or re-read 50 Shades of Grey!
Most women do not even identify as feminists, they will rather say something along the lines of "I'm not a feminist, BUT..."
And after this "but", you get all the typically feminist BS. T
The RadFems, however, are very interesting. In the past, I spent a good deal of time reading RadFem blogs and following figures such as Cathy Brennan or Sheila Jeffreys. These RadFems (to be found on r/gendercritical, for instance) are almost ... let's say, they are so feminist that they are almost misogynistic again. Their reasoning is that 50 Shades of Hypergamous BDSM and Rape Fantasies are the product of patriarchy, of rape culture and gender roles, etc. So they have this desire to "liberate" women from it, to save women from it.
However, the more senior RadFems, those, whose blogs are a few years old, often have a bitterness about women that feels strangely equal to the bitterness you can find in our circles. Because the older lesbians had to realize sooner or later that the average woman does not want to be "saved" from a fate as Chad's sex slave or something - quite the opposite. You find a lot of bitterness, a lot of broken enthusiasm in these circles. Many of these RadFem lesbians (and they are 99% lesbian) had relationships with bisexual or pansexual women - and were eventually left for a man, of course. They write angry rants about how women all have these socially hypergamous and sexually submissive fantasies.
And in that regard they do remind me of us incels. Many incels are also "ex-idealists". I certainly am. People who used to believe that women have different preferences, that the idea of women being all these little sex slaves is brah cultur and evo-psy misogyny etc before they eventually woke up and became bitter.
Also, RadFems are hilarious in their ways to defend themselves against trannies. Becuase now you have all these trannies who say that there are "women with penises" and that hence there can be lesbians with penises and that real lesbians are therefore "transphobic" if they want to exclude men. With logic on their side, they obviously have more and more "normal" women against them. Women, who love the idea of having the social capital that comes with being considered "queer" etc while still getting fucked by big cocks etc
Honestly, if the RadFems weren't so anti-male and not so ridiculous in their conspiratorial way to make men the scapegoats for every ill in the world, I would almost like them: they could be a tiny, quirky subculture and radical lesbians and do their own thing. Instead, they want to "save" women from Chad and ... yeah, all goes downhill from there. Almost like "nice guys"...
