F
I know IT will probably not read this, and if they do they will not respond, and many of you will not either, but I am lying in bed with nothing to do and saw a post I was actually interested in replying to, so why not. You are welcome to add your own thoughts if you have something to say.
That is not fact. If patriarchy really worked the way it is described, incels would be enjoying the benefits of it. Instead they have none of the money, women, or influence that the system supposedly hands to men.
No one needs to be taught this by a system. A man quickly learns his worth by how women respond to him and how other men compare him. If women were not drawn to wealth, status, or sexual experience, these things would not matter. They matter because women and men both judge by them.
Nobody is forcing women to ignore men who do not fit those roles. Women choose who to sleep with, date, and marry, and they usually choose men who are masculine, wealthy, or high-status. If women really wanted meek, awkward men, there would be no incels to speak of!
LOL? Incels do not oppress anyone. They have no ability to, because they lack influence over women in the first place.
If incels really followed the system perfectly, then what kind of patriarchy is it that leaves them with nothing? How can a system meant to give men power also produce men who are powerless and unwanted? These are men who do not get women, money, or respect, and that is why they are angry.
Looks are not superficial when they decide who gets attention and who does not. There are dozens of studies on how physical appearance affects dating, career success, and social treatment, and many of them are summarized in the "must-read content" section of this forum. Incels may overlook their own faults, but they are not wrong to point out that appearance and status are decisive in modern dating.
Incels are not being affirmed. They are ridiculed and told to improve or die alone. What keeps them in that cycle is not encouragement from others but the lack of any way out.
Angry words are exactly what you should expect from men who are angry, and incels are fully justified in that anger. They have been rejected, ignored, and mocked for years, so of course their language reflects bitterness. Reducing the entire group to its worst words avoids the fact that behind the posts are people who feel shut out of ordinary human connection, which, may I remind you, sits at the very middle of Maslow's hierarchy of needs.
There is no pipeline. There are just men who fail in the same ways and gather in the same places. The "bear" line, if anything, only confirms what incels say, since women repeat it proudly without thinking that a bear would maul them while the awkward, short, rejected man would not. It shows how far some women would go to signal disdain for men they find undesirable.
That is not fact. If patriarchy really worked the way it is described, incels would be enjoying the benefits of it. Instead they have none of the money, women, or influence that the system supposedly hands to men.
No one needs to be taught this by a system. A man quickly learns his worth by how women respond to him and how other men compare him. If women were not drawn to wealth, status, or sexual experience, these things would not matter. They matter because women and men both judge by them.
Nobody is forcing women to ignore men who do not fit those roles. Women choose who to sleep with, date, and marry, and they usually choose men who are masculine, wealthy, or high-status. If women really wanted meek, awkward men, there would be no incels to speak of!
LOL? Incels do not oppress anyone. They have no ability to, because they lack influence over women in the first place.
If incels really followed the system perfectly, then what kind of patriarchy is it that leaves them with nothing? How can a system meant to give men power also produce men who are powerless and unwanted? These are men who do not get women, money, or respect, and that is why they are angry.
Looks are not superficial when they decide who gets attention and who does not. There are dozens of studies on how physical appearance affects dating, career success, and social treatment, and many of them are summarized in the "must-read content" section of this forum. Incels may overlook their own faults, but they are not wrong to point out that appearance and status are decisive in modern dating.
Incels are not being affirmed. They are ridiculed and told to improve or die alone. What keeps them in that cycle is not encouragement from others but the lack of any way out.
Angry words are exactly what you should expect from men who are angry, and incels are fully justified in that anger. They have been rejected, ignored, and mocked for years, so of course their language reflects bitterness. Reducing the entire group to its worst words avoids the fact that behind the posts are people who feel shut out of ordinary human connection, which, may I remind you, sits at the very middle of Maslow's hierarchy of needs.
There is no pipeline. There are just men who fail in the same ways and gather in the same places. The "bear" line, if anything, only confirms what incels say, since women repeat it proudly without thinking that a bear would maul them while the awkward, short, rejected man would not. It shows how far some women would go to signal disdain for men they find undesirable.
