male sex starts at chadlite.

They also tend to vastly inflate the physical attractiveness of the average woman.

Their view of sexual dynamics beings that a 6/10 dude matches with a 1/10 woman. When they talk about going for "ugly losers" they're talking about chadlite.

View attachment 103149

but now with the way women eat all the beckies are now 1-4s because they are a good 40-100 pounds heavier than they should be.